Earlier quoted context omitted.
If I stop posting to Hacker News please contact my family.
You may just be a gpt bot impersonating yourself. We can never be sure.
How to catch a wild triangle
41–46 of 46 posts
Re: How to catch a wild triangle
#42> Unfortunately, this method did not allow us to intercept HTTPS traffic of Apple services (including iMessage), as iOS implements SSL pinning for this. Thus, we were not able to decrypt iMessage traffic that came through the VPN. When security helps attackers... that's a bit ironic. Anyway, this article is exactly why I don't want to work in computer security, you constantly have to look behind you, and government A…
Computer security person here! I have yet to be assassinated :)
Re: How to catch a wild triangle
#43> Unfortunately for us, all the communications with the servers in question happened over HTTPS, so we could not recover any additional details from the traffic. This is why your corporate network should MitM all TLS connections by default.
The risk of getting your MitM box compromised is too high IMO
Re: How to catch a wild triangle
#44> Unfortunately, this method did not allow us to intercept HTTPS traffic of Apple services (including iMessage), as iOS implements SSL pinning for this. Thus, we were not able to decrypt iMessage traffic that came through the VPN. When security helps attackers... that's a bit ironic. Anyway, this article is exactly why I don't want to work in computer security, you constantly have to look behind you, and government A…
Computer security person here! I have yet to be assassinated :)
Security means money and can mean violence.
There are computer security people who work for intel agencies, those are the people I am talking about.
Even people who work for securing data of companies, those people might also be targets.
Re: How to catch a wild triangle
#45> Despite many ups and downs, we eventually managed to obtain all the stages used in this attack, including four zero-day exploits reported to Apple, two validators, an implant and its modules. Looks like NSA still hasn't forgiven Kaspersky for exposing STUXNET [1]. It seems that this latest attack on Kaspersky was expensive. Losing 4 zerodays must have been painful. It's also possible that Israel and Unit 8200 [2] w…
no way in hell the NSA forcibly tries to reinfect targets over and over, that's not their modus operandi. Instead they would have spend money to find a persistence on the infected device. The fact that the attacker has almost a full-chain but no persistence screams to me "second fiddle", probably a nation state that have access to 0-days brokers but no in-house engineering.
Re: How to catch a wild triangle
#46Ooh, I really enjoyed this devlog. I'd have liked to see where they pointed the finger in terms of who they think sent these off, but in case you're too lazy to read: a .watchface file sent over iMessage was used to hoist up enough power to delete all records of the iMessage and open two-way encrypted communications with a local binary. Figuring that out led to (I think?) four zero-day reports to Apple, and a substan…