Google cannibalizing their assets? Isn’t it a bit early for that?
1–10 of 23 posts
Re: Google cannibalizing their assets? Isn’t it a bit early for that?
#2Re: Google cannibalizing their assets? Isn’t it a bit early for that?
#3Makes perfect sense. Somebody will be providing an ad blocker no matter what. If it is Google then they get to control how it works, why it works and when it works.
Re: Google cannibalizing their assets? Isn’t it a bit early for that?
#4Re: Google cannibalizing their assets? Isn’t it a bit early for that?
#5What are some examples of companies cannibalizing their own business and suffering because of that? Has it ever happened?
The connection is pretty tenuous though - Linux may've eaten Sun's lunch anyway. But it would've been a little harder if we had to port all our #ifdef'd C++ software from Sun servers to commodity Linux Dell boxes, instead of just moving a few JAR files over.
Re: Google cannibalizing their assets? Isn’t it a bit early for that?
#6What are some examples of companies cannibalizing their own business and suffering because of that? Has it ever happened?
Sun, perhaps, with Java. Business-wise, it makes very little sense for a company that makes expensive proprietary hardware to develop a programming language that lets you write once and run anywhere. The connection is pretty tenuous though - Linux may've eaten Sun's lunch anyway. But it would've been a little harder if we had to port all our #ifdef'd C++ software from Sun servers to commodity Linux Dell boxes, instea…
Re: Google cannibalizing their assets? Isn’t it a bit early for that?
#7Makes perfect sense. Somebody will be providing an ad blocker no matter what. If it is Google then they get to control how it works, why it works and when it works.
It's been a while since I last had cause to use the google toolbar but didn't that have a adblocker?
This news doesn't seem all that surprising.
[edit]Just realised I'm mixing pop-up blockers and adblockers. I don't think this makes the parent comment any less valid.
Re: Google cannibalizing their assets? Isn’t it a bit early for that?
#8Makes perfect sense. Somebody will be providing an ad blocker no matter what. If it is Google then they get to control how it works, why it works and when it works.
Re: Google cannibalizing their assets? Isn’t it a bit early for that?
#9What are some examples of companies cannibalizing their own business and suffering because of that? Has it ever happened?
Re: Google cannibalizing their assets? Isn’t it a bit early for that?
#10Seems like a smart move to me -- getting Chrome out is strategically important -- browser diversification mitigates bigger risks, such as MS pushing a default ad blocker through ie; and helps them raise the bar on all browsers (esp. js rendering) to make their web apps run better.