Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can go look at the old Predictit market if you like - it's still around[1]. You can also check election betting odds[2]. Clinton hovered around 60-80 in the week or two before the election. Even if it were 90%, I'm not sure that's an indictment of prediction markets. A probability of 90% means that 10% of the time, the other thing happens. It's a bit like saying "wow, it's cold today; I guess global warming isn't…
We have no way of exploring the multiverse or running the same election more than once, so there isn't any evidence that the payout from a prediction market matches the probability of something happening. It's just collecting the predictions of people who are willing to bet money, weighted by how much they spend, and calling that the prediction. I don't think rich people are necessarily better than not-so-rich people…
Prediction markets can tell the future. Why is the US so afraid of them?
21–30 of 60 posts
Re: Prediction markets can tell the future. Why is the US so afraid of them?
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
Match fixing happens regularly, so regularly that we have the term "match fixing" with a Wikipedia article dedicated to it. The presumption that match fixing doesn't happen in practice is unfounded. Here, from two months ago: "Over 180 professional tennis players participated in a global match-fixing ring" https://www.npr.org/2023/09/10/1198675541/over-180-professio...
OK, fair; a stronger argument is "it doesn't happen enough that we need to shut down horse racing". Or tennis betting, in your case.
Maybe if we were objective, horse betting should be shut down -- but we kinda don't care.
Re: Prediction markets can tell the future. Why is the US so afraid of them?
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
In theory the same thing is true with horse race betting; you can just assassinate the horse. Or the jockey. Or if you want to be more subtle about it, just slip something into the horse feed. But this doesn't really happen in practice.
A quick Google search shows a number of accusations of poisoning horses: https://www.espn.com/moresports/news/2003/0709/1578661.html https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/06/21/dressage-poisoni... Plus apparently a huge amount of drugs given to their own horses trying to cheat.
Re: Prediction markets can tell the future. Why is the US so afraid of them?
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
brexit was similar I remember several people IRL saying "well the market thinks it's a 90% chance of remain so I'm not worried"
Same response I gave the other guy - you can go look up the market here rather than conjecturing [1]. It was about 25% the day before. In any case, it seems very silly to discount prediction markets because the probability didn't work the way you expected it to in a single event. The whole point of probability is that it's probabilistic! [1]: https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/1413/Will-the-UK-vo...
prediction markets participants are idiots with no underlying knowledge betting according to their bias
they are no different to the "markets" created at the dog track
Re: Prediction markets can tell the future. Why is the US so afraid of them?
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
OK, fair; a stronger argument is "it doesn't happen enough that we need to shut down horse racing". Or tennis betting, in your case.
It's a question of scale. A few horses aren't a big deal, and both sides (the horse racing, and the bet) are heavily constrained in scope. Both sides become far less constrained with prediction markets. Maybe if we were objective, horse betting should be shut down -- but we kinda don't care.
Re: Prediction markets can tell the future. Why is the US so afraid of them?
#26One example is Polymarket:
Re: Prediction markets can tell the future. Why is the US so afraid of them?
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
Same response I gave the other guy - you can go look up the market here rather than conjecturing [1]. It was about 25% the day before. In any case, it seems very silly to discount prediction markets because the probability didn't work the way you expected it to in a single event. The whole point of probability is that it's probabilistic! [1]: https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/1413/Will-the-UK-vo...
> In any case, it seems very silly to discount prediction markets because the probability didn't work the way you expected it to in a single event. prediction markets participants are idiots with no underlying knowledge betting according to their bias they are no different to the "markets" created at the dog track
Re: Prediction markets can tell the future. Why is the US so afraid of them?
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
In theory the same thing is true with horse race betting; you can just assassinate the horse. Or the jockey. Or if you want to be more subtle about it, just slip something into the horse feed. But this doesn't really happen in practice.
A quick Google search shows a number of accusations of poisoning horses: https://www.espn.com/moresports/news/2003/0709/1578661.html https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/06/21/dressage-poisoni... Plus apparently a huge amount of drugs given to their own horses trying to cheat.
Re: Prediction markets can tell the future. Why is the US so afraid of them?
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can go look at the old Predictit market if you like - it's still around[1]. You can also check election betting odds[2]. Clinton hovered around 60-80 in the week or two before the election. Even if it were 90%, I'm not sure that's an indictment of prediction markets. A probability of 90% means that 10% of the time, the other thing happens. It's a bit like saying "wow, it's cold today; I guess global warming isn't…
#3 makes it look like things predicted as "very likely not" (10-20%) and "very likely so" (80-90%) tend to be biased towards the contrarian view. Does Metaculus have limits that make it unprofitable to make bets things that would push them outside the window? Anecdotally I've seen quotes from prediction marktets that show a surprisingly high chance for things that are incredibly improbable (to the point that I would…
Re: Prediction markets can tell the future. Why is the US so afraid of them?
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
> In any case, it seems very silly to discount prediction markets because the probability didn't work the way you expected it to in a single event. prediction markets participants are idiots with no underlying knowledge betting according to their bias they are no different to the "markets" created at the dog track
If that were true then the results of prediction markets wouldn't closely track the actual results that happen, as the link I provided shows that they do. Also, you could be making tons of money right now! How's that going?
as someone who has spent most of their career working on trading floors watching professional traders do their jobs
I'm perfectly happy staying the hell away from prediction "markets", thank you very much