Broadcom to Cut Almost 1,300 VMware Jobs in California After Takeover
31–40 of 133 posts
Re: Broadcom to Cut Almost 1,300 VMware Jobs in California After Takeover
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
> 90% margins source/citation required?
A recent income statement is here (on page 6): https://www.vmware.com/content/dam/digitalmarketing/vmware/e... tl;dr Margin (operating income / total revenue) is about 15%.
Re: Broadcom to Cut Almost 1,300 VMware Jobs in California After Takeover
#33Give me a quick rundown.
Re: Broadcom to Cut Almost 1,300 VMware Jobs in California After Takeover
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
Same as: acquire renown company making a solid product, substitute product by something from China at a fraction of quality/cost, still charge the same for the next couple years until word has spread.
Examples?
Re: Broadcom to Cut Almost 1,300 VMware Jobs in California After Takeover
#35Hey proxmox, maybe get off your a$$ and put out a good multidatacenter management product so that I can transfer vms/manager resources between my clusters? It's one of the few features that keeps part of my operation on vmware instead of on your product.
Re: Broadcom to Cut Almost 1,300 VMware Jobs in California After Takeover
#36Any news on the locations of the cuts? It looks like VMware is mostly in the Bay Area.
Re: Broadcom to Cut Almost 1,300 VMware Jobs in California After Takeover
#37Instead of leveraged buyouts, we now have layoff buyouts. Acquire firm, minimise headcount, keep lagged revenue on existing assets and IP for 5 years while reaping profits on 90% margins.
Isn't that what private equity firms been doing forever?
Re: Broadcom to Cut Almost 1,300 VMware Jobs in California After Takeover
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
Same as: acquire renown company making a solid product, substitute product by something from China at a fraction of quality/cost, still charge the same for the next couple years until word has spread.
Examples?
Re: Broadcom to Cut Almost 1,300 VMware Jobs in California After Takeover
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
A recent income statement is here (on page 6): https://www.vmware.com/content/dam/digitalmarketing/vmware/e... tl;dr Margin (operating income / total revenue) is about 15%.
So the parent of this comment claiming "keep lagged revenue on existing assets and IP for 5 years while reaping profits on 90% margins" is wrong by a huge amount, right?