Live data from Hacker News

Please Pay for a Year of Nothing

joe-steel.com

281–289 of 289 posts

Re: Please Pay for a Year of Nothing

#281

I honestly can never understand people who say there is not enough good content on streamers. Every single service I have subscribed to has way more content that I want to watch than time I have to watch it. I watch maybe an hour a night, and I have a huge backlog of shows I’d like to watch that I slowly work through. Even my current list will take me years, and I have new shows to add all the time. Are these people…

> I honestly can never understand people who say there is not enough good content on streamers. What is there that is worth watching? They don’t make anything good anymore: no Seinfeld, no Office, no Parks & Rec, no Castle, no Bones, no House. Everything new is terrible, often embarrassingly so. It’s as though sometime in the last decade all the talent and skill left media, and now we have corporations and people goi…

If you like those sitcoms then you would probably like stuff on Hulu: Animal Control, Abbot Elementary, Superstore, Only Murders, etc. You can also rewatch Always Sunny, ER, and a bunch more. (Oh and "Dave" which is new and brilliant).

HBO's entire catalog is full of bangers, many of which I still haven't seen yet.

Re: Please Pay for a Year of Nothing

#282
post #250
post #237

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I disagree. Amazon Prime has an obnoxious UI, HBO until recently at least was even worse. Those other providers feel like these airplane interfaces for media, there is some flimsiness to it.

yeah, from the ones I a have used (Netflix, Disney+, Prime, Maxdome) only Prime is atrocious, all others are not perfect but usable.

I found Netflix to be getting worse and worse till I finally cancelled 1-2 years ago. The interface was doing weird stuff, more and more autoplay, weird suggestions, search results turning to shit.

They were working towards being as bad as prime, but prime was "free" if you subscribed to at least one twitch channel, and Netflix kept raising prices.

Re: Please Pay for a Year of Nothing

#283
post #250

Earlier quoted context omitted.

yeah, from the ones I a have used (Netflix, Disney+, Prime, Maxdome) only Prime is atrocious, all others are not perfect but usable.

I found Netflix to be getting worse and worse till I finally cancelled 1-2 years ago. The interface was doing weird stuff, more and more autoplay, weird suggestions, search results turning to shit. They were working towards being as bad as prime, but prime was "free" if you subscribed to at least one twitch channel, and Netflix kept raising prices.

Technology doesn't seem to be the sticking point that keeps people at particular streaming sites. It's the content that rules the decisions about which service, at least based upon all of the discussions amongst the internets and friends and family.

Re: Please Pay for a Year of Nothing

#284
post #219

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm happy where I am but if I had to jump, it'd be to Mullvad. I personally wouldn't use Nord for free. 2018 Nord's ties to Tesonet. 2019 Data breach. Repeated rewrites of site to handle false claims allegations. Endless reports of performance issues. I guess each of these things can be minimized with enough explainers but why bother? tesonet ref: https://old.reddit.com/r/VPNTorrents/comments/9adi37/i_inves...

Don't tunnel all your traffic through a VPN; only the one which can lead to civil court case with anti parency gang.

I get that. My VPN runs exclusively in a virtual machine. I'll RDP to it when I need to do VPN stuff.

Re: Please Pay for a Year of Nothing

#285

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I honestly can never understand people who say there is not enough good content on streamers. What is there that is worth watching? They don’t make anything good anymore: no Seinfeld, no Office, no Parks & Rec, no Castle, no Bones, no House. Everything new is terrible, often embarrassingly so. It’s as though sometime in the last decade all the talent and skill left media, and now we have corporations and people goi…

If you like those sitcoms then you would probably like stuff on Hulu: Animal Control, Abbot Elementary, Superstore, Only Murders, etc. You can also rewatch Always Sunny, ER, and a bunch more. (Oh and "Dave" which is new and brilliant). HBO's entire catalog is full of bangers, many of which I still haven't seen yet.

Only Murders in the Building is indeed excellent. I never could get into Always Sunny in Philadelphia. I may give Animal Control a shot — your recommendation makes me think I should.

Re: Please Pay for a Year of Nothing

#286

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think a lot of people intuitively understand that there's a difference between pirating the works of JRR Tolkein, him being wildly successful and not alive anymore, and doing the same to an up-and-coming author who's eating ramen a lot. There's no difference legally, though, which is a great object lesson in how there are sharp topological differences between the world of ethics and the world of human law. If you p…

> If you pay for Spotify rather than hacking it, you're really not supporting artists financially very much, right? The majority of your money goes to the artist/right holder, "[Spotify has] an approx revenue split of 70/30 - so that’s 70% to the artist/rights holders and 30% to Spotify."[1] [1] https://dittomusic.com/en/blog/how-much-does-spotify-pay-per... .

70%/30% doesn't sound bad, if true; that's comparable to what Bandcamp was acclaimed for their fairness in paying their artists, if I recall correclty. I wonder what the "trick" is (if any), because I have to doubt the reality of that number. If you know and talk to musicians, it's almost absolutely unanimous that nobody ever earns a dime from any streams even if you are really popular on their platform.

Re: Please Pay for a Year of Nothing

#287
post #174

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think a lot of people intuitively understand that there's a difference between pirating the works of JRR Tolkein, him being wildly successful and not alive anymore, and doing the same to an up-and-coming author who's eating ramen a lot. There's no difference legally, though, which is a great object lesson in how there are sharp topological differences between the world of ethics and the world of human law. If you p…

> If you pay for Spotify rather than hacking it, you're really not supporting artists financially very much, right? Paying someone a millionth of a dollar to stream their music seems to me like kind of an insult, actually, and recording their song to a cassette from the radio like kind of a compliment. This is absurd. One is paying them, the other isn’t. It’s not a “compliment” to not receive income, even if you thin…

I'm sorry that your gut disagrees with the ethical conclusion that most people, including nearly every musician I have talked to, have arrived at - I know that is a crappy feeling to have - but here we are.

Re: Please Pay for a Year of Nothing

#288

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I found Netflix to be getting worse and worse till I finally cancelled 1-2 years ago. The interface was doing weird stuff, more and more autoplay, weird suggestions, search results turning to shit. They were working towards being as bad as prime, but prime was "free" if you subscribed to at least one twitch channel, and Netflix kept raising prices.

Technology doesn't seem to be the sticking point that keeps people at particular streaming sites. It's the content that rules the decisions about which service, at least based upon all of the discussions amongst the internets and friends and family.

To be fair, if they started bad and stayed there (kinda like Amazon), I probably wouldn’t have minded as much. But getting worse over time? Thanks, but no thanks.

Re: Please Pay for a Year of Nothing

#289

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If you pay for Spotify rather than hacking it, you're really not supporting artists financially very much, right? The majority of your money goes to the artist/right holder, "[Spotify has] an approx revenue split of 70/30 - so that’s 70% to the artist/rights holders and 30% to Spotify."[1] [1] https://dittomusic.com/en/blog/how-much-does-spotify-pay-per... .

70%/30% doesn't sound bad, if true; that's comparable to what Bandcamp was acclaimed for their fairness in paying their artists, if I recall correclty. I wonder what the "trick" is (if any), because I have to doubt the reality of that number. If you know and talk to musicians, it's almost absolutely unanimous that nobody ever earns a dime from any streams even if you are really popular on their platform.

Spotify is a public company. They publish their financials.[1]

[1] https://www.statista.com/statistics/370618/spotifys-cost-of-...

Post reply on HN