Live data from Hacker News

Omegle 2009-2023

omegle.com

811–820 of 1001 posts

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#811

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Really? We want to protect the rights of pedophiles? Where could this argument be going.

Slippery slope fallacy. How many people are pedophiles? How many people who aren't will need to give up their rights so that that minority... actually just keeps on doing what they do, because there's always alternatives?

We should forbidden streets. Full of pedophiles!

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#812
post #658

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For people who are looking for this -- It's a common refrain on Twitter that Twitter can be a better dating app than actual dating apps. I think the mechanism here is similar -- both Twitter and Omegle encourage a sort of stream-of-consciousness, semi-anonymous communication style that facilitates soul entwinement.

I met my wife because she saw on facebook a screenshot someone has taken from a tweet I did about a terrorist attack. (Charlie Hebdo 2015- Paris). This encouraged her to read my blog then to get in touch, etc… So meeting my wife happened because: 1. There was a terrorist attack 2. I tweeted about it 3. The tweet became popular 4. A random someone took the time to screenshot it to share it on Facebook 5. That random s…

Same as the odds of every other child that was ever conceived. It's really easy to look backwards in time, think of every single "if this never happened..." moment, and conclude that the probability is near zero. And you would be right.

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#813

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A large portion of commentators here greatly dislike the idea of unmonitored interactions between humans. Their ideal is that every person's cellphone continuously records nearby conversations and sends them to the police where they can run large language models to provide a shortlist of dangerous communications that a policeman can then look at and charge for.

We all know this is not true, not even close. Read through the comments here, there's a clear overwhelming majority opinion blaming the family rather than the company. Even beyond this post, I've never seen this called for on this site. You are in a clear majority position but still pretend to be persecuted and victimized by an imagined boogeyman.

This thread is about what exactly?

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#814
post #396

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or this: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5poLSRa3cpHBfiJ6wQdT... Frank Tedesco, pianist / musician meets people on Omegle, takes song requests and plays them - and for ones he doesn't know, he listens once on his phone then plays them by ear.

Also see these musicians with many "play for strangers on Omegle" videos: Marcus Veltri, piano, https://www.youtube.com/@MarcusVeltri Rob Landis, violin, https://www.youtube.com/@RobLandes Billy Wilkins, guitar and vocals, https://www.youtube.com/@BillyWilkins The Doo, guitar and piana and otamatone, https://www.youtube.com/@TheDooo Both Frank Tedesco and Marcus Veltri frequently did joint Omegle videos with Rob Land…

Harry Mack has done a few collaborations with Marcus Veltri and Rob Landis:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cXKJ3uv_XIk

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#815

Omegle was a horrible place that was not moderated enough and enabled groomers. It was also a place that felt very "old school internet" due to the "wild west style".

> It was also a place that felt very "old school internet" due to the "wild west style". And what's wrong with that. The current internet feels like a playground where we are forced to fall in order to the wall garden owner. When you use the internet you should have the sense that the domain your going to access requires yourself to need to apply self caution. Letting a 11 year old online without supervision is just…

A playground where every surface is foam-lined, and the whole place is relentlessly patrolled by fascists in mickey-mouse costumes.

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#816

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> It seems the real reason this lawsuit found traction while similar ones against much larger platforms is precisely because Omegle sounds like a fairly shoestring operation. Platforms with an army of lawyers can surely fend lawsuits like this off without batting an eye. Platforms with an army of lawyers would never greenlight Omegle's basic behavior, to start with.

What "basic behavior" is that? Anonymously video chatting strangers on the internet? Can't you already do that in many Discord servers? Or on dozens of other apps and websites (e.g. Chatroulette)? There clearly isn't anything fundamentally illegal about the practice, or these would all be shut down.

> Or on dozens of other apps and websites (e.g. Chatroulette)?

Chatroulette, the one most similar to Omegle, like Omegle, was started by a teenager alone (at about the same time), with the additional advantage (from the point of vulnerability to civil liability) of being in Russia.

But even so, they very early on faced the same kind of criticism as Omegle, shifted to registration-required and adults-only very early on, had an easier way to report inappropriate content, automatic temporary bans for too many reports too close together, and adopted other mitigations beyond what Omegle has.

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#817
post #660

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That seems nuts to me. It's just a generic venue for people meeting people, like a cafe that happens to be online. To me that makes as much sense as suing a cafe because you met somebody there who talked you into illegal activities.

No cafe would allow an adult to sexually groom a child while sitting at a table.

Yes, 90% of cafes would, because just like Omegle, it's not their job or ability to monitor every single interaction between every single person and identify whether a conversation is appropriate.

Crimes happen on all technologies and in all venues, and they likely always will.

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#818
post #401

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How much was there to find on the internet in the 90s? I arrived ca. 2001 and found enough high-quality content (folk songs, math puzzles, some books already digitized) to feel like I had discovered a giant library. And it kept growing: Wikipedia arrived, various forums and magazines appeared (most were crap, of course, but there was no shortage of good ones). As far as I can tell, things started getting worse around…

> What had I missed from the 90s that didn't make it into the 00s? IRC was a big one. Back when you hopped on a server, typed in #cityname, and joined a lively realtime conversation with folks in your area. That was cool. I’m too young for usenet, but I’ve been hearing about how cool and amazing it was for like 25 years now. Apparently the web never quite managed to capture that magic.

Ah, IRC. Yeah, I came too late to make new friends there (though it was still good for keeping in contact with old ones). Still managed to enjoy the usenet, although the "big" groups were already full of spam.

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#820

This is devastating. I have so many fond memories of meeting fellow weirdos over text. The days where StumbleUpon always took you somewhere exciting, cool, beautiful, interesting, funny, or novel. Where you looked at what people did with The Web 2.0 and only marveled at the possibilities of what could come. Truly feels like the death of one of the old guard, a Usenet-of-the-2010s. I even used it during pandemic times…

I didn’t use Omegle much, but I actually met my now wife on there. We used the text only thing where a third person suggests a topic. Must’ve talked for a good 2 hours on there before exchanging informations, I shudder thinking that even the smallest glitch could have changed my life so drastically. We met 11 years ago on the platform, a completely random fluke. And while I haven’t really used Omegle in a long time,…

Are you English, and your wife American, by any chance?
Post reply on HN