The ensuing discussion is good. I recommend you all read this reply; I laughed pretty hard https://lists.csail.mit.edu/pipermail/csail-related/2012-Jan... .
Stallman: "Facebook is an international parasitism project."
31–40 of 300 posts
Re: Stallman: "Facebook is an international parasitism project."
#32This is the only time I've ever agreed with RMS. Facebook is a disease. Please do not require me to log in to it for your cause.
The worst part about it is oftentimes it makes the most sense to require Facebook for login. The gains are: 1) development and maintenance of only one login system. and 2) Easy integrated sharing/liking to expand support for your cause.
You can't really expect to win a rational argument with a site owner who sees how the benefits of requiring Facebook outweigh the perceived costs.
Re: Stallman: "Facebook is an international parasitism project."
#33My wife recently convinced me to give it another try. I didn't use my complete name, and was judicious about the information I associated with my profile. And yet, I proceeded to connect in a deep and healthy way with some people that I'd fallen out of touch with, and nurtured some newer relationships.
It's a tool that has a Tendency to be dangerous, prying, and abusive to its members. But even as a field of vast moral hazard, I've come to view it as "navigable and worth the risks."
Perhaps not the most glowing endorsement, but if they can convince me they're more valuable than they are dangerous, they've really done some things right in the last few years.
Re: Stallman: "Facebook is an international parasitism project."
#34When I was a kid, my parents sent me to camp, even though all I wanted to do was sit home and write text adventures in BASIC. I hated camp. I hated the kids, and the counselors, and most of all I hated how everyone acted like if you didn't like it, if you weren't having fun, then there was something messed up about you . Facebook = camp. The most oppressive and authoritarian thing about it is, at root, that most peop…
Google had a huge shot at making an alternative, and although the G+ community is vibrant, the product has failed to reach the potential that it had. And there are many privacy concerns with that platform as well, because every massive social network needs revenue.
Re: Stallman: "Facebook is an international parasitism project."
#35I love rms, but he needs to learn to spend his time speaking for things and not against things. How'd the campaign against Apple go, rms?
Re: Stallman: "Facebook is an international parasitism project."
#36When I was a kid, my parents sent me to camp, even though all I wanted to do was sit home and write text adventures in BASIC. I hated camp. I hated the kids, and the counselors, and most of all I hated how everyone acted like if you didn't like it, if you weren't having fun, then there was something messed up about you . Facebook = camp. The most oppressive and authoritarian thing about it is, at root, that most peop…
None of my colleagues have Facebook. They have fine lives. They don't give a shit about Facebook, it doesn't have to be part of your life at all.
Re: Stallman: "Facebook is an international parasitism project."
#37Said the man who reads web pages through an email client.
Thanks for the downvotes, everyone. My point was that even though he happens to be spot-on in his very pithy remark about the disease that is Facebook, if you know anything at all about RMS -- or have interacted with him personally, for a minute or two -- you'll know that he's so far off the page from the vast bulk of humanity (in terms of how he communicates) that it's difficult to take anything he says about the pr…
Re: Stallman: "Facebook is an international parasitism project."
#38Outspoken misanthrope with poor social skills and a tendency towards an absolutist black/white view of the world dislikes social networking? Color me surprised...
Re: Stallman: "Facebook is an international parasitism project."
#39Re: Stallman: "Facebook is an international parasitism project."
#40Stallman is almost always polarizing, but there's something here. Does FB make society less or more efficient? Where's the proof?