Live data from Hacker News

Ubuntu squeezes more performance than Windows 11 on new AMD Zen 4 Threadripper

phoronix.com

391–400 of 411 posts

Re: Ubuntu squeezes more performance than Windows 11 on new AMD Zen 4 Threadripper

#391
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I blame Windows Defender (anti-virus). It's the first thing I disable whenever I want to do some serious disk I/O. Also Windows still uses NTFS which dates back to 2000. For compatibility reasons, fair enough. But surely NTFS wasn't designed with SSDs in mind, let alone NVMEs.

NTFS has had several updates over the years, and supports trim just fine. Of course, that doesn't make it comparable to ext4 or zfs or whatever, but I wouldn't expect it to be the worst bottleneck in the system.

TRIM has nothing to do with performance. It’s for longevity of the disk.

Re: Ubuntu squeezes more performance than Windows 11 on new AMD Zen 4 Threadripper

#392
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I blame Windows Defender (anti-virus). It's the first thing I disable whenever I want to do some serious disk I/O. Also Windows still uses NTFS which dates back to 2000. For compatibility reasons, fair enough. But surely NTFS wasn't designed with SSDs in mind, let alone NVMEs.

> I blame Windows Defender (anti-virus). It would be nice if Windows Defender tone down their on-the-fly aggressive scanning for anything I/O related. For any I/O activity, it regularly consumes up to 30% of my CPU. Moving files to a different directory rev up Windows Defender even it scans the folder in the past. I wish there is a granular control over Windows Defenders in a way that it would not be aggressive with…

The solution is to not use windows.

Re: Ubuntu squeezes more performance than Windows 11 on new AMD Zen 4 Threadripper

#393
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have a Zen 2 Threadripper box that I dual boot (it's a workstation for coding that I sometimes play games on), and I can confirm. I don't know what the exact technical reason is or why nobody in Redmond is embarrassed. But anything relating to the filesystem is simply dog-slow on Windows, and the more high-end your system is, the more this becomes the major bottleneck.

IIRC there is a filesystem filter on windows where various apps like antivirus hook themselves, which was why filesystem access under WSL1 actually faster than windows.

Isn’t this hilarious? In order to achieve high performance on windows you need to access your file system via a virtual machine. Typically it’s the other way around.

Re: Ubuntu squeezes more performance than Windows 11 on new AMD Zen 4 Threadripper

#394
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Cyberpunk runs exactly 3fps lower on NixOS than on windows during benchmarks on ultra, with dlss and ray tracing. Totally negligible performance difference but being on Linux is not.

Not sure how this is supposed to answer what I wrote, but okay, thanks for the information.

If a game that runs bleeding edge features on windows can be made to run on Linux, then it’s safe to say that anything can run on Linux.

If autocad or photoshop don’t work it’s not because Linux can’t handle it, it’s because the authors of those programs don’t want you to. It’s DRM, every time; not some limitation on what wine can do.

Re: Ubuntu squeezes more performance than Windows 11 on new AMD Zen 4 Threadripper

#395
post #300

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why not a stable distro with KDE for Windows convert? KDE is the closest thing that looks like Windows.

Linux Mint also looks pretty close to Windows, and they seem to explicitly try to accommodate Windows-experienced folks, with a lot of preinstalled tools and a similar UX. I run NixOS with KDE on both my desktop and laptop, and whilst it is closer to Windows than Gnome is, its not as close as Mint, or rather, Cinnamon. KDE looks close to Windows with the default UI, but the UX differences are more noticeable. Another…

What makes me stay on KDE is the file manager (Dolphin), it's even better than the Windows one.

I would be on Gnome otherwise, but its file manager is for people that don't actually manage files. It's quasi useless (at least for my needs).

Re: Ubuntu squeezes more performance than Windows 11 on new AMD Zen 4 Threadripper

#396

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Apart from Nvidia, this feels like a non-issue for me nowadays.

I’m running Nvidia on Wayland (Fedora) without issue. Recentish (3 year old laptop in my case) card. Games work great via Proton. I can’t complain.

Which Wayland compositor? Does it matter? I recently got an Intel iGPU + Nvidia dGPU machine.

Re: Ubuntu squeezes more performance than Windows 11 on new AMD Zen 4 Threadripper

#397

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Apart from Nvidia, this feels like a non-issue for me nowadays.

People want to game, and a lot of gamers want Nvidia. The driver may or may not work, but if it has a reputation for maybe not working, people will decide against it. It also possible that people who find out the Nvidia cards are unreliable on Linux are making decisions over other systems where this shouldn't be such a big deal.

Nvidia cards being unreliable on Linux make me choose an other card instead.

Re: Ubuntu squeezes more performance than Windows 11 on new AMD Zen 4 Threadripper

#398

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes! Downloading things in Firefox has been annoying too now that you mention it.

I know what you meant but generally really unfair to even mention or phrase it like that. “Downloading things in snap” is more correct. Snap has done such a disservice to open source software’s perceived quality.

Ok.

Re: Ubuntu squeezes more performance than Windows 11 on new AMD Zen 4 Threadripper

#399
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Perhaps I should have chosen another flavor? That'll ignite a holy war. The trick with linux isn't to learn the flavour, it's to learn linux - once you get an overview of how all the bits work then switching distro is (much) more straightforward. Ubuntu is an excellent first choice because it's one of the major distro's so you'll be able to google stuff more easily. My personal recommendation would be Fedora (and i…

Where do I learn modern desktop Linux? I am using it on servers since 1993 and used for desktop 2004-2017 (and was very unhappy with it) so my desktop knowledge is severely outdated.

[deleted]

Re: Ubuntu squeezes more performance than Windows 11 on new AMD Zen 4 Threadripper

#400
post #326

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The end user experience is way better on Windows than Linux. And I say that as someone who uses Linux (Ubuntu Gnome) daily. You really have to appreciate the freedom of choice that FOSS brings you to appreciate Linux. If you don't care, as most people do, you're probably better off with Windows. Ofcourse you can counter my reasoning by listing a lot of problems with Windows. And I can assure you that most people don'…

I agreed with this for a long time, but in the past 4ish years I no longer agree. On Windows I regularly run into frustrating issues with audio, drivers, printers, random odd errors. On linux (currently PoP OS, first on a System76, now a Dell) I have not been running into issues. The biggest issue I ran into was strange Wifi connection issues, which System76 had me submit logs for and identified it as a failed Wifi c…

I'll reinforce what the parent is saying: for most users, Windows just works. Although I don't like Macs too much, they also just work.

I'm a Linux fan, but I can get myself productive in a new Windows install with no grief. For Linux, I always need to go online to remember "that config change" I had to make to get things working for me - and even then, from time to time I still have to tweak and work around a problem or two as I add more stuff to my computer. What you just wrote as your biggest issue is actually a fairly common Linux experience - submit or search logs from some piece of hardware to diagnose some little glitch.

I'm willing to put on the time, but my nobody else in my family is.

Post reply on HN