So, like every other webmail then?
Some run locally in the browser.
Many don’t send the credentials to be saved cloud-side.
51–60 of 119 posts
So, like every other webmail then?
Some run locally in the browser.
Many don’t send the credentials to be saved cloud-side.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, you often can do that. Gmail supports adding IMAP accounts, for example. iOS mail app allows it and all that data is synced to iCloud for most people. We just trust Apple isn't snooping.
Does the iOS mail app do that? Every time I get a new Apple device I have to set fastmail back up from scratch with a new app password, even if I restore the device from a backup of an older device.
So, like every other webmail then?
I do think this is a big deal, certainly my expectation was that the New Outlook work alot like the old Mail app.
The free new Outlook replaces Mail in Windows, and later also the classic Outlook. It sends secret credentials to Microsoft servers.
> Although TLS-protected, the data is sent to Microsoft in plain text within the tunnel. Although encrypted, the data is unencrypted when you decrypt it! They should at least add double ROT-13... Did whoever wrote this realize you need to be able to recover the cleartext for this to even work?
It is conceivable that they wanted to express "although encrypted in transit, it is not hashed and Microsoft can recover the full password". However, you'd have to be very charitable to interpret the articale like that. This is not a translation error either. The same mistake can be found in the German original. > Did whoever write this realize you need to be able to recover the cleartext for this to even work? The f…
I only have a local user on Windows 11, but have started wondering when MS will create a shadow profile for me and upload all the data. So kind of them.
-Microsoft probably.
New Outlook on Mac is terrible - it lacks basic critical functionality such as tabular view (1 line per message) with column sorting by: From, To, Date received, Subject etc. Fortunately old Outlook is still available - I have to switch back after every update.
“Let’s get it working and add in future releases” makes sense for new products but is so dumb when it’s reworking existing products to make the crappier.
Microsoft does this all the time. They also do stuff like decide that Teams won’t have wikis any more. Because, like, nobody wants wikis in their collab suite.
New Outlook on Mac is terrible - it lacks basic critical functionality such as tabular view (1 line per message) with column sorting by: From, To, Date received, Subject etc. Fortunately old Outlook is still available - I have to switch back after every update.
Outlook is terrible, period. I've been running the O365 Outlook version at my company and they broke simple things. I want to search for an email, so I select the folder, then click search and start typing. In the new Outlook, the moment I press the first key for my search query, the focus moves off of the search bar, for no reason whatsoever, so every. single. fucking. goddamn. time. I want to search, I select the f…
For that reason, I end up keeping my corporate mail in TWO clients: True desktop Outlook in a Win VM, and also in my Mac's Mail.app. 99% of my mail I handle on the Mac side (for one thing, search is WAY WAY WAY BETTER). But scheduling? True Outlook every time. It's just better.
I haven't seen or used the "new Outlook," but it sounds like another example of MSFT calling multiple products by the same name to muddy distinctions for marketing reasons (e.g., "SQL Sever" and "Azure SQL"). "New Outlook" definitely doesn't sound like something I could or would ever use.