Huberman Husbands and the rise of self-optimization
1–10 of 19 posts
Re: Huberman Husbands and the rise of self-optimization
#2I have only watched a handful of episodes of the Huberman podcast, but I really appreciated that they have an actionable science-based takeway to help with the area you want to focus on.
Re: Huberman Husbands and the rise of self-optimization
#3This seems unnecessarily negative towards the trend of self-optimization. Self help media has been around for a long time, and this is just a new evolution of it targeted to a specific audience. I have only watched a handful of episodes of the Huberman podcast, but I really appreciated that they have an actionable science-based takeway to help with the area you want to focus on.
Re: Huberman Husbands and the rise of self-optimization
#4This seems unnecessarily negative towards the trend of self-optimization. Self help media has been around for a long time, and this is just a new evolution of it targeted to a specific audience. I have only watched a handful of episodes of the Huberman podcast, but I really appreciated that they have an actionable science-based takeway to help with the area you want to focus on.
Yeah, this article comes off as holier-than-thou and politically charged. It does not attempt to justify its assumptions (Why should improvement be centered on a community? This isn't a truth about the universe or anything like that.)
> I want to be clear that there isn't anything wrong with trying to make yourself better, healthier, or happier. But investigating _why_ we feel the need to optimize ourselves to cope with a system of political and social injustices that make life harder for us without actually questioning the injustices of that very system is not only unhelpful, but it's counterproductive. The people who hold the most power have a great deal of interest in us focusing on bettering ourselves instead of bettering our communities.
You can argue that this wrong in various ways but it's not true that the article fails to make any case.
Re: Huberman Husbands and the rise of self-optimization
#5In our society, good sleep, a good diet, good exercise and a job that doesn't compromise your health are a privilege, not a choice. It's unfortunate but that's what I believe.
I dunno.. just thoughts. But I think putting this out there is worth the downvotes.
Re: Huberman Husbands and the rise of self-optimization
#6Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, this article comes off as holier-than-thou and politically charged. It does not attempt to justify its assumptions (Why should improvement be centered on a community? This isn't a truth about the universe or anything like that.)
I mean, it's right here: > I want to be clear that there isn't anything wrong with trying to make yourself better, healthier, or happier. But investigating _why_ we feel the need to optimize ourselves to cope with a system of political and social injustices that make life harder for us without actually questioning the injustices of that very system is not only unhelpful, but it's counterproductive. The people who hol…
Re: Huberman Husbands and the rise of self-optimization
#7I wonder how much self-optimization is motivated by wanting to demonstrate perceived superiority over other people. In our society, good sleep, a good diet, good exercise and a job that doesn't compromise your health are a privilege, not a choice. It's unfortunate but that's what I believe. I dunno.. just thoughts. But I think putting this out there is worth the downvotes.
Re: Huberman Husbands and the rise of self-optimization
#8Re: Huberman Husbands and the rise of self-optimization
#9I wonder how much self-optimization is motivated by wanting to demonstrate perceived superiority over other people. In our society, good sleep, a good diet, good exercise and a job that doesn't compromise your health are a privilege, not a choice. It's unfortunate but that's what I believe. I dunno.. just thoughts. But I think putting this out there is worth the downvotes.
Re: Huberman Husbands and the rise of self-optimization
#10Unfortunately the article did not improve after this.