Live data from Hacker News

999 Request Denied

http.dev

71–74 of 74 posts

Re: 999 Request Denied

#71

This is super unprofessional. 999 means nothing, therefore it cannot be acted upon, therefore it is totally useless. Best description which I can come up with is "I don't like you and I won't say why, because I don't like you". The expected client behavior is sending in return an empty http post request with wtf header and value "I feel this server is passive aggressive towards me."

> therefore it cannot be acted upon, therefore it is totally useless From the examples, this seem to be the point. If you receive a 429, you know you can just backoff a bit and it'll work at a later point, but if you receive 999, you're not sure how to proceed, which seems to be what they (the service) wants.

Then they should return a 400.

Re: 999 Request Denied

#72
post #2

I’ve always used 418 for this kind of thing

I always use 418 for anti-botting responses. First because it's hilarious and second because I want them to know that I know what they did heh.

Re: 999 Request Denied

#73
post #70
post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which isn't remotely the same thing as whether it's a 'thing'.

Technically correct. But one could argue that it shouldn't be a thing.

Then argue that. I can't even begin to catalog the things that shouldn't be, that are, even tho they aren't 'the standard'.

Re: 999 Request Denied

#74
post #73
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Technically correct. But one could argue that it shouldn't be a thing.

Then argue that. I can't even begin to catalog the things that shouldn't be, that are, even tho they aren't 'the standard'.

I don’t want to since I don’t think it should be a thing. If you want a catch-all error code, use 500 and accept the shame that comes with it.
Post reply on HN