Live data from Hacker News

Cooler screens

computer.rip

81–90 of 253 posts

Re: Cooler screens

#81
A tempting target for a bit of hacktivism - break in and display some Banksys, pages from Marx, porn, whatever. Seems like there's some issues with the hardware engineering so no particular reason to expect the software side to be any better.

I have seen these in the wild. They're hilariously awful. Best thing about them is the computer.rip article which is entertaining and well written.

Re: Cooler screens

#82
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not feasible to make glass doors on coolers much thicker, or else they'd be too heavy to move for a significant portion of the population without a motor or hydraulics.

Insulating glass better doesn't usually involve making the glass thicker; glass is a reasonably good heat conductor. It usually involves more, thinner sheets of glass stacked with air gaps between them. Argon is often used instead of air (nitrogen/oxygen) because it is a better insulator.

Adding extra layers of glass increases the thickness and weight of the entire glass assembly, which is colloquially what we refer to as glass thickness in North America.

Maybe it's different from where your from?

Re: Cooler screens

#83
I just had a terrible experience with these at my local Walgreens. The Walgreens itself is in a very poor state, understaffed with unshelved stock sitting in shipping boxes up and down the aisles.

In the cooler aisle I was just looking for some ice cream, and I had to open 5-6 doors to find it. Not only were the displays wrong, upon opening the coolers they were mostly empty.

It was one of those times where I felt like I could be living in some sort of technological satire.

Re: Cooler screens

#84

I was assuming this was some sort of smart shelves idea: you just walk up to the image, scan a QR code, and in the back a human/robot adds your shopping to a cart that you pick up on the way out, and you're automatically billed. But it's just pictures of what's behind the door when you open it?

Half the time the pictures on the door aren't even correct.

Re: Cooler screens

#85
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The gas pumps that play advertisements while your car fills are incredibly obnoxious and makes me regret being a customer. Deface them. This is legitimate defense.

Destroying someone else's property is seldom the answer.

it is in this case though, if they're too expensive to maintain they'll stop installing them

Re: Cooler screens

#86
post #14

Is anyone else repulsed by this stuff? The gas pumps that play advertisements while your car fills are incredibly obnoxious and makes me regret being a customer. I think of "tax what you want less of".

> The gas pumps that play advertisements while your car fills are incredibly obnoxious and makes me regret being a customer. Deface them. This is legitimate defense.

I live somewhere that a person pumps my gas for me. No ads!

Re: Cooler screens

#87
I hate these things, I have seen them in some of the Walgreens around town and I just keep on thinking about the energy wasted both by lighting up the whole screen brightly enough to see in the store, and by customers opening the doors up so they can see what's actually there and letting more cool air out.

I've never seen them displaying ads, just big graphics saying "WATER" or "ICE CREAM" or "MILK" or whatever when there's nobody in front of them. And I find it kind of fascinating how, when they do notice someone's in front of them and deign to switch to showing the inventory, my brain just completely slides off of the crisp pictures of the drinks on a bright white background. Even before the first time I opened one up to find that it was inaccurate, it felt like my brain just knew that the inventory would not necessarily match what would actually be in there, so why bother wasting energy parsing it?

(And this is with them all working, largely as designed.)

I am glad to know they are on the way out. "'Vegas' in a derogatory way" is a good summation of my reaction to them.

Re: Cooler screens

#88
Half of me thinks this is a stupid idea but the other half of me is fascinated with "mixed reality" turned inside out and would love the opportunity to paint motion graphics on a canvas this big.

---

Bloomberg Businessweek has run a series of articles about the problems at Walgreens.

https://www.google.com/search?q=walgreens+bloomberg

They just settled a shareholder lawsuit over the failed takeover of Rite Aid.

(I patronize Walgreens quite a lot because they are one of the closest stores to my location, mine used to be a Rite Aid.)

Before that they merged with the Boots chain in the U.K. and got the idea that they could increase sales in the front of the store (e.g. not pharmacy) but they didn't seem to understand the "cost disease" in the U.S. that makes health care an order of magnitude more expensive than anything else such that CVS, doubling down on health care, had the right strategy.

The pharmacy staff at our Walgreens deal heroically with a huge amount of brokenness, there was the time I needed a prescription filled in a hurry and they called around and found a competing pharmacy that had it in stock and sent over all my data including my insurance for one of those "seamless" experiences that marketers are always talking about. Then there was the time I came on Friday and they told me they could have it ready in 30 minutes but I said "No, I'll come tomorrow because I want to make it to a football game" and they said it would be ready the next day.

Well the next day they weren't able to fill any prescriptions because of some electrical failure that had technicians working in there. It turned out the pharmacist, because of a worker shortage, had driven two hours to get to work that morning! He also told me that they couldn't fill the prescription just yet anyway because my refill only became available the next day to which my reply was "I wanted to get the ball started early in case something went wrong."

Re: Cooler screens

#89
post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You haven't provided a better solution.

Why would I need to provide a better solution to property damage? It should be obvious, vote with your dollar, don't pump gas there.

At some point property damage really is self defense if said property is actively engaging in what amounts to assault. And vote-with-your-dollar is silly advice when we cannot assume there are available alternatives, and when the "disruptors" and "marketing wizards" involved with this crap are explicitly reaching for captive-audiences, do not provide volume controls or off buttons, etc. Sometimes the gas station ads start up blaring noise after you've already paid, so you can't tell when you're going to get hit with them. And good luck finding a taxi or an airline without a screen blasting at you, effectively further monetizing people even though they are already paying for a service. Even first-class passengers everywhere are subjected at minimum to a litany of "join our miles club" crap every time they fly. If passengers aren't force-fed this stuff on the screen in front of them, it will be on the PA system, which really ought to be reserved for actual information/emergencies and not used as part of "captive audience" shenanigans to improve someone's margins. This behavior is sickening and should really be illegal. Since it's not illegal to engage in assault-through-advertising though, property damage starts to look like the only way for consumers to speak a language that corporations understand, i.e. by affecting bottom-lines and margins.

Re: Cooler screens

#90
post #2

Some images in this article for those who haven’t seen them: https://www.businessinsider.com/cooler-screens-make-it-harde...

The last one is great:

> Out of order, please do not open

> [opens door]

> [finds food]

And it's not like it's the cooling unit that broke, you can see when the door is open it's still one big area connected to the working one next to it.

Post reply on HN