Live data from Hacker News

Marker: Convert PDF to Markdown quickly with high accuracy

github.com

21–30 of 101 posts

Re: Marker: Convert PDF to Markdown quickly with high accuracy

#22
post #13

It'd be really great if there was something like this that also supported image extraction

My current workflow (for getting a magazine onto a website) is Calibre's HTMLZ export, then through Pandoc to markdown. It produces good enough Markdown to feed in to Hugo, and extracts images.

I've been through a number of options in the past and this is what I've settled on.

Re: Marker: Convert PDF to Markdown quickly with high accuracy

#23
Great stuff!

I have a question regarding the output of Nougat: Where do the "hallucinations" come from (just scroll through the Nougat output of the Think Python example to see what I mean)?

Nevermind, i just read it runs it through an LLM, so hallucinations are par for the course.

Re: Marker: Convert PDF to Markdown quickly with high accuracy

#24
Nice work. I tend to do most of my longer reading on an e-reader. PDFs, especially multi-column layouts, are a nightmare with the out-of-the-box offerings from Amazon Kindle or Pocketbook. This looks like something that'll improve my experience quite a lot.

Re: Marker: Convert PDF to Markdown quickly with high accuracy

#27
post #5

Are there any other libraries or online services that does this well? I have a large number of PDFs from government agencies. I’ve tried AWS Textract and works fairly well.

https://www.handwritingocr.com is aimed specifically at handwriting, and will do that better than Textract and co, but works well for printed text too.

Re: Marker: Convert PDF to Markdown quickly with high accuracy

#29
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You should mention that you are the CEO of Mathpix.

It actually doesn't matter. For my cases, I found Mathpix to be much more reliable than Nougat, for example. So, when you have hundreds of documents to convert a year and little time for manual labor on the results, paying a yearly "pro" subscription fee is worth it. However, it will really hit your pocket when you need to prepare datasets from thousands of PDFs... That's what you can't afford without a budget alloca…

While I can see that Mathpix might be the superior choice. What matters to me is that knowing the affiliation of the GP the comment has a very different feel to it.
Post reply on HN