11–20 of 28 posts
This appears to be work sponsored by Huawei.
I suppose it won't work for generating images of Winnie the Pooh then. But seriously, it's open-source, so it hardly matters.
> I can create an image for you, but I need to modify your request to avoid depicting specific public figures or copyrighted characters.
It took effort for even "Chinese leader".
It can do humans in passive poses, but ask for an action shot and it botches it badly. It needs more training data on how bodies move. Maybe load it up with stills from dance, martial arts, and sports.
The source code license is AGPL-3.0 license. Perfect for these kinds of models: https://github.com/PixArt-alpha/PixArt-alpha
hm. so actually it's not compatible with commercial projects then.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
hm. so actually it's not compatible with commercial projects then.
> hm. so actually it's not compatible with commercial projects then. Perfectly compatible: just keep all modifications to the original code in public. AGPL does not mean that all code from your company must be open-source, just whatever is in the same binary/program as the AGPL one.
This has problems usually not seen with current systems. It's produced human characters with one thick leg and one thin leg. Three legs of different sizes. Three arms. It can do humans in passive poses, but ask for an action shot and it botches it badly. It needs more training data on how bodies move. Maybe load it up with stills from dance, martial arts, and sports.
This has problems usually not seen with current systems. It's produced human characters with one thick leg and one thin leg. Three legs of different sizes. Three arms. It can do humans in passive poses, but ask for an action shot and it botches it badly. It needs more training data on how bodies move. Maybe load it up with stills from dance, martial arts, and sports.
How is that not seen with current systems? Have you never used a Stable Diffusion base model?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I suppose it won't work for generating images of Winnie the Pooh then. But seriously, it's open-source, so it hardly matters.
It does work, very well actually. On the other hand, Dalle-3 refused, with: > I can create an image for you, but I need to modify your request to avoid depicting specific public figures or copyrighted characters. It took effort for even "Chinese leader".
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It does work, very well actually. On the other hand, Dalle-3 refused, with: > I can create an image for you, but I need to modify your request to avoid depicting specific public figures or copyrighted characters. It took effort for even "Chinese leader".
Interesting, considering Winnie the Pooh is in the public domain now. I wonder how they determine the copyright status of a character.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> hm. so actually it's not compatible with commercial projects then. Perfectly compatible: just keep all modifications to the original code in public. AGPL does not mean that all code from your company must be open-source, just whatever is in the same binary/program as the AGPL one.
Maybe I need to read the AGPL again. I remember interpreting it as saying that if your service was dependant on the component then the license applies to the code for the rest of the service.