Live data from Hacker News

Mozilla treats Debian devotees to the raw taste of Firefox Nightly

theregister.com

61–70 of 105 posts

Re: Mozilla treats Debian devotees to the raw taste of Firefox Nightly

#61
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Debian regularly dispatches security patches in the form of updates for firefox/chromium. It's the same as running "apt upgrade"

Debian ships Firefox ESR, not Firefox stable. As a web developer I cannot work on just ESR.

Why not? I'm writing on ESR as I type this. The most current version of ESR is based on FF 115. The general release is 119. At this late date in web history, you shouldn't be dependent on some niche feature or implementation that only exists between 115 and 119.

Re: Mozilla treats Debian devotees to the raw taste of Firefox Nightly

#62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Debian ships Firefox ESR, not Firefox stable. As a web developer I cannot work on just ESR.

Why not? I'm writing on ESR as I type this. The most current version of ESR is based on FF 115. The general release is 119. At this late date in web history, you shouldn't be dependent on some niche feature or implementation that only exists between 115 and 119.

Dev tooling moves pretty quick. I find a nice to have feature every other version release that makes life better. ESR's significant lag misses out on a lot of these.

Re: Mozilla treats Debian devotees to the raw taste of Firefox Nightly

#63
post #23

I was running debian stable for the last few years (until a few days ago, due to a brand new laptop ...) and was perfectly happy with the Firefox linux build tarballs: 1. untar as root into /opt 2. symlink /opt/firefox/firefox to /usr/local/bin/firefox 3. compose a 13-line firefox.desktop and put in ~/.local/share/applications/ Only the first step needs to be repeated when there is a new release.

> compose a 13-line firefox.desktop and put in ~/.local/share/applications/ And that’s where the problem lies. Apt has great documentation, creating .desktop files and their syntax? Not so much

You have an entire computers worth of example .desktop files. Copy one and change the relevant fields.

Re: Mozilla treats Debian devotees to the raw taste of Firefox Nightly

#64
post #23

I was running debian stable for the last few years (until a few days ago, due to a brand new laptop ...) and was perfectly happy with the Firefox linux build tarballs: 1. untar as root into /opt 2. symlink /opt/firefox/firefox to /usr/local/bin/firefox 3. compose a 13-line firefox.desktop and put in ~/.local/share/applications/ Only the first step needs to be repeated when there is a new release.

> compose a 13-line firefox.desktop and put in ~/.local/share/applications/ And that’s where the problem lies. Apt has great documentation, creating .desktop files and their syntax? Not so much

> creating .desktop files and their syntax? Not so much

This took me less than 2 seconds to find.

https://specifications.freedesktop.org/desktop-entry-spec/de...

Re: Mozilla treats Debian devotees to the raw taste of Firefox Nightly

#65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why not? I'm writing on ESR as I type this. The most current version of ESR is based on FF 115. The general release is 119. At this late date in web history, you shouldn't be dependent on some niche feature or implementation that only exists between 115 and 119.

Dev tooling moves pretty quick. I find a nice to have feature every other version release that makes life better. ESR's significant lag misses out on a lot of these.

And feature and standards support, when I was writing a web app using HTML5 video Firefox would freeze on Android. This was years ago. Thankfully do not have to worry about ESR for Android.

Re: Mozilla treats Debian devotees to the raw taste of Firefox Nightly

#67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Beware that on Ubuntu the apt version is actually only a shim to the snap install. (Edit: at least on latest LTS and above and default repositories)

I think OP meant switching to the Mozilla APT when they offer stable alongside nightly. Not switching to the snap-ed Ubuntu version.

They do offer the beta channel[1], if that's not too edgy.

1: https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/firefox-n...

Re: Mozilla treats Debian devotees to the raw taste of Firefox Nightly

#68

Tangentially related, Firefox-from-snap completely broke for me recently in a way that I couldn't be bothered to diagnose ("error: cannot communicate with server: Post http://localhost/v2/snaps/firefox : dial unix /run/snapd.socket: connect: no such file or directory"). It prompted me to finally wipe Snap fully from my system and install Firefox from the Mozilla PPA. The only other Snap app I currently use is Intelli…

Another fun issue with the snap version: due to filesystem sandboxing, it can't open file:///... URLs.

Re: Mozilla treats Debian devotees to the raw taste of Firefox Nightly

#69
post #23

I was running debian stable for the last few years (until a few days ago, due to a brand new laptop ...) and was perfectly happy with the Firefox linux build tarballs: 1. untar as root into /opt 2. symlink /opt/firefox/firefox to /usr/local/bin/firefox 3. compose a 13-line firefox.desktop and put in ~/.local/share/applications/ Only the first step needs to be repeated when there is a new release.

I'm on Ubuntu so I'm also using the tarballs. I wouldn't want to have to update it manually every time, though. Instead, I've extracted Firefox into ~/.local/opt/firefox and the auto-updater works as expected. I'll definitely switch to the apt distribution down the line, though. Package management is one of the main reasons why I use Linux in the first place.

Why switch? You're currently already using Firefox's own auto-updater. Since you've already done the manual set up, Debian's package manager would add nothing AFAICT.

Re: Mozilla treats Debian devotees to the raw taste of Firefox Nightly

#70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm on Ubuntu so I'm also using the tarballs. I wouldn't want to have to update it manually every time, though. Instead, I've extracted Firefox into ~/.local/opt/firefox and the auto-updater works as expected. I'll definitely switch to the apt distribution down the line, though. Package management is one of the main reasons why I use Linux in the first place.

Beware that on Ubuntu the apt version is actually only a shim to the snap install. (Edit: at least on latest LTS and above and default repositories)

Yeah, the switch was super apparent to me because the snap version is painfully slow to open and sluggish in general. Switching back to binaries was night and day.
Post reply on HN