Live data from Hacker News

A huge listserv. Each day, only one random person can write to it.

thelistserve.com

71–80 of 89 posts

Re: A huge listserv. Each day, only one random person can write to it.

#71

http://play-fame.com is a similar premise for Twitter. As recommendation algorithms and walled gardens fragment and homogenize our private online bubbles, perhaps these "anti-recommendation"/serendipity apps will help broaden people's horizons.

That's a novel idea. I'd like to see a webservice that keeps track of what I look at and intentionally shows me things that aren't like that.

Re: A huge listserv. Each day, only one random person can write to it.

#72
post #11

Pretty cool... are you planning to switch from Mailchimp, though? It lists $240/month as the fee for 25K-50K subscribers. I'm curious about the business model behind something like this.

joshbegley 4 hours ago | link [dead]

great question. we'd like to. have any ideas for the most inexpensive service? we don't have a business model (and don't plan to serve ads)...we just want to see what happens.

Re: A huge listserv. Each day, only one random person can write to it.

#74
post #34

This is not going to end well. Mark my words. Temptation to game an access to a 1 mil opt-in mail list is very real. From auctioning a chance to write, to product placements, to ads, to god knows what else. That's not to get into messages on highly controversial subjects.

FWIW, I pretty much solely signed up to see what "interesting" emergent behaviors get displayed. I _want_ it to be creatively gamed. So long as the list sticks to it's "one mail per day" claim, I'm perfectly happy to sign up for "one creative possible spam email per day".

If it turns out dull, I'll just unsubscribe (and, if it turns out dull _and_ malicious about not unsubbing, I'll just filter it like all the other spam)

Re: A huge listserv. Each day, only one random person can write to it.

#75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hellbanned means the poster sees his own comments as normal, but no one else can see them. Someone who is hellbanned typically does not know they are banned until someone tells them (or they eventually get suspicious of no one commenting on their comments or up/downvoting). Frankly I find the idea of hellbanning childish, but it has a long history on the internet.

You mean for people like Losethos?

Poor guy, I used to be like that. That's a type of brain washing only Reddit/Athiesm/ and 4chan/b/ can fix.

Re: A huge listserv. Each day, only one random person can write to it.

#76

Seems like one of the people behind this, joshbegley, is hellbanned on HN. His comments on this page so far are just showing up dead. Any ideas as to why this is? It makes me wonder about entering my email address on his site. Edit: If you don't have showdead on, he says that plus signs are now accepted in email addresses[0], and that they won't be serving ads, and are looking for an inexpensive way to send mail[1].…

Email with a "+" sign still not working as of 12:00 Wednesday morning.

Re: A huge listserv. Each day, only one random person can write to it.

#77
post #5

Tried to enter an email address with a '+' sign in it: "Email address is invalid". No it's not.

Around 20% of the web still tells me my dan@dangrossman.info e-mail address is invalid. .info domains have been around for 11 years now, and I can't work around these sites by removing a character.

It will get fixed once companies start to use custom top level domains, at least for anyone wanting to support such custom domain names.

More realistly there will be unmaintained sites running old email validation coed for decades.

Re: A huge listserv. Each day, only one random person can write to it.

#78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You mean for people like Losethos?

I'm not familiar with Losethos...mind explaining? A particularly egregious user?

He wrote a 64 bit OS from scratch where the shell uses C as it's scripting language, and I believe everything runs in Ring 0. Also no protected or virtual memory. So if you go over on an array index, well you could screw up some of the kernel memory space. Brilliant, but crazy. See above, and read some of his comments. He seems to be some sort of fundamentalist christian, and IIRC his comments were about saving everyone though Jesus or some such thing.

Re: A huge listserv. Each day, only one random person can write to it.

#79
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not childish, it's used to defeat trolls. If you ban a troll, they'll realize it next time they try to log in and it says "YOU HAVE BEEN BANNED." But if you hellban them, then they'll log in just fine, they'll post just fine... but no one will respond to their posts. Eventually they'll get bored because they can't get a rise out of anyone and they'll leave.

Similarly, some sites use "discouragement," where the site will run fine, but on their machine it'll behave slowly and sometimes fail completely (bad page loads, excessively long waits then nothing happens, etc).

Sometimes I wonder if PayPal is using this approach.

Re: A huge listserv. Each day, only one random person can write to it.

#80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I emailed them and they said they're fixing it. But for now, they manually added me - TheListserveProject@gmail.com.

thanks, ifthenecho. should be fixed now.

I just tried again, it's not fixed. Giving up.
Post reply on HN