Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wasn't DC v Heller ghost written by the same group as Dobbs? (not literally but guided in a similar fashion) Of course it is similar it was a test bed to pull this. At least DC v Heller could point to actual facts to back up it's interpretation. Dobbs just dances around the idea saying "we believe" a lot and super focusing on the Supremacy clause in a way not seen in... I couldn't even say how long ago it was that th…
> Wasn't DC v Heller ghost written by the same group as Dobbs? (not literally but guided in a similar fashion) What, the Federalist Society? In as far as the last three justices willing to overturn Roe were hand-selected by them, yes, but there was little doubt that any of them would vote to overturn Roe even before their confirmations. > At least DC v Heller could point to actual facts to back up it's interpretation…
I am not saying he is partisan but it is hard to say he is neutral when Originalism has been used as a hammer to eliminate Liberal ideas like "maybe we shouldn't regulate modern guns used to kill dozens like muskets" or "what right does the state have over what health care a woman chooses with regards to the most dangerous thing she will do in her life".