This control severely limits the utility of stolen iPhones, which is a good thing for me as an iPhone owner. There are other phones that consumers can choose that don’t have this pairing. But this pairing of parts is one of the reasons people choose and iPhone.
You Paid $1k for an iPhone, but Apple Still Controls It
21–30 of 235 posts
Re: You Paid $1k for an iPhone, but Apple Still Controls It
#22Anecdotal, but back in those "good old days" when you could get a screen replaced in 5 mins like this article said, on the three occasions I did this I ended up with the worst cheap Chinese knock off screens I have ever seen, the last time I ended up spending even more to get a genuine one. Hard to avoid this with small businesses when they need to make the enough of a margin at those cheaper retail prices. I'm sure…
Of course they don't use the same quality screens, because then the replacement would cost as much as it does in an apple store.
Re: You Paid $1k for an iPhone, but Apple Still Controls It
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is such an absurd excuse. The competing android devices are not exactly known for being a more popular target for theft. This is just a copout pushed by Apple to justify obviously bad practices, and due to their reality distortion field, you guys eat it up.
> The competing android devices are not exactly known for being a more popular target for theft. Do you have a source? And which exactly competing android devices do you mean? Does the comparison factor in the popularity of the device?
By competing devices of course I am referring to other flagships which are of a similar price and feature set, like flagship Samsung phones etc.
Re: You Paid $1k for an iPhone, but Apple Still Controls It
#24This control severely limits the utility of stolen iPhones, which is a good thing for me as an iPhone owner. There are other phones that consumers can choose that don’t have this pairing. But this pairing of parts is one of the reasons people choose and iPhone.
This is such an absurd excuse. The competing android devices are not exactly known for being a more popular target for theft. This is just a copout pushed by Apple to justify obviously bad practices, and due to their reality distortion field, you guys eat it up.
London sadly has an ongoing problem with phone snatchers and pickpockets, so on two occasions I’ve seen them nick an Android. In the first case, they just chucked it on the floor a few metres further down the road. On the second, the guy loudly shouted “what the fuck is this shit?” as he cycled down the road and threw it into a canal.
Re: You Paid $1k for an iPhone, but Apple Still Controls It
#25This control severely limits the utility of stolen iPhones, which is a good thing for me as an iPhone owner. There are other phones that consumers can choose that don’t have this pairing. But this pairing of parts is one of the reasons people choose and iPhone.
This is such an absurd excuse. The competing android devices are not exactly known for being a more popular target for theft. This is just a copout pushed by Apple to justify obviously bad practices, and due to their reality distortion field, you guys eat it up.
[1] https://archive.nytimes.com/bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/06/1...
Re: You Paid $1k for an iPhone, but Apple Still Controls It
#26This control severely limits the utility of stolen iPhones, which is a good thing for me as an iPhone owner. There are other phones that consumers can choose that don’t have this pairing. But this pairing of parts is one of the reasons people choose and iPhone.
apple do this to sell you phones instead of phone parts. if any of what you're saying was true it's simply a happy accident.
Re: You Paid $1k for an iPhone, but Apple Still Controls It
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why doesn't apple allow the owner to choose to decouple the pairing? It's telling why they dont.
Because thieves know that all iPhones are locked like this and thus don’t steal them. If they knew that some significant percentage were not locked they would be worth stealing again, and if it’s locked they just throw it in a dumpster. The fact that your phone is locked protects everyone else as well.
Re: You Paid $1k for an iPhone, but Apple Still Controls It
#28Re: You Paid $1k for an iPhone, but Apple Still Controls It
#29Re: You Paid $1k for an iPhone, but Apple Still Controls It
#30Anecdotal, but back in those "good old days" when you could get a screen replaced in 5 mins like this article said, on the three occasions I did this I ended up with the worst cheap Chinese knock off screens I have ever seen, the last time I ended up spending even more to get a genuine one. Hard to avoid this with small businesses when they need to make the enough of a margin at those cheaper retail prices. I'm sure…
At this point I'd be more wary of a non Chinese parts for many of the replacements.