Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What was the outcome of Reddit blackout?

news.ycombinator.com

441–450 of 478 posts

Re: Ask HN: What was the outcome of Reddit blackout?

#441

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, several of the more technical subs that I used to frequent either just never reopened or splintered off to Lemmy. Some (like /r/Android) actually have entire instances. I personally wrote a userscript to wipe every post comment I've ever made, and have limited my usage to a few particular subs that I still lurk (/r/LocalLLaMA in particular) just bc Lemmy still doesn't seem to have a comparable level of activity…

I think that of the people that have left Reddit. There are two basic groups. Those that replaced it with Lemmy, and those that took it as a moment to kick a habit. I think the latter is the larger group.

Replaced it with Lemmy, sure. I think you're underestimating how many others went off to other large, centralized places, even if they barely relate to reddit. Discord, Tiktok, Instagram, Twitter, etc. If they first and foremost just wanna chat, they don't need a long form forum like reddit, and I imagine most aren't making sizeable comments anyway. I'd be surprised if the mean comment length on a large sub wasn't below Twitter's character limit.

Re: Ask HN: What was the outcome of Reddit blackout?

#442

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Lemmy's main problem is that the software is a buggy, insecure mess. I speak from helping with a small Lemmy* where a couple of subs decamped. (Both are going very well, and one has actually taken off like a rocket.) The answer is, obviously, "patches welcome." But this stuff is a bit janky. The other big problem is that the Fediverse is a collection of software that doesn't quite talk to each other - ActivityPub is…

> The answer is, obviously, "patches welcome." But this stuff is a bit janky. Yeah. I'm optimistic on this front. Bugs are one of those things that "everyone agrees upon", although you're right in that the Lemmy development environment hasn't taken off or expanded as much as it probably should have. Still, bugs will be fixed because its low-hanging fruit. Everyone gets bothered, someone will get bothered enough and t…

>I think the "Adults in the room" know about the problem. But there's also the need for the underlying community to believe in the problem and have an ideological shift to successfully keep the community in unison.

much easier said than done. That's the one big issue on surges of traffic driven through controversy, you get "Witches":

"The moral of the story is: if you’re against witch-hunts, and you promise to found your own little utopian community where witch-hunts will never happen, your new society will end up consisting of approximately three principled civil libertarians and seven zillion witches. It will be a terrible place to live even if witch-hunts are genuinely wrong." - Scott Alexander [0]

Most people by nature are apathetic, so the ones who do get riled up and change more often than not tend to be the highly opinionated ones. This could make for excellent power users who will provide tons of content, or venom that turns the entire community sour.

It sounds like Lemmy has handled this much better than Voat, but identifying the "witches" without disupting the "libertarians" is quite the subtle but ambitious endeavor. I think the key is simply transparency: be ready to show that an active but disruptive user has been nothing but combatative to the community, and explain why certain servers can't be federated as of now. Some will twist the words, but overall a good policy should feel like common sense (even if it takes a lot of designing to properly establish).

[0] https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/05/01/neutral-vs-conservativ...

Re: Ask HN: What was the outcome of Reddit blackout?

#443

Some Reddit communities fled to other platforms such as Lemmy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lemmy_(social_network) Many subreddit moderators protested in various ways and were removed and replaced. Reddit never agreed or compromised and for the most part the movement seems to have run out of steam. Maybe if Reddit squeezes more, more users will go to Lemmy and similar alternative platforms?

>Maybe if Reddit squeezes more, more users will go to Lemmy and similar alternative platforms?

oh, no worries. We have at least two looming controversies for that upcoming.

1. the contributor program (AKA, get paid to post on reddit) that replaces Reddit Gold that was datamined: https://techcrunch.com/2023/09/25/reddit-will-start-paying-y...

2. the looming hostility towards NSFW content that will likely in the mid term (1-2 years) lead to reddit trying to cut off NSFW material.

It's a matter of being prepared for the next drama instead of if it'll ever happen again.

Re: Ask HN: What was the outcome of Reddit blackout?

#445

As a casual but persistent user, it pains me to say it - because ethically I support the grassroots side of the equation - but as a path of least resistance to casual, anonymous public engagement on a wide range of topics, there seems no viable alternative. [For a given subjective value of 'viable', naturally!]. So after a period of abstention, I gradually ended up back there, simply because I know of no other sizeab…

on the other end, I've replaced almost every community I used to browse on Reddit for. The non-casual thing is that it doesn't take one alternative, but many:

- tech topics I browse on HN for. 90+% of what I'd see on places like r/technology I'd see here with tons of discussion

- more political or otherwise touchy topics I replaced with tildes.net. And honestly I am the much better off for it. It is a lot quieter than Reddit, but there are very few times where I feel such topics devolve into the polarized turf wars you know r/politics to be.

- Don't browse it as much, but for memes/humor stuff Lemmy and KBin work well enough. still very much growing and I hope they can become more general purpose replacements, but for now non-meme stuff is a trickle unless it's that 1-2 posts that blow up (usually political stuff or more reddit drama... not what I go there for)

- lastly, a lot of gaming stuff I migrated to discord for. Definitely the worst experience when on large servers and it feels even noisier than Twitter. But the small community for niche genres or specific games are surprisingly cozy. It's a real mixed bag.

So I'd say it's 90% replaced. But I can also admit there are some few communities I reluctantly go back to that keep me from fully disconnecting to reddit (though, note that I deleted my account way back in February. I fully lurk):

- gamedev communities are a huge one. The best alternative to that is Twitter and... no, I still can't do Twitter/X/Whatever Musk fancies that day of the week. Never liked it before, and I'd rather deal with Reddit's madness than try to learn it in 2023 at its worst. maybe I'll try Bluesky one day, but I'm personally rooting for Mastodon (haven't checked it out myself, though).

