Earlier quoted context omitted.
My first instinct was to pronounce jaq as "jack".
Did you watch the video? That's exactly how "Jaques" is pronounced. It's French: you ignore everything but the non-s-consonants and the first vowel.
Jaq – A jq clone focused on correctness, speed, and simplicity
51–60 of 254 posts
Re: Jaq – A jq clone focused on correctness, speed, and simplicity
#52[dead]
Re: Jaq – A jq clone focused on correctness, speed, and simplicity
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
My first instinct was to pronounce jaq as "jack".
Did you watch the video? That's exactly how "Jaques" is pronounced. It's French: you ignore everything but the non-s-consonants and the first vowel.
Re: Jaq – A jq clone focused on correctness, speed, and simplicity
#54I applaud this project's focus on correctness and efficiency, but I'd also really like a version of `jq` that's easy to understand without having to learn a whole new syntax. `jq` is a really powerful tool and `jaq` promises to be even more powerful. But, as a system administrator, most lot of the time that I'm dealing with json files, something that behaved more like grep would be sufficient.
Since JSON is JavaScript Object Notation, then an obvious non-special-snowflake language for such expressions on the CLI is JavaScript: https://fx.wtf/getting-started#json-processing
Re: Jaq – A jq clone focused on correctness, speed, and simplicity
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
Did you watch the video? That's exactly how "Jaques" is pronounced. It's French: you ignore everything but the non-s-consonants and the first vowel.
No, /dʒæk/ is not /ʒak/
Yes they're slightly different in theory, but not in any way that would prohibit mutual understanding. Besides, if you're telling anyone about this library you're most certainly going to spell it out anyways.
Re: Jaq – A jq clone focused on correctness, speed, and simplicity
#56I applaud this project's focus on correctness and efficiency, but I'd also really like a version of `jq` that's easy to understand without having to learn a whole new syntax. `jq` is a really powerful tool and `jaq` promises to be even more powerful. But, as a system administrator, most lot of the time that I'm dealing with json files, something that behaved more like grep would be sufficient.
Have you tried `gron`? It converts your nested json into a line by line format which plays better with tools like `grep` From the project's README: ▶ gron " https://api.github.com/repos/tomnomnom/gron/commits?per_page... " | fgrep "commit.author" json[0].commit.author = {}; json[0].commit.author.date = "2016-07-02T10:51:21Z"; json[0].commit.author.email = "mail@tomnomnom.com"; json[0].commit.author.name = "Tom Hudson…
Re: Jaq – A jq clone focused on correctness, speed, and simplicity
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
Did you watch the video? That's exactly how "Jaques" is pronounced. It's French: you ignore everything but the non-s-consonants and the first vowel.
Jack and Jacques have a different "J": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Fr-Paris--Jacques.ogg
Re: Jaq – A jq clone focused on correctness, speed, and simplicity
#58I started using yq over jq. Any significant differences?
Re: Jaq – A jq clone focused on correctness, speed, and simplicity
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
Jack and Jacques have a different "J": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Fr-Paris--Jacques.ogg
Barely. Not enough to be a hinderance to mutual understanding.
Re: Jaq – A jq clone focused on correctness, speed, and simplicity
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
Jack, Jaak, Jackyoo. Jay-Aye-Cue... Also not the point; Jaques is more difficult to guess the correct pronunciation of than Jaq. That's the point.
Jaques is the French spelling of Jack/Jaak/Jak/Jaq. They're all pronounced the same, modulo irrelevant differences in vowel sounds.
- No.
QED.