Live data from Hacker News

Apple's Blue Ocean

hypercritical.co

121–130 of 262 posts

Re: Apple's Blue Ocean

#121
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

30min of standby capacity for an internal lil battery, external poptarts galore? I don't hate it. It's kind of an interesting play because apple could make a super thin phone that has 30 min battery life and then a few different size pop tarts with different capacities. You want 3 days, get the mondo brick.

How is that materially different from what Apple already has?

Apple can charge the same prize for the phone and upsell you on the battery :-)

Re: Apple's Blue Ocean

#122
post #108

Earlier quoted context omitted.

With a large 4K screen, I'm not seeing any benefit for MST, and studies have shown it decreases productivity after 2 screens. The other problems are simply fixed with using iCloud and treating your laptop as a disposable, which many laptops have been designed as. If you use the MacBook add intended and invest in apple care it's unbeatable.

Any source for said studies? As an engineer I often find my current 2 external monitors limiting and wish I had four.

It never ends. I have 4 monitors and sometimes wish I had 5 or 6. If I could physically fit more monitors on my desk, I would.

Re: Apple's Blue Ocean

#123
post #77

Two things I've been waiting on for years: • MST (DisplayPort daisy chaining) in MacOS. The hardware has supported it for over a decade. The OS is the weak link here. It's the difference between spending $75-$300 for a dock in addition to the cables and just connecting the monitors together along with a single cable to the first monitor. • Non-soldered storage. Seriously. Storage is the most likely component to fail.…

> Storage is the most likely component to fail.

Got any sources for that? I find that hard to believe.

> MST (DisplayPort daisy chaining) in MacOS. The hardware has supported it for over a decade. The OS is the weak link here.

This is indeed annoying, but with USB4/Thunderbolt support becoming more common in monitors, I believe this is going to be less of an issue going forward.

Re: Apple's Blue Ocean

#124
post #2

Make battery packs (call them "removable batteries, if you like") 100% completely and totally separate from the device itself - think of it like a UPS for a desktop...no (or practically "no") battery on/in the device, and instead you run the device with a Qi-compatible battery pack IOW - the device becomes 30-50% lighter (on its own), and the buyer determines how heavy his/her experience will be based on which Qi-pac…

This is basically what they're doing with the Vision Pro, though out of engineering necessity rather than preference: the headset by itself only has about 5 minutes of battery life, to give you just enough margin to swap out the external battery pack you keep in a pocket.

Hopefully that internal battery is purely optional, i.e. implemented like in most laptops and not like in most phones, where it's impossible to use a device with a dead battery even when externally powered. Otherwise it'd be the worst of both worlds.

Re: Apple's Blue Ocean

#125
post #108

Earlier quoted context omitted.

With a large 4K screen, I'm not seeing any benefit for MST, and studies have shown it decreases productivity after 2 screens. The other problems are simply fixed with using iCloud and treating your laptop as a disposable, which many laptops have been designed as. If you use the MacBook add intended and invest in apple care it's unbeatable.

Any source for said studies? As an engineer I often find my current 2 external monitors limiting and wish I had four.

NYT in 2014, (personal experience too). https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/20/technology/personaltech/s... this advocates for one monitor https://hackernoon.com/why-i-stopped-using-multiple-monitors... the tl;dr is that mutiple screens mean more distractions, and some tasks are better with 2 monitors but the studies don't indicate it's universal.

Re: Apple's Blue Ocean

#126

Nintendo died by hiding in the corner, being afraid to compete, not making anything cool, and instead making something nobody wanted in a category too small to sustain itself.

Nintendo died? Who's making these nice, popular hybrid portable/docked consoles then that I see all around my friends' living rooms and on public transit?

Re: Apple's Blue Ocean

#127
post #103

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Most people don't write terabytes per day and the ones who do can just double their storage.

But they do, specially in low RAM systems, as the SSD becomes like a backup ram to juggle extra information.

I remember modding osx Yosemite to run the swap in the ram when I had an SSD since I was so worried about it, not sure if it still does this but with the infrequently of negative problems and the fact that one of my friends used a 2gb MacBook air 2009 until 2017 made me realize it probably doesn't matter.

Re: Apple's Blue Ocean

#128
post #125

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Any source for said studies? As an engineer I often find my current 2 external monitors limiting and wish I had four.

NYT in 2014, (personal experience too). https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/20/technology/personaltech/s... this advocates for one monitor https://hackernoon.com/why-i-stopped-using-multiple-monitors... the tl;dr is that mutiple screens mean more distractions, and some tasks are better with 2 monitors but the studies don't indicate it's universal.

These aren't studies, just anecdotes, and the actual study quoted in the NYT shows the opposite:

> One study commissioned by NEC and conducted by researchers at the University of Utah showed that people using a dual-display machine to do a text-editing task were 44 percent more productive than those who used a single monitor.

I think it's fair to say that any research from 2014 isn't the most relevant now. Both screen size and (importantly) software has changed to better support both multiple screen usage as well as large screens.

The argument for single screens in the NYT is mostly that it reduces distractions:

> But for most people, the time spent juggling two windows or scrolling across large documents isn’t the biggest bottleneck in getting work done. Instead, there’s a more basic, pernicious reason you feel constantly behind — you’re getting distracted.

This seems to indicate they were comparing a maximized window on a single screen vs non-maximized windows on multiple screens, and probably in the days before modern notifications on desktop OSs.

Based on this it is fair to say more research is needed, but it is inaccurate to claim that studies support the idea that one monitor is better.

Re: Apple's Blue Ocean

#129
post #77

Two things I've been waiting on for years: • MST (DisplayPort daisy chaining) in MacOS. The hardware has supported it for over a decade. The OS is the weak link here. It's the difference between spending $75-$300 for a dock in addition to the cables and just connecting the monitors together along with a single cable to the first monitor. • Non-soldered storage. Seriously. Storage is the most likely component to fail.…

Apple devices aren't engineered to last; they're engineered to be manufactured, sell new, and sometimes sell expensive repairs by them. Also, NVIDIA cards in eGPUs and Thunderbolt (arm64) aren't supported. The best solution is either don't use Apple, or have a machine under warranty and very good backups. Complaints aside, the Anker 777 dock does 5K-8K DP over USB-C, 1 GbE, 100w charging, 4 USB-A and more and works w…

> Apple devices aren't engineered to last

This doesn't match either my experience, the experience of others I know or the good resale value Apple devices continue to have.

Re: Apple's Blue Ocean

#130

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Apple devices aren't engineered to last; they're engineered to be manufactured, sell new, and sometimes sell expensive repairs by them. Also, NVIDIA cards in eGPUs and Thunderbolt (arm64) aren't supported. The best solution is either don't use Apple, or have a machine under warranty and very good backups. Complaints aside, the Anker 777 dock does 5K-8K DP over USB-C, 1 GbE, 100w charging, 4 USB-A and more and works w…

All of my apple devices have lasted multiple (4+) years. The only time an apple device hasn’t is because I broke it.

I suppose the interesting question is whether this is true of the newest devices or not. My wife's MacBook Pro lasted 11 years. It finally died this year. Can I expect the MacBook Pro that's replacing it to last 11 years too? Only time will tell. Hope so.
Post reply on HN