Live data from Hacker News

Brits make Amazon, Meta stop using third-party data to undercut rivals

theregister.com

51–59 of 59 posts

Re: Brits make Amazon, Meta stop using third-party data to undercut rivals

#51
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It strikes me as very similar to the ever present conflict of interest in the securities world between clients and broker-dealers. A business like Amazon’s retail one is quite like the latter, and I would be totally unsurprised to see more and more legislative pressure applied to force them to segregate if not choose between their ‘agency’ and ‘prop’-type franchises; especially outside the US. Stuff like the EU’s DMA…

We let supermarkets competitively position themselves all the time. Why is Amazon different?

Most supermarkets do not rent out a significant proportion of their floorspace to third party retails which they directly compete with? (and therefore have an arguably unfair advantage because they have full access to their sales data but not the other way around)

Re: Brits make Amazon, Meta stop using third-party data to undercut rivals

#53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They certainly have stopped people doing it at prices cheaper than they sell through Amazon. They're running a protection racket.

Don't sell on Amazon if you want to sell at a lower price, it's not that hard.

It's not hard at all. We can say the same about someone coming round to smash up your business if you don't give them money. Just give them money, it's not that hard.

Just because something is easy doesn't make it okay.

Re: Brits make Amazon, Meta stop using third-party data to undercut rivals

#54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why can’t they just let adults buy and sell the way they want to? Would be nice but Amazon are quite keen on not letting that happen.

How’s that? Amazon is lobbying for legislation to prevent you from purchasing from someone?

They don't need to. They have such a big chunk of the market that if you don't sell how THEY want you to, you lose access to a huge chunk of the market. That's the problem. That's the complaint. That sellers who want to sell to buyers who want to buy are forced to do it how Amazon states, for the benefit of Amazon, which means the seller has to put their prices up to cover Amazon's Danegeld, but then may NOT also sell elsewhere at the lower, non-Danegeld price.

Re: Brits make Amazon, Meta stop using third-party data to undercut rivals

#55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why can’t they just let adults buy and sell the way they want to? Would be nice but Amazon are quite keen on not letting that happen.

Amazon has never stopped anyone from putting up a website and shipping things to customers.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2020/07/emails-detail-am...

Re: Brits make Amazon, Meta stop using third-party data to undercut rivals

#56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Don't sell on Amazon if you want to sell at a lower price, it's not that hard.

It's not hard at all. We can say the same about someone coming round to smash up your business if you don't give them money. Just give them money, it's not that hard. Just because something is easy doesn't make it okay.

Nonsense to equivocate someone not doing anything to you to someone damaging your property.

Re: Brits make Amazon, Meta stop using third-party data to undercut rivals

#57
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Amazon has never stopped anyone from putting up a website and shipping things to customers.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2020/07/emails-detail-am...

Good example, dumping in this manner should be illegal if all the allegations are true.

Re: Brits make Amazon, Meta stop using third-party data to undercut rivals

#58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yup. A complete ban on in-house brands for anyone operating a marketplace.

Including grocery stores?

Grocery stores used to be marketplaces. Then in-house brands came along. The current iteration of grocery stores is Aldi, where everything they sell is an in-house brand.

Re: Brits make Amazon, Meta stop using third-party data to undercut rivals

#59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not hard at all. We can say the same about someone coming round to smash up your business if you don't give them money. Just give them money, it's not that hard. Just because something is easy doesn't make it okay.

Nonsense to equivocate someone not doing anything to you to someone damaging your property.

Come up with whatever bullshit you like to fanboy Amazon as much as you need to. The facts don't care.
Post reply on HN