Live data from Hacker News

Victor Mono Typeface

rubjo.github.io

41–50 of 154 posts

Re: Victor Mono Typeface

#41
It's amazing we have so many high quality open source fonts / independent effort working on them nowadays.

Also a big fan of condensed mono fonts

Oreilly used to use "The Sans Mono Condensed" which is amazing.

Other favorites of mine: PragmataPro (paid), Iosevka Comfy Fixed , M Plus 50 (free).

Anyone has other recommendation for good condensed fonts ? (Especially Serif / Sans)

Re: Victor Mono Typeface

#42
Cool typeface, but pretty illegible to me (I realize this is very personal). I don't think my eyes could handle this for more than a few minutes. That's the thing about typefaces — there are typefaces that are far "prettier" and more interesting than the ones I use, but they don't scale in the sense that they just can't be used as your daily driver. Good typefaces for all day programming strike a balance between style, legibility and "plainness" that makes them suitable for staring at all day every day.

Re: Victor Mono Typeface

#43

I'm curious, does anybody else change their terminal/editor font about once every two months only to immediately decide."no I don't like change" and go back to their standard? (In my case JetBrains Mono) I'd don't know if it's that I genuinely prefer that font, or just that I've spent so long looking at it my brain can't handle anything else.

I tried a bunch, wasn't quite happy until I found Comic Mono.

It's unironically is the superior programming font if you have dyslexia. Makes an enormous difference in my reading speed.

Re: Victor Mono Typeface

#44

I'm generally pretty supportive of new typefaces, but this one strikes me as... not very legible. The x-height is so uncommonly high it makes it genuinely difficult to distinguish between uppercase/ascending and lowercase letters at a glance (e.g. 'U' vs 'u', or 'h' vs. 'n'), and similarly the descender is so tiny it makes it hard to distinguish certain letters at a glance (e.g. 'q' vs 'p'). The whole point of large-…

[flagged]

I don't think the 3-4 well-presented arguments that the OP is making would be considered an 'essay'. Do you have any counter-arguments or you just feel offended by their comment?

Re: Victor Mono Typeface

#45

I'm generally pretty supportive of new typefaces, but this one strikes me as... not very legible. The x-height is so uncommonly high it makes it genuinely difficult to distinguish between uppercase/ascending and lowercase letters at a glance (e.g. 'U' vs 'u', or 'h' vs. 'n'), and similarly the descender is so tiny it makes it hard to distinguish certain letters at a glance (e.g. 'q' vs 'p'). The whole point of large-…

Typeface designer here. Thanks for trying the font and having lots of thoughts about it.

I guess the point is that it wasn’t first and foremost designed to follow as many font design principles as possible. If that’s what’s important to you, pick a font that follows as many of these principles as possible. :D

In the end, I guess I don’t really care whether I use 157ms to parse a sentence instead of 158 - although to me, the font is absolutely super-legible.

Re: Victor Mono Typeface

#46

Does anyone know where the use of cursive-style characters in monospace fonts originated from? (My guess would be that it came from something like Operator Mono from Hoefler & Co.) I've always found the cursive to be a little jarring, since the cursive characters usually look so different from the normal ones, and switching between cursive and normal styles makes it slower for me to visually parse a section of code.…

IBM had a cursive font for typewriters

Yup, IBM Selectric Scribe (towards the bottom of the page):

http://luc.devroye.org/fonts-44934.html

It was a bit of a "novelty" font for typewriters. Almost like the Comic Sans of its day. It wasn't meant to be used as italics, it was for typing a fun invitation or more "personal" letter or something like that.

I can't find any information on it specifically though, whether it was the first. It wouldn't surprise me if it were, however.

Re: Victor Mono Typeface

#47

Sorry, ligatures are not for me. I don't get it. Why would you ever want symbols to collapse like that in a functional monospace font? Just looks like a bunch of funky unicode characters peppered throughout my source. And my caret can travel _inside_ one of these special marks? No thanks.

Ok. Well maybe disable them, then.

Re: Victor Mono Typeface

#49

This looks nice and clean, I like it. I'll give it a shot and do the Pepsi challenge against my current favorite, JetBrains Mono [0]. I also like the play on Hamburgevons [1] for the examples--one of them is OldButSanePotus . 0: https://www.jetbrains.com/lp/mono/ 1: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamburgevons

Ha ha good catch ;)

Re: Victor Mono Typeface

#50
post #45

I'm generally pretty supportive of new typefaces, but this one strikes me as... not very legible. The x-height is so uncommonly high it makes it genuinely difficult to distinguish between uppercase/ascending and lowercase letters at a glance (e.g. 'U' vs 'u', or 'h' vs. 'n'), and similarly the descender is so tiny it makes it hard to distinguish certain letters at a glance (e.g. 'q' vs 'p'). The whole point of large-…

Typeface designer here. Thanks for trying the font and having lots of thoughts about it. I guess the point is that it wasn’t first and foremost designed to follow as many font design principles as possible. If that’s what’s important to you, pick a font that follows as many of these principles as possible. :D In the end, I guess I don’t really care whether I use 157ms to parse a sentence instead of 158 - although to…

I'm surprised you as a typeface designer are not interested in what end-users(aren't they the customers?) are saying about the font. This means, assuming good intent, that's not where the money is coming from.

Can someone shed some light on who pays typeface designers and what are the incentives like?

Post reply on HN