Live data from Hacker News

Meta sued by states over harmful youth marketing

bloomberg.com

61–70 of 483 posts

Re: Meta sued by states over harmful youth marketing

#62
Growing up, I knew maybe two or three kids that had emotional problems. Now (as an adult with grown kids) I hardly know any families that don’t have such a person. I’m sure part of it is we’re more open, which is great, but I can’t attribute all of it to that. The rising generation is really struggling. My guess is social media, but maybe it’s environmental pollution or something similar. I live in the US for what it’s worth.

Re: Meta sued by states over harmful youth marketing

#63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Let's assume that the lawsuits are poorly constructed. That does not necessarily mean that Facebook is harmless. It just means these lawsuits aren't sufficient to prove harm. Consider this analogy: Just because the DA doesn't have enough evidence to convict in a murder trial, that doesn't mean that the defendant is innocent. I just means they haven't been proven guilty.

We tend to presume innocence until proven otherwise.

Presuming innocence doesn't make him actually, literally innocent. The reality of what happened is what it is, regardless of whether anybody can prove it to a legal standard.

Also, when you say "We tend to presume innocence", that's not really true. It's true (or is supposed to be true) for the government and people who want to be civically responsible, but a whole lot of the general population does not actually think this way. People think OJ did it, have various theories about who killed JFK, etc. People read the news about somebody accused of murder and think "yeah, that guy probably did it."

Re: Meta sued by states over harmful youth marketing

#64
Shout outs to the person who wrote this:

> My reason for reducing my social media presence is the Like count next to every thought expressed. By adding a publicly visible number next to every expressed human thought, you influence behavior and thinking.

-- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19325515

Re: Meta sued by states over harmful youth marketing

#65
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Both censorship and advertising regulations both exist in accordance with the first amendment.

Yes: censorship is prohibited, at least outside of specific narrow circumstances. Advertising regulations specifically regulate advertising products. Neither of these translate into regulating what can and cannot be said on social media, outside of narrow cases like promotional or sponsored content.

Who said this had to do with censorship of content? The issue with social media is algorithms have been fine tuned to incite FOMO, narcissism, self-esteem issues, etc., and keep people addicted/endlessly scrolling.

Re: Meta sued by states over harmful youth marketing

#67
Behind every great fortune is a great crime…

As usual, American society superficially protects children while the most harmful perpetrators are given near-absolute access.

I really think the addictive qualities of video games should garner the amount of attention these social media companies generate. Actually, anything that takes your time and gives you nothing is suspect. As always, nothing will save you from a grift except knowledge.

Re: Meta sued by states over harmful youth marketing

#68

When will social media finally be regulated like alcohol, nicotine, and every other addictive poison?

When the First Amendment is repealed.

What about in the rest of the world where the first amendment doesn't apply?

Re: Meta sued by states over harmful youth marketing

#70

Behind every great fortune is a great crime… As usual, American society superficially protects children while the most harmful perpetrators are given near-absolute access. I really think the addictive qualities of video games should garner the amount of attention these social media companies generate. Actually, anything that takes your time and gives you nothing is suspect. As always, nothing will save you from a gri…

[deleted]
Post reply on HN