Live data from Hacker News

.io considered harmful

beep.blog

191–200 of 254 posts

Re: .io considered harmful

#191
post #130

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, but it wasn't like there were pre-existing inhabitants in the Americas at that time. /HEAVIEST-S-POSSIBLE

Is that suppose to be some sort of sarcasm I'm missing, or you just ignore Indigenous people? [1] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_peoples_of_the_Amer...

Not sure if the comment was edited or not, but "/s" is often used as a shorthand for indicating sarcasm due to it not being easy to infer tone in text, so "/HEAVIEST-S-POSSIBLE" is intended mean that you should read their comment in as sarcastic a tone as possible. So yes, they were being sarcastic.

Re: .io considered harmful

#192
post #130

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, but it wasn't like there were pre-existing inhabitants in the Americas at that time. /HEAVIEST-S-POSSIBLE

Is that suppose to be some sort of sarcasm I'm missing, or you just ignore Indigenous people? [1] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_peoples_of_the_Amer...

The “/HEAVIEST-S-POSSIBLE” is an extension of “/s” which is used as an explicit indicator of sarcasm.

Re: .io considered harmful

#193
post #138

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was hoping we could keep our zealousness to tabs vs spaces, 2 vs 3 vs 4 vs 8 indentation levels, etc.

Do you end all your statements in JS with semicolons? What, are you some sort of semicolonialist?

Does this make Erlang a colonialist?

Re: .io considered harmful

#194

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In agree in the abstract. In practice, we are very over-indexed on these deconstruction type issues by selectively reopening old wounds, often along racial lines, which isn't leading anywhere good, defiantly not to mars.

Many of these wounds have never closed for the people affected by them.

[dead]

Re: .io considered harmful

#195
post #177
post #173

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Here’s the ultimate authority on why computer languages should count from zero: https://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/ewd08xx/EWD831.PDF >

There are linguistic arguments that suggest 1-basing. [1] [1] http://kilby.stanford.edu/~rvg/ordinal.html

this is unfortunately not an entirely good argument…

> Then the colleague continues by numbering the next apple "126", and the process ends at "188". At that point the colleague has to guess whether the counting started at 0 or at 1, i.e. whether the total number of apples is 188 or 189.

false. the next person, having heard 188, only needs to know what follows. 189. as this is a job that has been divided, so long as the beginning stage is recorded somewhere, as well as the end stage, each worker (save first and last) exclusively need to know the number of the apple prior to their first for their first apple is not zero or one, it is the number immediately following last. n+1.

counting could have started at -1.

heathen.

Re: .io considered harmful

#196

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The invocation of "colonialism" in tech discussions tends to be a pretty reliable indication that what follows will be gibberish.

I'm just happy they are talking about it all! It's good to learn about things outside your main domain, especially with something like world history/geopolitics. Can you give examples of the gibberish? Genuinely fascinated to know what you are referring to. This kind of stuff in particular can be pretty disheartening to learn about in general, and I find misinformation/pathos around it can often come from resistance…

Hi there! I'm glad you're genuinely fascinated! Deciphering the meaning of words used by commoners can be totes challenging!

I too enjoy learning things outside my main areas of interest, sometimes even conversing with people who exist outside the monoculture of my university program. I find there's a lot of misinformation/pathos around these beautiful people and their diverse cultures.

Instead of using every word literally, they rely on a series of adaptive techniques (or "linguistic crutches", as I like to call them). They're just like the similes or metaphors we all learned about in English Composition I and II, but theirs don't always capture the depth, breadth, and/or nuance of a topic like ours do. Sometimes they speak in generalities or fail to support their comments with peer-reviewed meta-analyses. Nevertheless, they still seem to understand each other! It's truly very fascinating!

Despite not knowing how words work or what Science is, it's a longstanding cultural practice of theirs to make unlicensed casual, general observations about their lived experience and the world they live in. They're known to do it in bars, in line at the gas station, in newspapers, comment sections on the internet, and even over the telephone!

Sometimes, PhD students mistake these for formal theses and miss the point entirely. Other times, people who think they look smart ask them patronizing, bad-faith questions.

In this case, the user is likely not saying that the text fails to encode meaningful information or is especially difficult to understand. Instead, this is a commonly-employed polite term for "banal bullshit".

Put another way, they're likely expressing their opinion that this class of content is frequently superficial, lacks criticality, contributes minimally to the advancement of knowledge, and offers limited utility or actionable insight for broader discourse or practical application, as if the authors just wanted an excuse to use a new word or phrase they've just learned, whether to drive revenue, to prove to their peers that they're a Good Person, or some secret third thing.

Re: .io considered harmful

#197
post #169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They could take the dispute to the UN internet court for domain names, whatever it's called. I can't see why that would apply only to the TLDs that existed 20 years ago.

You’re thinking of WIPO, perhaps? IIUC, they can’t interfere in the affairs of a ccTLD registry unless invited to do so. So if the Colombian authorities says you lose your domain to some local Colombian outfit, then you lose.

I was thinking of WIPO, and that's interesting that they have to be invited. I guess someone could always establish a cheap LLC there if they really wanted protection.

Re: .io considered harmful

#198
post #191

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is that suppose to be some sort of sarcasm I'm missing, or you just ignore Indigenous people? [1] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_peoples_of_the_Amer...

Not sure if the comment was edited or not, but "/s" is often used as a shorthand for indicating sarcasm due to it not being easy to infer tone in text, so "/HEAVIEST-S-POSSIBLE" is intended mean that you should read their comment in as sarcastic a tone as possible. So yes, they were being sarcastic.

Thanks for clarification. That was new to me.

Re: .io considered harmful

#199

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is that suppose to be some sort of sarcasm I'm missing, or you just ignore Indigenous people? [1] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_peoples_of_the_Amer...

The “/HEAVIEST-S-POSSIBLE” is an extension of “/s” which is used as an explicit indicator of sarcasm.

Thanks for clarification

Re: .io considered harmful

#200
post #128

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Every .io domain you renew legitimises and reinforces the continued exile of the Chagossians. The history there is unfortunate (although the history lesson itself is welcome), but at the same time this is akin to saying: you should boycott products and services from the UK/US. If you feel that way, you can try to do that, but I get the feeling that purely logistically that would get pretty difficult to do. Looking…

Well, the thought process is that cents from every .io registration go to a private equity firm. And none of that money goes to the people who historically lived there and were displaced. So... that's a pretty shitty thing to support (as someone registering a domain), when the alternative is simply "Pick a different TLD." Tbh, ICANN/IANA should either (a) dissolve the TLD as-is, as there is no independent country it…

> The current situation and ownership is indefensible.

It's very easily defensible. BIOT is internationally recognized as a sovereign territory of the UK.

> And none of that money goes to the people who historically lived there and were displaced.

I fail to see how this is relevant. It's a thing that has happened a million times in the past and has been rarely rectified. We don't (and never will) live in a perfect world.

The status quo offers the most certainty, therefore is the best option for holders of .io domain names.

Post reply on HN