I know it isn't popular, but I wish there was a way to use this inside Emacs. Or, vim. I just don't want to use VS Code anymore.
Phind Model beats GPT-4 at coding, with GPT-3.5 speed and 16k context
71–80 of 358 posts
Re: Phind Model beats GPT-4 at coding, with GPT-3.5 speed and 16k context
#72I know it isn't popular, but I wish there was a way to use this inside Emacs. Or, vim. I just don't want to use VS Code anymore.
There's an argument that music and the arts are dumbed down by the fact that, for instance, making an album worth $10 to millions of people pays way better than making an album worth a million dollars to tens of people, since the album is going to get priced at $10 one way or the other. It only just now occurred to me that the same phenomenon applies to tools.
Re: Phind Model beats GPT-4 at coding, with GPT-3.5 speed and 16k context
#73I tried this question and GPT4 did way way better to getting closer to a final answer. Phind was horribly wrong. I can't help but think something seems off with your eval given just how badly Phind did on this. I want to make an interactive plot in Colab where I can show X axis is interest rate of a 15 year mortgage. Y axis is the relative advantage of buying a house vs. renting in terms of total net worth at 15 year…
Re: Phind Model beats GPT-4 at coding, with GPT-3.5 speed and 16k context
#74Didn't work fine when I asked it a design question: the code and API it used is not correct. GPT-4 did a better job. https://www.phind.com/search?cache=ay8rx37gq8oy3z7uixftlqkt https://chat.openai.com/share/a3a91dcc-a91a-4b04-8afd-40bd1a...
I think you might get a better answer if you rewrote your prompt using full sentences and more formal language.
Re: Phind Model beats GPT-4 at coding, with GPT-3.5 speed and 16k context
#75Re: Phind Model beats GPT-4 at coding, with GPT-3.5 speed and 16k context
#76I tried this, but I still have yet to get any LLM to answer me a programming question (that actually works) that I actually want to solve. Basically: "How can I send network control commands to an AppleTV in C#" They always make up some nonexistent library or gives an example using some nonexistent API.
Re: Phind Model beats GPT-4 at coding, with GPT-3.5 speed and 16k context
#77I know it isn't popular, but I wish there was a way to use this inside Emacs. Or, vim. I just don't want to use VS Code anymore.
Re: Phind Model beats GPT-4 at coding, with GPT-3.5 speed and 16k context
#78Could you please provide me with a query for my PostgreSQL table? It consists of three columns: 'id,' 'teaser,' and 'full_text,' all of which are of type 'text.' Most 'full_text' entries are articles around 1000 words in length. I'd like to update the 'teaser' column for each row with the first approximately 200 words from the 'full_text' column. How can I achieve this?
Phind:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION get_first_n_words(text, integer)
RETURNS text AS $$
DECLARE
word_count integer := 0;
word_start integer := 1;
word_end integer;
BEGIN
WHILE word_count
GPT4: UPDATE your_table_name
SET teaser = (
SELECT STRING_AGG(word, ' ')
FROM (
SELECT SPLIT_PART(full_text, ' ', i) AS word
FROM generate_series(1, 200) AS i
) AS words
WHERE word ''
)
WHERE full_text IS NOT NULL;Re: Phind Model beats GPT-4 at coding, with GPT-3.5 speed and 16k context
#79They're smashing it and can't do enough if you report an issue, also they have started a weekly voice call to discuss algos and such with senior devs, like a surgery, only 10 people join at moment
Don't think I've ever recommended anything as much as I have these guys in last couple of months
Re: Phind Model beats GPT-4 at coding, with GPT-3.5 speed and 16k context
#80In my experience, Phind is not as good as GPT4, but it's by far the second best LLM for programming. I find that tremendously impressive considering they are competing against the whole world for that title right now. I agree with the assessment about consistency being its major flaw. While with GPT4 I can continue a conversation for quite long, Phind easily looses the required context. Perhaps it has to do with summ…