Earlier quoted context omitted.
>And in case of some substances like drugs if you reduce dosage or adjust protocol so that trip doesn't happen means that you also got rid of any significant effect it might have on the brain. We agree. My point is that the evidence seems to be going in the direction of: 1. removing transcendence removes part of the benefit; and, 2. to complicate matters, many protocols fail to properly control for transcendent exper…
> We're both materialists. Mine is a materialist position. I'm not quite sure about you because you are using words like transcendence. ;-) In my view the deep experience of the trip, what you call transcendence, is just another hallucination, just hallucination of meaning and understanding instead of simple images, sounds or sensations.
Ketamine's effect on depression may hinge on hope
261–270 of 276 posts
Re: Ketamine's effect on depression may hinge on hope
#262Earlier quoted context omitted.
I believe I addressed the question of materialism vs dualism in my original comment?
Did you edit the comment? I don't recall seeing the footnote before. In any case it was a rhetorical question to understand your reasoning, as I personally don't take a stance on whether a soul exists or not.
Re: Ketamine's effect on depression may hinge on hope
#263After reading research about this a few months ago, I made https://ketamine.games It's totally free, private, with no tracking analytics, and many Reddit users have reported increased success using.
> On your Android device, open Chrome Chrome
Re: Ketamine's effect on depression may hinge on hope
#264Earlier quoted context omitted.
Umm... that's much more likely to be opiates and meth, and the criminalization hasn't especially helped with those either. Not to mention, the language you use is really cruel.
Likewise I think non-enforcement of drug laws tacitly permitting people to self-destruct in the streets is really cruel
Re: Ketamine's effect on depression may hinge on hope
#265Re: Ketamine's effect on depression may hinge on hope
#266Earlier quoted context omitted.
If qualia are not different that our “neurological machinery” (and all available evidence shows this so far, not least the incoherence of definitions of qualia that try to exclude such) then medicine is already considering such as a major parameter. If they are different (and exist at all) then such needs to be demonstrated before they can be reliably considered. Given even proponents of qualia can’t reliably agree w…
>If qualia are not different that our “neurological machinery” (and all available evidence shows this so far, not least the incoherence of definitions of qualia that try to exclude such) then medicine is already considering such as a major parameter. No, they are definitely not. I don't see anything in these studies to the effect of "hey, it's the feeling that they feel that's making them better". They're looking for…
That’s called “the placebo effect” and it’s one of the most studied & controlled for factors in ANY medical testing.
Re: Ketamine's effect on depression may hinge on hope
#267Earlier quoted context omitted.
If qualia are not different that our “neurological machinery” (and all available evidence shows this so far, not least the incoherence of definitions of qualia that try to exclude such) then medicine is already considering such as a major parameter. If they are different (and exist at all) then such needs to be demonstrated before they can be reliably considered. Given even proponents of qualia can’t reliably agree w…
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qualia-knowledge/
The “substantial revisions” after 17 years to that paper are—rather weak—responses to objections raised in the 90s and should have been in their 2002 paper. Worse, they’re responses that have their own major objections by 2002 anyhow.
Not sure what your aim was but I guess thank you for underscoring my point rather perfectly?
Re: Ketamine's effect on depression may hinge on hope
#268Earlier quoted context omitted.
If qualia are not different that our “neurological machinery” (and all available evidence shows this so far, not least the incoherence of definitions of qualia that try to exclude such) then medicine is already considering such as a major parameter. If they are different (and exist at all) then such needs to be demonstrated before they can be reliably considered. Given even proponents of qualia can’t reliably agree w…
The way I would rephrase OP is "what is the most useful abstraction for the mechanism of action of these drugs". It might be that limiting yourself to neurological phenomena gives you a much longer, more unwieldy model of what's happening here than an equally predictive model that centers on subjective experience.
I’m fine with including other phenomena. As I said in my original comment though: those phenomena need to be demonstrated to exist, first.
Until then it’s absolutely unscientific, and medically unsound, to assume they exist & then hope that they magically work. Because that is not science: that’s quackery.
Re: Ketamine's effect on depression may hinge on hope
#269Earlier quoted context omitted.
The way I would rephrase OP is "what is the most useful abstraction for the mechanism of action of these drugs". It might be that limiting yourself to neurological phenomena gives you a much longer, more unwieldy model of what's happening here than an equally predictive model that centers on subjective experience.
Nit: my feelings are closer to "we are ignoring one of possibly many useful abstractions", but otherwise yes. If I'm being pedantic here, it's that I really don't want to downplay the importance of the pharmacological level of analysis. It's a very useful analysis. It's just not a complete theory of life well-lived.
Believe me, I’d be the first to suggest they be considered if we had that. We don’t. It would be great if we did.
Until then it’s not medicine, it’s shamanism.
Re: Ketamine's effect on depression may hinge on hope
#270Earlier quoted context omitted.
But why call them spiritual experiences when hallucinations will do even better?
"Do people have ideas or do ideas have people?" might have something to do with the phenomenon of different humans preferring different labels for the same thing.