Live data from Hacker News

Apple has a memory problem and we're all paying for it

macworld.com

81–90 of 409 posts

Re: Apple has a memory problem and we're all paying for it

#81

I don't understand... I routinely run my M1 Air with 4 instances of jetbrains IDEs, have dual screen, Safari with tens of tabs, additional apps like Rocket chat and more... and the machine never go past 8gb ram. What's going on with others ?

Tens? try hundreds of tabs, across three browsers.

also Docker.

Re: Apple has a memory problem and we're all paying for it

#82
post #21

Counter to title, as a non-mac-user I probably benefit from entry-level Macs having 8GB vs 16GB RAM - it increases pressure on devs to actually try to reign in their ballooning web/Electron apps when resource waste becomes noticable on modern hardware. Accounting for second-order effects over longer timeframes it could be a net benefit for desktop users. 8GB should be plenty. That it isn't is a software problem.

Unfortunately if you use typescript (tsc) it absolutely gobbles memory up

So your use-case may require more and the entry-level model may not be an appropriate choice for you. I can also come up with dozens of not-too-uncommon scenarios where 16GB won't suffice, either (4k video editing + commonly mandated corpware, for one).

Re: Apple has a memory problem and we're all paying for it

#83
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Eh, if you give more Ram developers will just take advantage of it. Realistically perf headroom just gets eaten up on shitty code and abstraction layers. Ever notice how word is always the same slow-ish speeds. Never really faster.

You’re arguing that we should all be using 10-20 year old computers and that computers should never get faster because it makes us write less efficient code? That’s an asinine argument.

Not only that, it doesn't even work if only Apple does it. Developers will still write the bloated code because it runs on cheap PCs with 16+GB of RAM, and it runs on the pricier Macs that also have 16+GB of RAM, so the only thing it runs poorly on is the more affordable Macs which are a small enough market segment for developers to disregard.

Re: Apple has a memory problem and we're all paying for it

#84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No it's not. A ton of programs used by regular people (Chrome etc.) are RAM hogs, if you are a dev, then Docker is also an egregious example. If you happen to play games (a big thing for average people), that 8GB will be shared between the CPU and the GPU. Even the Steam Deck, admittedly a budget device, comes with 16GB. It's often mentioned that macOS is more frugal with RAM, a claim which I flat out found to be unt…

> No it's not. A ton of programs used by regular people (Chrome etc.) are RAM hogs, if you are a dev, then Docker is also an egregious example. If you happen to play games (a big thing for average people), that 8GB will be shared between the CPU and the GPU. Even the Steam Deck, admittedly a budget device, comes with 16GB. That's why I said normal office workers and students. I never said 8GB is enough for devs. It w…

> That's why I said normal office workers and students.

Costing 9 hundos a piece, Air is not something a regular company would buy for their employees.

They're more likely to buy a budget laptop in the 400-500 range which you can bet will do just fine for office work, and you can always upgrade it if necessary.

If a company really does need their employees to work a Mac, they will have to cough out a lot more for the 16GB version, and this is what the article calls corporate greed.

Re: Apple has a memory problem and we're all paying for it

#85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>That’s an asinine argument. Good that that isn't the actual argument made by GP, but just a pretty strawman you managed to think up.

I'm also unable to read the argument in any other way. If you have a better explanation please provide it.

The jump from developers will use more RAM on abstraction layers to computers shouldnt get faster was never made by the original comment, and implying it was made is the worst possible reading of the argument made which is against HN guidelines.

Re: Apple has a memory problem and we're all paying for it

#86
post #31

Luxury status items are not priced on BOM. That's the whole point, showing that you don't care paying way beyond actual costs. It would be a strategic signaling mistake for Apple to sell RAM upgrades at actual cost, it would decrease their luxury brand value. If you don't mind signaling poor and want to pay just actual costs buy a PC.

This would only make sense if there was some way for people to show off their extra RAM. A MacBook Pro with 8GB or RAM, or 24GB for $400 more, look exactly the same, and no one cares how much RAM someone else has. It's not a flex.

Re: Apple has a memory problem and we're all paying for it

#87
post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> No it's not. A ton of programs used by regular people (Chrome etc.) are RAM hogs, if you are a dev, then Docker is also an egregious example. If you happen to play games (a big thing for average people), that 8GB will be shared between the CPU and the GPU. Even the Steam Deck, admittedly a budget device, comes with 16GB. That's why I said normal office workers and students. I never said 8GB is enough for devs. It w…

> That's why I said normal office workers and students. Costing 9 hundos a piece, Air is not something a regular company would buy for their employees. They're more likely to buy a budget laptop in the 400-500 range which you can bet will do just fine for office work, and you can always upgrade it if necessary. If a company really does need their employees to work a Mac, they will have to cough out a lot more for the…

When I was in college, I interned as IT support at a large corporation. We were buying $1200 Lenovos for normal office workers and $2000 laptop workstations for the design engineers. You'd be surprised at how much money enterprises spend on each laptop.

I happen to think that the enterprise is an untapped market for Macs. Not tech offices. Other industries that run on Lenovos and Dells.

If I'm a small business, I still wouldn't buy $500 Windows laptops for my employees. I'd buy $750 M1 Airs. They last longer, "just work", and have fewer support issues.

Re: Apple has a memory problem and we're all paying for it

#89
post #65
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Where do you live? I pay half that to take my family of 5 out.

Legal Sea Foods: one soup, one main, one drink. Tax, tip, then parking. $100 per person.

Hopefully you don't live at Legal Sea Foods, which is a popular New England restaurant, so maybe you're in Boston where it's that expensive?

Re: Apple has a memory problem and we're all paying for it

#90
post #31

Luxury status items are not priced on BOM. That's the whole point, showing that you don't care paying way beyond actual costs. It would be a strategic signaling mistake for Apple to sell RAM upgrades at actual cost, it would decrease their luxury brand value. If you don't mind signaling poor and want to pay just actual costs buy a PC.

Premium pricing absolutely factors in. They charge $200 instead of say $199.99 because it’s meant to feel expensive, not like a good deal.
Post reply on HN