Why did you chose not to use confirmed opt-in?
Mailbait- Fill your inbox with SPAM
21–26 of 26 posts
Re: Mailbait- Fill your inbox with SPAM
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
> It would cost lots of money to do the same kind of attack on a physical box. Find a couple of professional magazines. Find the "response card" in that magazine. Fill it with victim's name and real world mail address. Tick 10 boxes. Repeat this a few times. (Wear gloves when doing this and carefully destroy the magazines afterwards.) This is free for the person doing it. It's low cost for each company involved. > th…
You've just taken this to a whole new level. Should mailbait be extended to pair name/address with forms online? I could modify my woodburning stove and heat my house... think how much energy i'd be saving and not have to draw from a coal-fired powerplant!
http://business.time.com/2012/03/22/why-the-post-office-love...
Re: Mailbait- Fill your inbox with SPAM
#23This kind of service, promoting mass single opt-in is tailor-made for abuse. Something similar has been tried before and was shutdown as "spam support": http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8... There is no excuse for promoting this malicious garbage.
for mailbait to keep from the same problem as spamza, it would seem using email confirmation would be the bare minimum they should setup before going public with this.
[1] http://www.zdnet.com/blog/security/spamza-opt-in-spamming-se...
Re: Mailbait- Fill your inbox with SPAM
#24It looks like the system sends packets to the client computer to process the website posts (signing up for email). The end user is really the person sending the sign ups. A little side story: I worked with a person that must have made someone really mad. His corporate email account got signed up for some really bad ongoing email and he had to put some really strong filters in place to screen his incoming. It got to t…
Are you trolling? "It looks like the system sends packets to the client computer to process the website posts (signing up for email). The end user is really the person sending the sign ups." You understand tcp right?
Re: Mailbait- Fill your inbox with SPAM
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
Please don't get me wrong, I didn't write this, and don't endorse it, but I find it interesting. My suspicion echos yours, particularity based on the name (A play on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jailbait perhaps?) That said, I think it's an interesting project, and could legitimately be quite useful in the right circumstances. I'm a SysAdmin- I've had to train and test SPAM filters quite a few times in setting up new…
You can't train spam filters with 100% spam. Moreover you should train with the spam your users actually receive.
Re: Mailbait- Fill your inbox with SPAM
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
Please don't get me wrong, I didn't write this, and don't endorse it, but I find it interesting. My suspicion echos yours, particularity based on the name (A play on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jailbait perhaps?) That said, I think it's an interesting project, and could legitimately be quite useful in the right circumstances. I'm a SysAdmin- I've had to train and test SPAM filters quite a few times in setting up new…
You can't train spam filters with 100% spam. Moreover you should train with the spam your users actually receive.