Live data from Hacker News

YouTube may face criminal complaints in EU for using ad-block detection scripts

tomshardware.com

71–80 of 80 posts

Re: YouTube may face criminal complaints in EU for using ad-block detection scripts

#71
post #29

Why do you pretend that you are entitled to free video storage and bandwidth from YouTube? You haven't been sleighted. That service costs money to provide. No, you don't have a right to free service either. Do you pay your other bills while you demand free rendered services from these companies? Having a disability or similar does not entitle you to an unsubsidized Times Square with no ads. (NASA is running their own…

> Why do you pretend that you are entitled to free video storage and bandwidth from YouTube? Because they offered it for free. YouTube can close the doors any time. If they want my money, they can make a service offering that meets my needs. They could charge content providers for bandwidth and storage and meter it with assisted ad-support networks. They could charge a price I'm willing to pay. But they don't and I w…

> Because they offered it for free.

The Information Service Provider offered it for "free with ads".

Do you otherwise support paying creators for their work, if not through YouTube's system for compensating creators?

Re: YouTube may face criminal complaints in EU for using ad-block detection scripts

#72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You do not have the right to stream video for free from YouTube.com. That they offer an ad-supported service does not entitle us to an ad-free service. Limiting playback without ads is not beyond the rights of the information service provider.

I'm not contesting the legitimacy of YT fighting ad blockers. I'm merely pointing out that the claim here is that they are doing so using illegal means (by using what can be legally seen as spyware without the user's consent, which is illegal in the EU, according to the plaintiff). In other words, the issue is not that YT fights back, it's how they do it.

Maybe it's a lack of technical understanding.

Are you familiar with keggerator systems with usage quotas? ("Free as in beer")

How can a computerized keggerator system (or a bartender) limit a person to a specific number of drafts from the tap? Is that spyware, or what you agree to when you draw from their kegs?

Re: YouTube may face criminal complaints in EU for using ad-block detection scripts

#73

Why do you pretend that you are entitled to free video storage and bandwidth from YouTube? You haven't been sleighted. That service costs money to provide. No, you don't have a right to free service either. Do you pay your other bills while you demand free rendered services from these companies? Having a disability or similar does not entitle you to an unsubsidized Times Square with no ads. (NASA is running their own…

> Why do you pretend that you are entitled to free video storage and bandwidth from YouTube? You haven't been sleighted. That service costs money to provide. Because Google has been monopolistic in their strategy to become the no.1 video platform and crushed alternatives. This behaviour comes at a cost, pushing alternatives and now forcing adverts on everyone? I can't do much to stop their monopolistic behavior but I…

So you don't use ad blockers on ad-supported websites that are not monopolistic?

Re: YouTube may face criminal complaints in EU for using ad-block detection scripts

#74
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Why do you pretend that you are entitled to free video storage and bandwidth from YouTube? Because they offered it for free. YouTube can close the doors any time. If they want my money, they can make a service offering that meets my needs. They could charge content providers for bandwidth and storage and meter it with assisted ad-support networks. They could charge a price I'm willing to pay. But they don't and I w…

> Because they offered it for free. The Information Service Provider offered it for "free with ads ". Do you otherwise support paying creators for their work, if not through YouTube's system for compensating creators?

My Service Provider License Agreement states that I am able to circumvent any ad technology when using my own devices. It is free. The "with ads" part is someone else's opinion.

If you don't want ad-blockers, shut it down.

Re: YouTube may face criminal complaints in EU for using ad-block detection scripts

#75
post #39

Why do you pretend that you are entitled to free video storage and bandwidth from YouTube? You haven't been sleighted. That service costs money to provide. No, you don't have a right to free service either. Do you pay your other bills while you demand free rendered services from these companies? Having a disability or similar does not entitle you to an unsubsidized Times Square with no ads. (NASA is running their own…

This is a 1 dimensional view of things. Maybe I can simplify it for you with this question: Does Google have the ability to legally compel you to only use chrome? Im guessing you would say no- Antitrust and whatnot. So the next followup is, Does Google have the ability to tell blind people they cannot use screen readers? Or that people on linux cant browse the site in lynx? Again, I am guessing the answer is no- Ther…

> would not send the video stream to you until the advertisement was done playing

Is this really what consumers prefer?

Logged-in users necessarily carry state in some way such that they are identifiable as a logged-in user. "Session cookies" (and 'super cookies' etc) are standard practice for tracking which users are logged in.

YouTube does not and has not required login to view creators' videos and shorts.

And now don't they - just YouTube, hopefully - have to require login for their TOS to be a recognized agreement that authorizes determining whether the user is logged in and not stealing hours of free services.

