11–20 of 36 posts
I know it depends on the analysis, but I often am doing somewhat embarassingly parallel things. So just knowing GNU parallel for mid-scale things (and R/python basically parallelism, although shared memory is a bear), and how to temporarily scale across the cloud to like 500 core, is huge.
Is MPI still widely used?
What would replace it?
Is MPI still widely used?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The book is in C, not R
It says R there. There is even a chapter named "Why R" explaining why R was the choose language for the book.
If you feel like you've finally groked GPU/massive parallel software programming and need more challenges, I highly recommend playing around with digital circuits! The level of parallelism available to you in hardware is truly unmatched and it's incredibly fun, especially once you start really pushing implementations of your designs on FPGAs. Granted, FPGAs are frequently less useful than what you could do on a GPU d…
I know it depends on the analysis, but I often am doing somewhat embarassingly parallel things. So just knowing GNU parallel for mid-scale things (and R/python basically parallelism, although shared memory is a bear), and how to temporarily scale across the cloud to like 500 core, is huge.
Fwiw, a single u-12tb1.112xlarge has 448 cores.
I know it depends on the analysis, but I often am doing somewhat embarassingly parallel things. So just knowing GNU parallel for mid-scale things (and R/python basically parallelism, although shared memory is a bear), and how to temporarily scale across the cloud to like 500 core, is huge.
500 cores is just a handful of nodes nowadays. Living in the future is weird.
If you feel like you've finally groked GPU/massive parallel software programming and need more challenges, I highly recommend playing around with digital circuits! The level of parallelism available to you in hardware is truly unmatched and it's incredibly fun, especially once you start really pushing implementations of your designs on FPGAs. Granted, FPGAs are frequently less useful than what you could do on a GPU d…
How do you get started with that?
If you feel like you've finally groked GPU/massive parallel software programming and need more challenges, I highly recommend playing around with digital circuits! The level of parallelism available to you in hardware is truly unmatched and it's incredibly fun, especially once you start really pushing implementations of your designs on FPGAs. Granted, FPGAs are frequently less useful than what you could do on a GPU d…
How do you get started with that?