A huge listserv. Each day, only one random person can write to it.
1–10 of 89 posts
Re: A huge listserv. Each day, only one random person can write to it.
#2Interesting gimmick if it's legit. (I mean gimmick in a positive way.)
Re: A huge listserv. Each day, only one random person can write to it.
#3A million people are signed up? How long do you have to wait on average to win a one in a million daily lottery.
Re: A huge listserv. Each day, only one random person can write to it.
#4A million people are signed up? How long do you have to wait on average to win a one in a million daily lottery.
Half a million days?
Re: A huge listserv. Each day, only one random person can write to it.
#5Tried to enter an email address with a '+' sign in it: "Email address is invalid".
No it's not.
Re: A huge listserv. Each day, only one random person can write to it.
#6http://play-fame.com is a similar premise for Twitter.
As recommendation algorithms and walled gardens fragment and homogenize our private online bubbles, perhaps these "anti-recommendation"/serendipity apps will help broaden people's horizons.
Re: A huge listserv. Each day, only one random person can write to it.
#7Tried to enter an email address with a '+' sign in it: "Email address is invalid". No it's not.
You're right, it's not, but maybe people are wising up to the username+spam_source@gmail.com trick.
Re: A huge listserv. Each day, only one random person can write to it.
#8Cool idea. A current count on the subscribers would be nice, so I could have an idea of how much progress has been made towards the initial goal of 10k.
Re: A huge listserv. Each day, only one random person can write to it.
#9Tried to enter an email address with a '+' sign in it: "Email address is invalid". No it's not.
I emailed them and they said they're fixing it. But for now, they manually added me - TheListserveProject@gmail.com.
Re: A huge listserv. Each day, only one random person can write to it.
#10Tried to enter an email address with a '+' sign in it: "Email address is invalid". No it's not.
You're right, it's not, but maybe people are wising up to the username+spam_source@gmail.com trick.
If that were the case they'd accept it and just remove the +spam_source before selling the address.