Live data from Hacker News

Backlash over fake female speakers shuts down developer conference

arstechnica.com

41–50 of 126 posts

Re: Backlash over fake female speakers shuts down developer conference

#41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm having trouble parsing this comment. Who got what they wanted?

[flagged]

You don't know if the conference would have happened otherwise.

And woke is not bad. Some form of woke are bad but I don't think having female speakers is a bad thing.

It is a sausage party and it's not a good thing

Re: Backlash over fake female speakers shuts down developer conference

#42

I understand why people want to talk at conference that have a diverse array of speakers. However, the fact there is an extreme shortage of a specific gender shouldn't really fall on conference organisers. One conference that was blasted for only having one or two women speakers was organised by a women who pointed out that every women who applied got to speak. It's got to the point from what I've noticed from confer…

Good. We don't need every conference to be of top quality speaker or content wise, the same way companies don't always need to hire all the top tech talent - especially if it comes at cost of inclusiveness and diversity.

Re: Backlash over fake female speakers shuts down developer conference

#43

>> IP logs from a forum for programmers obtained by 404 Media I am more interested in what forums is turning over their IP logs to the media, what the privacy policy was for that forum, and if other members of that forum know this is happening

I believe the 404 article said it was lobste.rs.

Re: Backlash over fake female speakers shuts down developer conference

#44
post #23

>> IP logs from a forum for programmers obtained by 404 Media I am more interested in what forums is turning over their IP logs to the media, what the privacy policy was for that forum, and if other members of that forum know this is happening

If you create sockpuppets on a forum for the purpose of fraudulently establishing a fake identity to sell conference tickets, I don’t think you have an expectation of privacy with respect to server logs that establish that. Same as if you rob a bodega, you don’t expect privacy rights over the CCTV footage.

> Same as if you rob a bodega, you don’t expect privacy rights over the CCTV footage.

This comparison is inaccurate. The bodega wasn’t robbed. This is a media reporter asking a bodega for CCTV footage because they are investigating one of the customers.

Re: Backlash over fake female speakers shuts down developer conference

#45

I feel like I'm going insane with some of the takes here. The creator of the conference created catfishing accounts devoted to advertising the event, they advertised and sold their conference as being 'diverse' knowing full well that they're lying and the responses is 'oh, the poor organizer had to commit fraud to survive'? What? If they're lying about whos going to the conference and speaking, then what else are the…

It was also an unusual conference in that they didn't do CFPs; _all_ the speakers were recruited. Very odd setup.

Re: Backlash over fake female speakers shuts down developer conference

#46
post #5

So they got what they wanted. A store is inclusive because everyone can enter it. A conference is inclusive only if you drag every type of person in by force, faking it if it didn’t work out. “Otherwise it’s not inclusive and I’m not participating”. Isn’t that pure nonsense.

> A store is inclusive because everyone can enter it.

Just the ability to enter isn't what makes up inclusivity, especially for a conference. It's about being as included, welcome and accommodated for as another group.

I remember an anecdote from a recent Kate Gregory (iirc) talk about the early days of C++ conferences, where it turned out the organizers just didn't think about renting woman's toilets, only men's toilets. (Not to mention that this distinction is bullshit anyway, but that's a separate topic)

Re: Backlash over fake female speakers shuts down developer conference

#48

>> IP logs from a forum for programmers obtained by 404 Media I am more interested in what forums is turning over their IP logs to the media, what the privacy policy was for that forum, and if other members of that forum know this is happening

Hi, I'm the forum admin who banned Sizovs for suckpuppeting a few years ago: https://lobste.rs/s/s67tjc/don_t_learn_too_many_things#c_nfn...

I know this is pure whataboutism (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism), but I don't have any duty to keep the secrets of sockpuppeting spammers; the forum privacy policy is short and unambiguous. No members have expressed concerns over me banning his accounts in 2019, in 2020 when he spammed us again, or me talking to 404 Media. As a responsible journalist, Sam Cole asked if I had evidence of his abuse and I pasted from my log, though I redacted the exact IP address.

Re: Backlash over fake female speakers shuts down developer conference

#49
post #24

Faking speakers is pretty shitty but at the same time, it is disheartening to acknowledge that in 2023, there are still people who care about the gender or race of speakers.

I ran a workshop a few years back, and some female speakers wrote to me (collectively) to ask that I include more women, along with suggested names. Given that in academia there is already probably pro-female bias in hiring, I think this was bad, and in retrospect I should not have accepted it.

I have to read a lot between the lines here so correct me if I misunderstand what happened. You ran a workshop, in the academic field, which tends to hire more women than men these days (your words). Your workshop still managed to be male dominated, despite being in a female-dominated field, and women complained about that?
Post reply on HN