Earlier quoted context omitted.
If only there was a decentralized system to allow version management of code.
I realize you're talking about git, but I think it's also pretty important to have a place where users can submit issues and dev's can say "it's fixed in version XYZ", these are not features of git. I've been meaning to give radicle a try.
We are investigating reports of degraded performance
41–50 of 152 posts
Re: We are investigating reports of degraded performance
#42My repos were coming up as 404s. I was wondering if I had been canned...
Re: We are investigating reports of degraded performance
#43I need a macro template for those memes with Bart Simpson on the blackboard and make it say "I will always have a backup plan for third-party services". Seriously people: gitea exists. Gitlab self-hosted exists. Drone/Woodpecker CI exists. It's not that difficult to set up a project that does not depend on Github. I spent less time setting these up than the amount of down time that Github has had this year.
Re: We are investigating reports of degraded performance
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
If only there was a decentralized system to allow version management of code.
I realize you're talking about git, but I think it's also pretty important to have a place where users can submit issues and dev's can say "it's fixed in version XYZ", these are not features of git. I've been meaning to give radicle a try.
Re: We are investigating reports of degraded performance
#45I like how "Every request returns a 404" == "degraded performance"
It should load faster if there's nothing to load
The current abomination I'm working on avoids this by caching the errors and serving them for several hours...
Re: We are investigating reports of degraded performance
#46I cannot wait for Gitea, Forgejo, and GitLab to start federating with each other via ActivityPub. Then we can all take one more step away from a corporate-controlled internet.
Even my open source projects in github are just mirrors from the "real place" of work: gitlab or my own gitea instance. If github is down, it is a minor inconvenience but I can still work.
Re: We are investigating reports of degraded performance
#47I cannot wait for Gitea, Forgejo, and GitLab to start federating with each other via ActivityPub. Then we can all take one more step away from a corporate-controlled internet.
Re: We are investigating reports of degraded performance
#48I cannot wait for Gitea, Forgejo, and GitLab to start federating with each other via ActivityPub. Then we can all take one more step away from a corporate-controlled internet.
Downvote me to grey-world if you like, but I think everyone's crazy to put all their code infrastructure in the hands of fucking Microsoft. Especially literal free open-source software. Who do you think Microsoft is? What do you know of Microsoft's history and their core values (they're "embrace, extinguish & exsanguinate"). It's like giving fucking Sauron safekeeping of your power-rings in Mordor, oh we have great infrastructure for safe ring storage here, very secure, the orcs are really expert guards.
Re: We are investigating reports of degraded performance
#49Github is becoming too important. A routine backup system is needed, something like archive.org, that backs up important Github projects.
Re: We are investigating reports of degraded performance
#50PR really spun gold when they decided to label everything from every single one of their databases getting deleted and backups nuked to intermittent connectivity issues as "degraded". Who exactly are they making feel better by not calling a spade a spade?
People will take issue with any wording. Why try to find the exact right words each time when people will have exactly the same complaints?