Re: YouTube may face criminal complaints in EU for using ad-block detection scripts

#76
post #58
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Why do you pretend that you are entitled to free video storage and bandwidth from YouTube? Because they offered it for free. YouTube can close the doors any time. If they want my money, they can make a service offering that meets my needs. They could charge content providers for bandwidth and storage and meter it with assisted ad-support networks. They could charge a price I'm willing to pay. But they don't and I w…

>They could charge a price I'm willing to pay. So if the price of Premium was lower you'd be ok with this? Premium costs about the same as Netflix. Disclosure: I work at Google, but not on Youtube.

I watch primarily wildlife documentaries, educational lectures, and podcasts related to academic topics like paleontology, archaeology, ancient history, and other subjects. I don't want music, live shows, television, sports, or most content that would incur a premium markup.

If YouTube would be willing to charge me something in the neighborhood of $5-$10 per month for that I'd happily pay. I have never had a Netflix subscription. I stopped consuming pop content and movies in 2010.

I am serious about this. If you have any way of making recommendations to anyone anywhere within Alphabet that will listen, please offer it up. I would point you to a site like HistoryHit which is far more in-line with what I want. It is $60/year.

Also, I already pay $5/month to the Kevin Richardson foundation and the ad-blocking mechanism on YouTube prevents me from watching those videos (which I paid for).

Re: YouTube may face criminal complaints in EU for using ad-block detection scripts

#77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I really want to understand the psychology of the people who show up and comment like the OP did. Does he work for Google? For Youtube? More than a few people here on HN must, right? But there are so many like him, it can't be the explanation all the time. Does he worship big tech companies to the point that if he shills for them, he believes that career success will rain down on him, like some sort of occupational c…

> the psychology of Here's this: "I hate ads. My time is valuable. I want free things. What I do is justifiable. Especially when you consider moral relativism and their practices." And this: "I hate war, but the corporate media of the 2000s sold it to me and then didn't pay the bill; so we need citizen media." I don't think we're entitled to free video streaming; maybe because I remember how much it costs to host an…

I'm interested that music is your hook here and ensuring artists are paid for their work (which I also agree with), but you stated before that you also use ad blockers, so how do you support those non video/audio content producers whose written or other media you consume with ad blockers? (I assume you agree that content creation is also a worthwhile endeavour, otherwise you wouldn't be bothering to read the online content that requires you to use ad blocking.)

What is different to you between these scenarios?

Re: YouTube may face criminal complaints in EU for using ad-block detection scripts

#78
post #76
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>They could charge a price I'm willing to pay. So if the price of Premium was lower you'd be ok with this? Premium costs about the same as Netflix. Disclosure: I work at Google, but not on Youtube.

I watch primarily wildlife documentaries, educational lectures, and podcasts related to academic topics like paleontology, archaeology, ancient history, and other subjects. I don't want music, live shows, television, sports, or most content that would incur a premium markup. If YouTube would be willing to charge me something in the neighborhood of $5-$10 per month for that I'd happily pay. I have never had a Netflix…

It's $14/month or $11.67/month if you buy the annual plan. Or $23/month for a plan sharable by to up 6 total people who are in your household.

Re: YouTube may face criminal complaints in EU for using ad-block detection scripts

#79
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> the psychology of Here's this: "I hate ads. My time is valuable. I want free things. What I do is justifiable. Especially when you consider moral relativism and their practices." And this: "I hate war, but the corporate media of the 2000s sold it to me and then didn't pay the bill; so we need citizen media." I don't think we're entitled to free video streaming; maybe because I remember how much it costs to host an…

I'm interested that music is your hook here and ensuring artists are paid for their work (which I also agree with), but you stated before that you also use ad blockers, so how do you support those non video/audio content producers whose written or other media you consume with ad blockers? (I assume you agree that content creation is also a worthwhile endeavour, otherwise you wouldn't be bothering to read the online c…

I can otherwise support artists and their lifestyles or not by subscribing, buying their music, tickets to live shows, jam cruise, merch, and free word of mouth; free mentions

That they've agreed to sell their content on a network with ads (which in particular enables low income folks to be fans) does not entitle me to free shtyff from them; though I may also have a justified medical reason for tuning out ads entirely unless they're funny.

Re: YouTube may face criminal complaints in EU for using ad-block detection scripts

#80

Why do you pretend that you are entitled to free video storage and bandwidth from YouTube? You haven't been sleighted. That service costs money to provide. No, you don't have a right to free service either. Do you pay your other bills while you demand free rendered services from these companies? Having a disability or similar does not entitle you to an unsubsidized Times Square with no ads. (NASA is running their own…

Nobody claim to be entitled to free video, just a reasonable amount of advertising. Which is not what I (for example) get when I go on YouTube. Google already has a definitive solution: close down the free access under a registration+payment (reasonable one). Why they are still serving free content? Why they don't get the moneys from the viewers directly? I think that the reason is that they are inflating the number…

Why are you/they trying to force YouTube to require login to view video?!

Isn't this about privacy!? How can free video plays have privacy if login is required to prevent freeloading hours of free service that others pay for?

That would be a significant pivot away from free video that democratizes video, and from video URLs that people share to walled garden video URLs.

Post reply on HN