Live data from Hacker News

OpenAI's board has fired Sam Altman

openai.com

461–470 of 1001 posts

Re: OpenAI's board has fired Sam Altman

#461
To me, his tweet suggests he saw it coming or perhaps it was even part of the plan for him. How else would he already know "what's next"?

These past few months his name has made its way into the mainstream. Maybe its time for him (and half the GPT eng team) to cash in?

Re: OpenAI's board has fired Sam Altman

#462
post #17

Well, this has me concerned. There were times when it felt like OpenAI at large was trying to swim one way, while Sam was trying to swim another. In those cases I always thought Sam's direction was the better one. From the outside this seems like a pretty big loss.

I dont know much but I got a hunch from his eyes

Re: OpenAI's board has fired Sam Altman

#463

manifold has some play money markets about this - pure speculation of course, although traders here do take their profit somewhat seriously https://manifold.markets/Ernie/what-will-sam-altman-be-doing... And this tag contains all the markets about him https://manifold.markets/browse?topic=sam-altman Will he end up at Grok? Why was he fired? etc.

Grok from Musk?

No lol: https://www.foxnews.com/media/elon-musk-hints-at-lawsuit-aga...

I wouldn't be surprised if the leadership direction of sam is related to the ousting.

Re: OpenAI's board has fired Sam Altman

#464
post #301

Put the pieces together: Nov 6 - OpenAI devday, with new features of build-your-own ChatGPT and more Nov 9 - Microsoft cuts employees off from ChatGPT due to "security concerns" [0] Nov 9 - OpenAI experiences severe downtime the company attributes to a "DDoS" (not the correct term for 'excess usage') [3] Nov 15 - OpenAI announce no new ChatGPT plus upgrades [1] but still allow regular signups (and still do) Nov 17 -…

I think the reason Microsoft was concerned about the new chatGPT release was due to the fact that you could prompt the model to a download link of the training files. Thus, if an employee trained a custom GPT on sensitive material you could quite easily retrieve the data.

Re: OpenAI's board has fired Sam Altman

#467
post #301

Put the pieces together: Nov 6 - OpenAI devday, with new features of build-your-own ChatGPT and more Nov 9 - Microsoft cuts employees off from ChatGPT due to "security concerns" [0] Nov 9 - OpenAI experiences severe downtime the company attributes to a "DDoS" (not the correct term for 'excess usage') [3] Nov 15 - OpenAI announce no new ChatGPT plus upgrades [1] but still allow regular signups (and still do) Nov 17 -…

> leaked a bunch of data, and it wasn't disclosed, but Microsoft knew about it

Didn't we just have a topic here on HN how not disclosing the breach within 4 days is a securities fraud? Since Nov 9 there has been more than 4 days, so either there was no (material) breach, or Microsoft committed securities fraud and somehow expects to get away with it.

Re: OpenAI's board has fired Sam Altman

#468

When is the last time an SV board fired their star CEO, even in cases of extreme and brazen impropriety, and actions harmful to their companies? If that's what happened - if they fired Altman for cause - then it's a good trend and good example for everyone.

Uber comes to mind.

Re: OpenAI's board has fired Sam Altman

#469
The following was posted by an Alex Coven on X (Twitter). I cannot verify if it is legit.

I was laid off from OpenAI today along with my boss Sam.

I was the person in charge of putting together the presentations for our board meetings.

No one has told me why I was let go but Sam texted me “wtf” and next thing I know my Slack and Gmail were disabled.

I’m now looking for a new role, so if you’re hiring for investor relations, my DMs are open!

Re: OpenAI's board has fired Sam Altman

#470

- Cant be a personal scandal, press release would be worded much more differently - Board is mostly independent and those independent dont have equity - They talk about not being candid - this is legalese for “lying” The only major thing that could warrant something like this is Sam going behind the boards back to make a decision (or make progress on a decision) that is misaligned with the Charter. Thats the only fir…

I agree this is the most likely explanation. Is it possible Sam tried to wrestle power away from the board? He wouldn't even need to sell the whole company, just enough tech for a large company to kill OpenAI.
Post reply on HN