Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What photo sharing solution should we use for our destination wedding?

news.ycombinator.com

31–35 of 35 posts

Re: Ask HN: What photo sharing solution should we use for our destination wedding?

#31

Nowadays you can upload HD photos via WhatsApp. That is the easiest solution. For building projects, we shared photos and videos with Cluster. See: https://cluster.co/

Re: WhatsApp - Oh my gosh - you are right! Thank you so much!

It's slightly annoying that it's not possible to set that to default, and I reckon a lot of guests won't remember or bother to change that each time, but it's great to know that.

Re: Ask HN: What photo sharing solution should we use for our destination wedding?

#32
While not perfect, you may want to consider Dropbox request links.

You first create a file request link and share this link with everyone. They can go to this link using their phone browser (or a browser on any device) and upload files (full high resolution files). Files automatically go into this "request" folder on your account. You can then share this folder out and have it viewable at another link.

You may want to set up couple URL redirections to these two link like mywedding.com/upload and mywedding.com/shared to make things easier and not have people asking for the link 100 times.

Re: Ask HN: What photo sharing solution should we use for our destination wedding?

#34

It is something wedding photographers should offer. I've seen wedding photographers expand the traditional model and set up Purikura so people can take their own group photos: https://www.jrpass.com/blog/say-cheese-the-ultimate-guide-to... Pro photographers are ideally equipped for some the tough problems in wedding photography (the reception dinner that is poorly lit, large group photos, etc.) but there is going to…

Anecdotal perspective: As a user, I hate these third-party services because they can't make use of the built-in features of photo sharing apps that Google and Apple already make. You have to go through some pain in the ass individual (or bulk select) upload process, deal with a long-running thread in your browser (which may be interrupted and may or may not gracefully resume), etc.

vs like in Google Photos, you just hold-select a bunch of photos you already took (and probably auto-synced to the cloud), add them to the shared album... and done! No additional friction and no re-uploading needed.

-----------

That said, I don't know if that's a common enough workflow for your average non-HN, non-power-user =/ It's possible people don't even know that feature exists.

Re: Ask HN: What photo sharing solution should we use for our destination wedding?

#35
I wouldn’t call Shared Albums in Apple Photos high quality (and certainly not original quality). Unlike in Google Photos, sharing to Apple’s Shared Albums creates a separate scaled down copy of the photo instead of creating permissions to see the original photo.

It’s super frustrating.

Post reply on HN