Earlier quoted context omitted.
Genuinely curious here: why not keypass?
This is an odd question, bc it seems to assume my road to enpass would have to go through an evaluation of keypass.
Bitwarden is down with blank screen under Linux OpenSuse
51–54 of 54 posts
Re: Bitwarden is down with blank screen under Linux OpenSuse
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
The container is easier. Veracrypt container DOS formatted is easier and more portable than GPG.
Look you have to be more precise everyone was thinking you're talking about Docker/Podman. >>and more portable than GPG. LLM's have hallucination too ;)
Re: Bitwarden is down with blank screen under Linux OpenSuse
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
Great solution if didn’t use a smartphone.
GPG was suggested as an alternative to: > Keep a 50 megabyte encrypted container around for it. Mount, export, unmount Which of the options do you think would be easier to work with on your smartphone? The are many PGP implementations for smartphones in the case you have to recover. Just move the file.
Re: Bitwarden is down with blank screen under Linux OpenSuse
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is an odd question, bc it seems to assume my road to enpass would have to go through an evaluation of keypass.
It's just that keypass seems to me more reknown (I had never heard of Enpass before), so I would have assumed one would have compared both before choosing one or the other. I was then wondering what were the benefits of Enpass over Keypass. Not that I have any preference or bias: I know keypass and wondered how it compared to a similar solution.
It doesn't support the platforms I use, so it's a nonstarter.