Live data from Hacker News

.io considered harmful

beep.blog

31–40 of 254 posts

Re: .io considered harmful

#31
post #4
post #3

Isn’t funding .uk and .us domains just as bad then, if you’re going by the amount of blood that is on a countries hands(regarding this particular piece of history, or all of it)?

The article is clearly a virtue signal. If the person developing the solution doesnt want to pay for the .io domain, then so be it. They don't have to get the morality into it.

And posting your comment is vice signaling.

Re: .io considered harmful

#32
post #5
post #2

I would go further and say this: Never treat foreign ccTLD’s (two-letter domains) as anything you can just register and use a domain in. You should only ever use a ccTLD of your own country or region you actually have your main presence in. Your domain name is often your most secure key to your entire online identity, and you want that to be on as a secure legal footing as possible. Older discussion here: https://new…

I know this is good advice, but I simply value vanity TLDs too much to ever stop. I've got all of my projects' domains on absurd gTLDs and I'd never have it any other way. My users enjoy it and so do I.

what is vain about having a domain?

Re: .io considered harmful

#33
post #2

I would go further and say this: Never treat foreign ccTLD’s (two-letter domains) as anything you can just register and use a domain in. You should only ever use a ccTLD of your own country or region you actually have your main presence in. Your domain name is often your most secure key to your entire online identity, and you want that to be on as a secure legal footing as possible. Older discussion here: https://new…

Not the best advice for authoritarian countries, where you domain can be seized for any reason or subjected to random repressive policies.

Re: .io considered harmful

#34

Here's a thought -- TLD's shouldn't be coupled to countries at all and should just be a string pointer to an IP address. But that's none of my business...

No, thank you. I like to know that .go(v?).ccTLD are the official website of the government of my country.

Re: .io considered harmful

#35
post #19
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The article is clearly a virtue signal. If the person developing the solution doesnt want to pay for the .io domain, then so be it. They don't have to get the morality into it.

how is it a "virtue signal"? what are they signalling? i'm curious where morality fits in to anything in your worldview if telling the (well-documented) history of a forcible displacement of a people is "virtue signalling" and "getting the morality into it".

Virtue signaling is the expression of a conspicuous, self-righteous moral viewpoint with the intent of communicating good character. It doesn't actually have to be virtuous, it only needs to signal virtue to others.

Virtue signalling usually does not genuinely solve anything anyway it's merely supposed to impress upon you that "this person is good", that's the entire goal. Whether it's meaningful or not doesn't enter into it.

Re: .io considered harmful

#37
post #2

I would go further and say this: Never treat foreign ccTLD’s (two-letter domains) as anything you can just register and use a domain in. You should only ever use a ccTLD of your own country or region you actually have your main presence in. Your domain name is often your most secure key to your entire online identity, and you want that to be on as a secure legal footing as possible. Older discussion here: https://new…

Not the best advice for authoritarian countries, where you domain can be seized for any reason or subjected to random repressive policies.

Of course, there are exceptions. In some places, your only viable alternative might be .onion.

Re: .io considered harmful

#38
post #32
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I know this is good advice, but I simply value vanity TLDs too much to ever stop. I've got all of my projects' domains on absurd gTLDs and I'd never have it any other way. My users enjoy it and so do I.

what is vain about having a domain?

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vanity_domain&old...>

Re: .io considered harmful

#39
post #25
post #2

I would go further and say this: Never treat foreign ccTLD’s (two-letter domains) as anything you can just register and use a domain in. You should only ever use a ccTLD of your own country or region you actually have your main presence in. Your domain name is often your most secure key to your entire online identity, and you want that to be on as a secure legal footing as possible. Older discussion here: https://new…

what about .me ?

Are you a citizen of Montenegro? If you are, feel free to use it! Otherwise, I suggest that you use something else.

Re: .io considered harmful

#40
The article starts with "everything is FACT"

then ends with:

Every .io domain you buy funds a government committing crimes against humanity. Every .io domain you renew legitimises and reinforces the continued exile of the Chagossians.

which is hyperbole at best, and bollocks at worst. .io isn't sold or owned by the british (or US) government

Most people don't understand what .io is for, moreover the UK goverment has almost no idea what .io stands for.

so to say that its supporting crimes against humanity is somewhat of a stretch. Thats like saying that watching pakistan play cricket is supporting the deportation of 1.4 million afghan refugees.

Post reply on HN