Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not naming sources is one thing, but which news stories from The Information were false? IMO they have an amazing track record, to the point where half the tech news you read is some journalist's distorted summary of something they read in The Information. There's a reason they can charge $400 per year and people pay.
I didn't say "false", I said rumors which are not possible to verify.
OpenAI offers $10M pay packages to poach Google researchers
21–30 of 54 posts
Re: OpenAI offers $10M pay packages to poach Google researchers
#22I closed three banners and a payment popup before being told I couldn’t read the entire article.
Re: OpenAI offers $10M pay packages to poach Google researchers
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
I didn't say "false", I said rumors which are not possible to verify.
The service they provide is verifying rumors, essentially. Due to the nature of the subject matter it's not possible for them to show you all the data you need to verify things yourself. If you don't want to trust their verification that's your prerogative but IMO rather silly considering their excellent past track record. And that's coming from someone who is extremely critical of most journalism these days.
this is absolute handvawing
Re: OpenAI offers $10M pay packages to poach Google researchers
#24What's the fastest way to jump this ladder. Swe at Google, cross train yourself on LLM in 20% time and at home, internal transfer, then get competing offers?
Re: OpenAI offers $10M pay packages to poach Google researchers
#25I find it hard to believe it’s the case for an average researcher, we know their pay package for most L6 engineers is a bit under 1m. But maybe a “fellow” or distinguished engineer?
But the most important point is, you don't get that money now, and maybe never. The most likely scenario where you get that kind of a payday is if they go public and if the pre-IPO pie-in-the-sky valuation holds for a good while.
It might. But it's far more of a gamble than your FAANG stock.
Re: OpenAI offers $10M pay packages to poach Google researchers
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
The service they provide is verifying rumors, essentially. Due to the nature of the subject matter it's not possible for them to show you all the data you need to verify things yourself. If you don't want to trust their verification that's your prerogative but IMO rather silly considering their excellent past track record. And that's coming from someone who is extremely critical of most journalism these days.
> IMO rather silly considering their excellent past track record this is absolute handvawing
Re: OpenAI offers $10M pay packages to poach Google researchers
#27What's the fastest way to jump this ladder. Swe at Google, cross train yourself on LLM in 20% time and at home, internal transfer, then get competing offers?
Re: OpenAI offers $10M pay packages to poach Google researchers
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
> IMO rather silly considering their excellent past track record this is absolute handvawing
Their past reporting on non-public information that I was personally familiar with has been 100% correct. This particular news about $10m packages was just corroborated independently by some well known researchers I follow on Twitter. Based on that and their prior track record of things they reported first that later became public and were true, I trust their reporting on other things I can't immediately verify.
can you post the link?
Re: OpenAI offers $10M pay packages to poach Google researchers
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not naming sources is one thing, but which news stories from The Information were false? IMO they have an amazing track record, to the point where half the tech news you read is some journalist's distorted summary of something they read in The Information. There's a reason they can charge $400 per year and people pay.
I didn't say "false", I said rumors which are not possible to verify.
Re: OpenAI offers $10M pay packages to poach Google researchers
#30theinformation.com used to open certain articles for HN readers but they stopped responding to our emails years ago