Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Usually they just vote their friends on You actually think that for-profit corporate boards are significantly different, especially in the startup/early IPO phase?
Sure, the investors own the company and the board answers to them. Nonprofits are significantly disconnected from their own financial incentives. I have witnessed it at every nonprofit I have worked for.
Greg Brockman quits OpenAI
141–150 of 701 posts
Re: Greg Brockman quits OpenAI
#142Earlier quoted context omitted.
He was chairman of the board, no? surely he was in the meeting? More likely it's some kind of schism and he was on Sam's side.
Just guessing here, but I think the board can form a quorum without the chair, and vote, and as long as they have a majority, i think they can proceed with a press release based on their vote.
Re: Greg Brockman quits OpenAI
#143nice, hope there are openings in high level positions and they switch to remote I’m never going back to Noe Valley for less than $500,000/yr and a netjets membership
You willing to slum it in a shared seat that has supported other billionaires' behinds? I wouldn't ... but you do you!
I wouldn't move back to San Francisco anywhere and hybrid would be a midweek affair
Re: Greg Brockman quits OpenAI
#144Earlier quoted context omitted.
Lolwut? Who is Jimmy Apples?
Founder of e/acc movement.
Re: Greg Brockman quits OpenAI
#145What an unbelievable turn of events! To the outside observer, OpenAI is one of the most successful, well-oiled machines, shipping nearly weekly and doing an unbelievably good job marketing itself. Clearly, there's a lot of turmoil going on behind the scenes.
Re: Greg Brockman quits OpenAI
#146Greg is the one who announced GPT-4. Sam enabled Greg and vice-versa. The next AI winter may have just begun...
Re: Greg Brockman quits OpenAI
#147So is this the way the government takes control of the AI, next OpenAI will have new but familiar owners from Raytheon and the other Pentagon crowd?
Re: Greg Brockman quits OpenAI
#148This all seems so weird, and the list of Board members doesn't make this any easier to understand. Apart from the 3 insiders, there are 3 other board members. 2 of them seem complete no names and might not qualify for any important corporate board. In a for profit shareholders in theory control the board, in a non profit I am not even sure of who really has control over things.
> I am not even sure of who really has control over things. Honestly, this is the big problem with Big Non Profit (tm). The entire structure of non-profits is really meant for ladies clubs, Rotary groups, and your church down the street, not openai and ikea.
Re: Greg Brockman quits OpenAI
#149This all seems so weird, and the list of Board members doesn't make this any easier to understand. Apart from the 3 insiders, there are 3 other board members. 2 of them seem complete no names and might not qualify for any important corporate board. In a for profit shareholders in theory control the board, in a non profit I am not even sure of who really has control over things.
Maybe non-profits are just frontends of some three letter agencies :)
Re: Greg Brockman quits OpenAI
#150This all seems so weird, and the list of Board members doesn't make this any easier to understand. Apart from the 3 insiders, there are 3 other board members. 2 of them seem complete no names and might not qualify for any important corporate board. In a for profit shareholders in theory control the board, in a non profit I am not even sure of who really has control over things.