Live data from Hacker News

Linexjlin/GPTs: leaked prompts of GPTs

github.com

41–50 of 62 posts

Re: Linexjlin/GPTs: leaked prompts of GPTs

#41

GPTs feels like such a half-baked idea. ChatGPT is still very squarely an experimentation/ideation product. Productizing the core functionality wrapped around a flimsy prompt with a non-deterministic input and can easily be hacked doesn't seem like a good focus for OpenAI right now.

It's an MVP I belive

Re: Linexjlin/GPTs: leaked prompts of GPTs

#42
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It seems like a great starting point for an idea, but it also seems like they (/Mr Altman) just leapt with it too early in an effort to gain some FMA or keep the hype going…? Even the name ‘GPT Store’ sounds a bit too much like something ChatGPT itself would come up with. It sounds like a parody of a product announcement!

FMA?

I wrote a GPT for that! https://chat.openai.com/g/g-3V1JcLD92-dejargonizer (Notes on how that works are here: https://simonwillison.net/2023/Nov/15/gpts/#dejargonizer)

I fed it that comment and it said:

> FMA: This acronym can have several meanings, but in this context, it likely stands for "First Mover Advantage." This business term refers to the benefits gained by a company that is the first to enter a new market or develop a new product or technology.

Re: Linexjlin/GPTs: leaked prompts of GPTs

#43
post #3

This is new to me, so I might be wrong, but I don't get why they share revenue with the creators of these GPTs. They are basically just prompts that consist of a few sentences. There's no value add, and the more ChatGPT improves the less prompting will be required. These GPTs feel closer to bookmarks than an actual program.

> there’s no value add

That’s for the customer to decide. They increase overall revenue, that’s why revenue is being shared.

Re: Linexjlin/GPTs: leaked prompts of GPTs

#44
One of the ways we are creating a closed domain internal bot is by never relaying the user input as it is & combining it with vector search on hypothetical questions & limited user input. Kinda like induction. Along with making the model not use general knowledge & just the context strictly.

Re: Linexjlin/GPTs: leaked prompts of GPTs

#45
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

GPTs are apps. They are a prompt, files (up to 10 files, 200 MB each, automatically indexed into a vector DB) a Linux VM that can run code based on prompts or code you attach, can call any web API—-I made a gmail one for myself—and have access to GPT-4V, DALL-E, and Bing Search. You can mash all that up in really creative ways, then press one button to publish and get a link you can share. The VM can easily do things…

What does your “Gmail” GPT do and what do you use it for?

I haven’t done much with it yet but it’s fun to play with.

So far one thing that was nice is “look up the tracking number for the thing I just bought”

I’ll probably play around with Bard’s gmail integration to find more use cases.

Re: Linexjlin/GPTs: leaked prompts of GPTs

#46
post #3

This is new to me, so I might be wrong, but I don't get why they share revenue with the creators of these GPTs. They are basically just prompts that consist of a few sentences. There's no value add, and the more ChatGPT improves the less prompting will be required. These GPTs feel closer to bookmarks than an actual program.

> They are basically just prompts that consist of a few sentences. There's no value add, and the more ChatGPT improves the less prompting will be required. These GPTs feel closer to bookmarks than an actual program. So basically every ChatGPT wrapper startup

Exactly why the existential panic those startups experienced when this was announced

Re: Linexjlin/GPTs: leaked prompts of GPTs

#47
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What does your “Gmail” GPT do and what do you use it for?

I haven’t done much with it yet but it’s fun to play with. So far one thing that was nice is “look up the tracking number for the thing I just bought” I’ll probably play around with Bard’s gmail integration to find more use cases.

Is that the sort of thing they would actually let you publish? Seems like inexperienced users might wind up really screwing up their inbox.

Re: Linexjlin/GPTs: leaked prompts of GPTs

#48
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What does your “Gmail” GPT do and what do you use it for?

I haven’t done much with it yet but it’s fun to play with. So far one thing that was nice is “look up the tracking number for the thing I just bought” I’ll probably play around with Bard’s gmail integration to find more use cases.

How did you give it access to your inbox? Does it use the Code Interpreter with the Gmail API, and ask for your credentials, or something?

Re: Linexjlin/GPTs: leaked prompts of GPTs

#49
post #3

This is new to me, so I might be wrong, but I don't get why they share revenue with the creators of these GPTs. They are basically just prompts that consist of a few sentences. There's no value add, and the more ChatGPT improves the less prompting will be required. These GPTs feel closer to bookmarks than an actual program.

Not all GPTs are just prompts. You can create GPTs that include uploaded content or code. A GPT I created for my own use invokes a Python function to do something GPT-4 cannot do itself. Other GPTs include knowledge bases.

Can you share your use case with the Python function?

Re: Linexjlin/GPTs: leaked prompts of GPTs

#50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not all GPTs are just prompts. You can create GPTs that include uploaded content or code. A GPT I created for my own use invokes a Python function to do something GPT-4 cannot do itself. Other GPTs include knowledge bases.

Can you share your use case with the Python function?

The first line of my prompt is:

  Create a diagram in mermaid syntax based on what the user asked. Pass the code to the create_mermaid_link function below to get a link to Mermaid Live. Display the clickable link to the user.
The prompt has more detail that tells it what types of diagrams to prefer, what types of escaping to use, how to order lines etc.

The file I uploaded contains the create_mermaid_link() function, which relies on being able to base64 encode a string.

Post reply on HN