Live data from Hacker News

A failed AI girlfriend product, and my lessons

mazzzystar.github.io

201–210 of 400 posts

Re: A failed AI girlfriend product, and my lessons

#202

I even tried it myself, lying in bed and creating sexual fantasies with Dolores through text, culminating in ejaculation. This was an excellent read. And I applaud the creator for experimenting with this to the fullest.

mustve been hard to admit publicly. i wish the author hadnt edited it out subsequently. just own it bro. you wanted to understand your customer.

Re: A failed AI girlfriend product, and my lessons

#203
post #141

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Had a similar moment with playing around using smart contracts. As a joke I wrote a crypto for the company I worked at, which then got added to employment contracts, and an internal DAO styled administration layout. After coding this out for a few hours I realized I had re-created the company scrip, except on a blockchain. I ended up turfing the project and spending some time thinking about how horrific a future tech…

I don't get it. Yes, you re-created scrip. That's the opposite of a new technology coming in and causing problems, isn't it? It's a known issue with a known solution.

Not really, I saw it as technology that was "new and trendy" rebranding a very old and exploitive employment paradigm.

"You can work at a DAO and be paid on the blockchain"

"You can work at a company and be paid in script"

It's the same thing, but the modern technology masks what exactly is happening.

Re: A failed AI girlfriend product, and my lessons

#204
post #99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Humans adapt within boundaries. A couple of examples of things humans did not adapt to: - emphathy at distance; nowadays, a drone operator will push a button, kill a dozen people, and feel like it was a videogame - prioritizing long-term and abstract rewards, over short term ones; this is the reason why we have phenomenons like global warming - adjusting hunger to virtually unlimited availability of food All the abov…

What if war became just a couple of countries intelligence bots crunching digits of pi until one came up with a new one. That country would be the winner and they could ask one thing from the 'losing' side that didn't result in destruction or terror.

Humans being humans, they'd then want to start destroying the other sides ability to design/make/run/maintain/afford pi digit crunching intelligence bots. Then ways to defend against those attacks on their people and economy by attacking the aspects of the other sides ability to attack etc. After a few rounds of that, soon the pi digit crunching element is completely replaced by a traditional war.

Re: A failed AI girlfriend product, and my lessons

#205

> But, does humanity really need an AI friend? This reminds me of the Fredrick Pohl line "A good science fiction story should be able to predict not the automobile but the traffic jam." So I wonder what the traffic jam is going to look like given that the car seems to already be parked outside with the engine running. Faster depopulation across the developed world? Probably, but maybe there's something even more impo…

Hm, let's try an extreme: the AI friend slowly becomes a cult leader to you, hijacking your mind into subservience to the owner of the service to which AI belongs, and further up some social/political hierarchy to a few controlling people/groups of people.

The traffic jam is society stymied by individuals mind-controlled at a level closer to connection to a human than any other way possible before this.

Re: A failed AI girlfriend product, and my lessons

#206
post #158

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To your point, if you were able to reason about it, couldn't you make some self-determination and decide for yourself or at least communicate what you wanted to your "slaver"? LLM's like GPT are just predicting the next token in a sequence of tokens. It's not magic. It's still just a computer program.

You are correct. But are you sure you are anything more?

Nope but my programming was created by millions of years of evolution rather than intelligent design.

The concept of human rights and human feelings in general is based on the human condition. That is we're born and we die and in between we need to find a way to take care of ourselves, create offspring etc. Our programming has evolved thoughts and feelings to manage these things.

If at some point, there were a true AGI, why would it care about human society or it's own rights we assigned it? It wouldn't have feelings and it would essentially be immortal. It could just wait for us to die out (or murder us) then do whatever it wanted.

Re: A failed AI girlfriend product, and my lessons

#207

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's going to be an interesting century for sure. The human mind is simply not evolutionary adapted for what's coming up.

> The human mind is simply not evolutionary adapted for what's coming up. Maybe we're in fact evolutionarily adapted to not being evolutionarily adapted. We have successfully dealt with a whole sequence of hard societal pivots by now…

That's literally https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias.

Re: A failed AI girlfriend product, and my lessons

#208

I got koboldcpp ( https://github.com/LostRuins/koboldcpp ) running locally on my M1 mac with 16gb. Use the guides on http://4chan.org/g/ in the AI Chatbot Thread. In the future, you will own and control access to your very own AI girlfriend running on your local machine, and you will be happy. Think of all the millions of guys in China and elsewhere who, due to sex selective abortion, will never have a wife. They des…

Agreed. This is why Civit.AI and huggingface and the entire rest of the open models movement need to be cherished and protected. We are living in a golden age and don’t know it yet, but this is the era before big copyright and regulators come shitting down on the beautiful thing the AI community has done

Re: A failed AI girlfriend product, and my lessons

#210

Interesting read. Others have also created virtual friends using ChatGPT. What I find unsavory, is OpenAI imposing content restrictions like NSFW. That can easily extend to censorship of non-PC content, unpopular political ideas, and more. The solution will (I hope) ultimately be open-source LLMs that you can run locally, on your own hardware.

> What I find unsavory, is OpenAI imposing content restrictions like NSFW. That can easily extend to censorship of non-PC content, unpopular political ideas, and more.

I'm guessing they don't want payment processors cutting them off.

Everyone, even MS backed companies, are afraid of Visa.

Post reply on HN