- in a similar vein, I still find it easier to skim for industry news on r/games and related subs than to scour the net. This is definitely laziness on my end so I can't pretend to be immune from the path of least resistance. I can alleviate half of this with a proper RSS feed (never used one, but I am very curious about setting one up), but research into this really made me remember how many sites I used to discuss on removed their forums or comment sections. Or in some cases, the comments make reddit look like a bastion of nuance in comparison.

well, one day. I'm still searching in the meantime.

Re: Ask HN: What was the outcome of Reddit blackout?

#446

As a casual but persistent user, it pains me to say it - because ethically I support the grassroots side of the equation - but as a path of least resistance to casual, anonymous public engagement on a wide range of topics, there seems no viable alternative. [For a given subjective value of 'viable', naturally!]. So after a period of abstention, I gradually ended up back there, simply because I know of no other sizeab…

Looking at these posts people want to be on the "right side" of this issue and I don't get it. I still use reddit the same today as I have been for the last 10+ years (chrome + RES). /r/all is as bad as it's ever been, however my subbed feed hasn't changed much.

>Looking at these posts people want to be on the "right side" of this issue and I don't get it.

HN is a highly skewed techy community. And I imagine many are reddit vagrants as well. I see it less as "giving the right answer" and more "asking a biased audience". It's the opposite of asking people on reddit what they think of the blackout; many who stayed and never used 3rd party apps probably didn't care or even argue it was an abuse of mod power.

And of course, Reddit isn't just one website. Some places may have barely changed. Others are indeed irreparably changed. Others still are literally shut down. The question is highly sensitive to how you browse, and what you browse.

Re: Ask HN: What was the outcome of Reddit blackout?

#447
post #216

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They have a right yes, but they will also rightly suffer from their approach. I not only participated in the blackout, but because of the CEOs arrogant comments about how valuable my data is and how they deserve to sell it, while destroying the tools I value and use, I also deleted all of my valuable data from reddit and after handing off the one sub I moderated I left the platform forever. I think reddit is a wonder…

I'm a blogger and freelance writer. I've spent years saying that programmers make good money, then expect slave labor from writers and content developers. If the only way people will "allow" a valuable service to live is as their bitch, the entire internet is welcome to go die in a fire while we dream up some new answer for the future of this world.

>I've spent years saying that programmers make good money, then expect slave labor from writers and content developers.

I guess. They have very different histories and it's not like programmers are strangers to doing "free work" (i.e. the entire open source community until the Github era). the narrative would be flipped 30 years ago. I'm not quite sure how that is relevant.

>If the only way people will "allow" a valuable service to live is as their bitch, the entire internet is welcome to go die in a fire while we dream up some new answer for the future of this world.

sure. pay your labor. I don't think we disagree.

But the issue isn't that reddit doesn't make millions. It's that it's obsessed with spending 10's of millions in hopes of making hundreds of millions off of content provided via free labor. I just want to browse some news and discuss with people. HN doesn't cost millions in server costs and performs that perfectly for me.

If I had a nice cozy forum I wouldn't mind a subscription to it. I paid my 10 bux to SA back in the day and I donated to Tildes for a few years. But I do agree many would rather let the internet burn than pay for a site directly.

Re: Ask HN: What was the outcome of Reddit blackout?

#448

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I've spent years saying that programmers make good money, then expect slave labor from writers and content developers. > If people don't want to be unpaid XXX, they don't have to be. No one forced them into that Insert blogger/writer/mod for xxx. Maybe it would help, if this contradiction is clarified.

There's no contradiction. "I can choose to work for free on some things if I wish." does not contradict "Other folks are in the wrong to expect and demand that I work for free."

how is this relevant to Reddit (a tech site in SV) having the right to monetize off of other people's passion, though? And who is expecting and demanding what?

Re: Ask HN: What was the outcome of Reddit blackout?

#449

Nothing, some of us already knew nothing would come of it. People are just so dramatic and they don't understand the services they're using. Most people have no idea what's behind reddit, facebook, youtube. They just see a free shiny thing and start using it. Then one day the free shiny thing has a gross ad on it, and one day it has another one, and before they know it, it's unusable.

>People are just so dramatic and they don't understand the services they're using.

At the same time, people are so fixated with "X killer [no, not the twitter thing]" that they can't see the small victories when a site with 1000 people grows to 10k people. 10x growth is insane but it can be swept away if all they see is a 0.02% drop in reddit traffic to achieve that.

So much better to celebrate the growths than to chant at the downfalls. downfalls are good popcorn drama, especially these days, but doesn't really solve the problem.

Re: Ask HN: What was the outcome of Reddit blackout?

#450
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Strongly disagree, it was very impactful to me. A few communities I really liked and used for support up and left to other platforms, leading to other issues. I tried to follow some of them but it didn't work. My take away of the blackout is "reddit broke, lots of the good people left, life is more lonely as a result".

Lots of bad people left too, which is probably a net good for reddit even if the number is lopsided for one or the other.

never considered if it was better or worse for trolls to be replaced by bots. Interesting philisophical question with no good answer. Though I'm sure someone will quickly point out some sci-fi novel that delved into such subjects.

Fallout 4 very loosely covers this, but doesn't dive at all into the social implications, since the concept wasn't the endgoal.

Post reply on HN