Live data from Hacker News

OpenAI Finally Allows ChatGPT Complete Internet Access

gizmodo.com

61–70 of 118 posts

Re: OpenAI Finally Allows ChatGPT Complete Internet Access

#61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Have you tried perplexity.ai? It has become my go-to for LLM + browsing. It is really fast and does a pretty good job with retrieval and summarization.

Do you know what model perplexity uses under the hood? I just tried it out with my normal test queries and found it to be far worse than Google's Bard.

To be fair, Bard has massively improved recently and can in my brief experience even outperform 3.5-turbo for lots of things.

Re: OpenAI Finally Allows ChatGPT Complete Internet Access

#63
post #13

I've been relatively unimpressed with the ChatGPT browse mode. My problem with it is that it seems to run really obvious, naive searches. Most of the time I ask it something, then see what it's searching for and think "oh no, that's not going to return anything more useful than what I could have found myself". It's also pretty slow. I'm very much looking forward to having a search assistant which can go ahead and wad…

Metaphor (https://metaphor.systems) has a ChatGPT plugin that works pretty well. I asked for home battery systems, here's what I got: https://chat.openai.com/share/3ce0687d-6ffa-4c02-8957-d8787a...

Re: OpenAI Finally Allows ChatGPT Complete Internet Access

#64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This time it's not scraping the internet (like a robot) but actually acting as a direct user agent for the human typing their prompt, so I wouldn't be against them ignoring robots.txt.

Wait, so a simple web scraper script has to comply with robots.txt. But if I want to completely ignore the robots.txt, I only have to make my script more complicated (ChatGPT)?

I'd like to consider this a difference between script action and user action.

For example if you make a web page a user pulls up that calls another webpage, is that a user action, a script action, a mix of both? I personally would consider it a user action.

Re: OpenAI Finally Allows ChatGPT Complete Internet Access

#65
post #47
post #29

The amount of sites I regularly use with ChatGPT that are blocking AI agents has increased to the point where this feature is not that useful for me anymore. I can only see that amount increasing.

I wonder if AI generated web pages block AI agents from indexing their content, like, one engine indexing the other's content in a loop until the amount of digital garbage is so gigantic that is the end of the information era, or how are we ever stopping this? What is our failsafe?

AI Kessler Syndrome. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kessler_syndrome

Re: OpenAI Finally Allows ChatGPT Complete Internet Access

#66
post #13

I've been relatively unimpressed with the ChatGPT browse mode. My problem with it is that it seems to run really obvious, naive searches. Most of the time I ask it something, then see what it's searching for and think "oh no, that's not going to return anything more useful than what I could have found myself". It's also pretty slow. I'm very much looking forward to having a search assistant which can go ahead and wad…

Have you tried perplexity.ai? It has become my go-to for LLM + browsing. It is really fast and does a pretty good job with retrieval and summarization.

I love Perplexity.

Re: OpenAI Finally Allows ChatGPT Complete Internet Access

#67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Have you tried perplexity.ai? It has become my go-to for LLM + browsing. It is really fast and does a pretty good job with retrieval and summarization.

Do you know what model perplexity uses under the hood? I just tried it out with my normal test queries and found it to be far worse than Google's Bard.

I'd disagree by far. I use Perplexity as my main search engine and am a paid subscriber. Copilot with GPT-4 or Claude is fantastic.

Re: OpenAI Finally Allows ChatGPT Complete Internet Access

#68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This time it's not scraping the internet (like a robot) but actually acting as a direct user agent for the human typing their prompt, so I wouldn't be against them ignoring robots.txt.

My understanding is that the philosophy behind robots.txt is owners not wanting their content automatically included in someone else's product, if not duplicated and recorded wholesale. The important idea seems to be ownership, not the ability to browse. If OpenAI had two agents, one with no memory, and one with a memory, that would be better: you could disallow ChaptGPT-storage and allow ChatGPT-user, for example. B…

> My understanding is that the philosophy behind robots.txt is owners not wanting their content automatically included in someone else's product

Not really. That use case is done, of course, but the primary purpose of robots.txt is to help crawlers by indicating what parts of the website are appropriate to be searched and what parts aren't.

Robots.txt is not intended primarily as a means to defend a site against crawlers. That's why it relies on the goodwill of crawlers to work.

Re: OpenAI Finally Allows ChatGPT Complete Internet Access

#69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've seen no suggestion of them not honouring robots.txt... I suspect that any case of them not honoring it is probably due to your site content being available on archive.org or common crawl or some other service.

Is there an open license or ToS that would disallow OpenAI access?

Apparently openai and the rest of defendants claim that if it’s on the internet it’s “fair use”. Meaning they’ll do all they can tk steal your work regardless of licensing or robots.txt rules.

Re: OpenAI Finally Allows ChatGPT Complete Internet Access

#70

Is there a complete list of ip addresses openai uses for scraping? I suppose they dont honour robots.txt, despite claiming to do so, and this may be one way to reliably block them.

If your concern is that you don't want the contents of your site to be used to train AI, then OpenAI is not the only entity you need to protect against. Other crawlers may not respect robots.txt, and blocking by IP address is just a game of whack-a-mole that you can't win.

This is why I took down some of my sites, and put a login in front of the rest. Until I have some solid means of defense, I can't think of any other effective approach.

Post reply on HN