Earlier quoted context omitted.
I guess we'll see much faster enshittification now? Buy 100 prompts now with AIBucks! Loot box prompts! Get 10 AI ultramax level prompts with your purchase of 5 new PromptSkin themes to customize your AI buddy! Pre-order the NEW UltraThink AI and get an exclusive UltraPrompt skin and 25 AIBucks!
Altman was the one who stood to benefit financially from OpenAI selling out. The rest of the board do not have equity in the company. If anything we'll see a reversal of the whole "Open"(to paying customers)AI
Greg Brockman quits OpenAI
231–240 of 701 posts
Re: Greg Brockman quits OpenAI
#232What an unbelievable turn of events! To the outside observer, OpenAI is one of the most successful, well-oiled machines, shipping nearly weekly and doing an unbelievably good job marketing itself. Clearly, there's a lot of turmoil going on behind the scenes.
Re: Greg Brockman quits OpenAI
#233Earlier quoted context omitted.
Smells like XYZ agencies, or some white gloves.
No, all native Californians are like this (this just replaces hippie Buddhism with hippie computer worship) and the singularity stuff is the reason OpenAI was founded in the first place. And the reason Elon is mad at them, because they pivoted from it.
Re: Greg Brockman quits OpenAI
#234Earlier quoted context omitted.
No I don’t think that’s what happened at all. Also memorizing code and rewriting it is very much IP theft.
Is it? Seriously, I’m asking. Like… if you were an engineer that worked on UNIX System V at AT&T/Bell Labs and contributed code to the BSDs from memory alone, would you really be liable?
So unless any of the necessary bits are patented, I highly doubt an argument against them starting a new company will hold in the courts.
Sometimes the contracts can include a cool-down period before a person can seek employment in the same industry/niche, I don’t think that will apply in Sam’s case - as he was a founder.
Also - the wanting to get himself fired intentionally argument doesn’t have any substance. What will he gain from that? If anything, him leaving on his own terms sounds like a much stronger argument. I don’t buy the getting-fired-and-having-no-choice-but-to-start-an-AGI-company argument.
An interesting twist would be if he joins Elon in his pursuit. Pure speculation, sharing it just for amusement. I don’t think they’ll ever work together. Can’t have two people calling the shots at the top. Leaves employees confused and rarely ever works. Probably not very good for their own mental health either.
Re: Greg Brockman quits OpenAI
#235I think I see it now. Speculation following: They achieved AGI internally, but didn't want OpenAI to have it. All the important people will move to another company, following Sam, and OpenAI is left with nothing more than a rotting GPT. They planned all this from the start, which is why Sam didn't care about equity or long-term finances. They spent all the money in this one-shot gamble to achieve AGI, which can be re…
Interesting view - I, and many others presumably, would really like more insight into the source and nature of this speculation. I am not dismissing the possibility, far from it. It sounds very plausible. But are there any credible reports to back it up?
It's just a fun theory, which I think is plausible. It's based on my personal view of how Sam Altman operates, i.e. very smart, very calculative, makes big gambles for the "greater purpose".
Re: Greg Brockman quits OpenAI
#236Maybe something to do with this? https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/QDczBduZorG4dxZiW/sam-altman...
No, I'm confident that it has nothing to do with that. It must have to do with the current business. Maybe there's a financial conflict of interest. Maybe he's been hiding the severity of losses from the board. Maybe something else. But you don't fire a CEO because you discover that he committed a crime at age 13.
Re: Greg Brockman quits OpenAI
#237Earlier quoted context omitted.
Don’t you know? Random twitter guy has thoughts on $Current_Event and a witty quip about the “vibes”. It’s crucial we post this without context to the discussion
Nobody knows who he is but this is the latest in a series of correct leaks he's made at Open AI for months now. Fair enough I didn't expand but "Jimmy Apples" of all people being unphased by this revelation that supposedly even Microsoft was unaware of is the funniest timeline.
Re: Greg Brockman quits OpenAI
#238So is this the way the government takes control of the AI, next OpenAI will have new but familiar owners from Raytheon and the other Pentagon crowd?
The US has never spent less on its military than it does now, and the military industrial complex has never been less important, because the rest of the economy has grown so much larger. So it's funny to see people still using Cold War-era conspiracy theories from when it actually mattered.
Re: Greg Brockman quits OpenAI
#239I found the lack of information of the CTO and certain board members disturbing. Like, who is Mira Murati? We only now that she came from Albania (one of the poorest countries) and somehow got into some pretty good private schools, and then to pretty good companies. Who are her parents? What kind of connections does she pull?
Why is the fact that she is unknown disturbing?
Re: Greg Brockman quits OpenAI
#240Earlier quoted context omitted.
Microsoft has zero ownership of the entity the board controls (the OpenAI nonprofit), and a for-profit firm having seats on a nonprofit board especially if it was because they invested in a for-profit subsidiary of the nonprofit would raise serious issues of the “nonprofit” being run for purposes incompatible with its status.
Sure; but its still weird that Microsoft agreed to the deal with the board in the state that it was; not just no board seat, but three absolute outsiders, two of them extremely unqualified. We may look back on their decision to buy 49% of OpenAI as a big misstep.