Live data from Hacker News

Please Pay for a Year of Nothing

joe-steel.com

41–50 of 289 posts

Re: Please Pay for a Year of Nothing

#41
post #15

Basically there was a finite amount of content and a lot of it appeared on Netflix. Then 4+ services launched and a near fixed amount of content was divided by 4. Then they doubled the price. So now for a worse discovery experience you are effectively paying 8x the price.

Why do you say it's a fixed amount of content? Finite, sure, but it's not fixed.

Re: Please Pay for a Year of Nothing

#42
It's a dangerous game producers are playing. Hollywood could burn to the ground right now and I'd be set for years with the content that's already on my hard drive, let alone what's out there on the internet. Keep not producing new content long enough and people are going to start noticing they don't need you to.

Re: Please Pay for a Year of Nothing

#43
post #7

I don’t really care about “new” content. Similar to video games. I consume if it is new or old. If I can’t find content then I’m done with the service. Unfortunately on all these platforms discovery is horrible unless they want you to find it.

I just want a complete list of what's available, alphabetically, and divided by broad genre.

But apparently these services assume everyone is too dumb to scroll through a long list and find things on their own.

So there's a landing page where the same titles appear in four different places on the same page, you have no idea what's available, items disappear without warning because of licensing issues, and the UI looks like something an intern designed.

Which is why I've been watching random niche user-made content on YouTube instead, and it's fresher, more relaxing, and usually more interesting.

Corporate streaming feels like so much effort for so little reward.

Re: Please Pay for a Year of Nothing

#44
post #41
post #15

Basically there was a finite amount of content and a lot of it appeared on Netflix. Then 4+ services launched and a near fixed amount of content was divided by 4. Then they doubled the price. So now for a worse discovery experience you are effectively paying 8x the price.

Why do you say it's a fixed amount of content? Finite, sure, but it's not fixed.

Once you see a detective show, you basically seen 80% of all detective shows. That's why it seems that there can be nothing to watch, because 80% is basically a rehash, just with different characters and slightly different plots.

Re: Please Pay for a Year of Nothing

#45
post #31

One counter point to why I personally pay for Disney+ is that I have kids, and kids love repeat content. I don't think new content particularly matters to them, at least not at their age. I wonder how much Disney+'s numbers will be helped by that tranche of subscribers.

> kids love repeat content Then may I suggest a DVD player?

Honestly, streaming easily wins when you consider the entire family can stream on any screen in the house and Disney DVDs are actually pretty expensive.

Re: Please Pay for a Year of Nothing

#46
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> kids love repeat content Then may I suggest a DVD player?

May I humbly suggest that VHS is superior to DVD for young children, because you can manually censor naughty bits out of “too adult” movies by scratching the magnetic coating off the tape

You can do the same thing with a DVD if you have a needle and a steady hand.

Re: Please Pay for a Year of Nothing

#47
post #44
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why do you say it's a fixed amount of content? Finite, sure, but it's not fixed.

Once you see a detective show, you basically seen 80% of all detective shows. That's why it seems that there can be nothing to watch, because 80% is basically a rehash, just with different characters and slightly different plots.

Yeah, you're right, I watched one season of Law and Order and thought "Great, I've seen 80% of all detective shows, no need to watch any more." /s

Re: Please Pay for a Year of Nothing

#48
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> kids love repeat content Then may I suggest a DVD player?

May I humbly suggest that VHS is superior to DVD for young children, because you can manually censor naughty bits out of “too adult” movies by scratching the magnetic coating off the tape

A magnet works as well and doesn't affect the lifespan of the tape as much.

Re: Please Pay for a Year of Nothing

#49
post #7

I don’t really care about “new” content. Similar to video games. I consume if it is new or old. If I can’t find content then I’m done with the service. Unfortunately on all these platforms discovery is horrible unless they want you to find it.

When reducing copyright terms or eliminating copyright comes up, there’s always someone posting about how horrible it’ll be if the rate of creation of new media plummets, and I just cannot relate. I’m not even going to get through every video game that’s probably worth playing, that already exists, before I die, and that’s a fairly new medium. Music? TV? Film? Books? LOL. LMFAO. If all publishing magically entirely s…

Everything published prior to 1928 is in the public domain. Reducing copyright terms or eliminating copyright would have no effect on those works. So, either your argument is self-defeating, or losing access to works published in 1928 and later would impact QOL. It seems there must be a cutoff point, sometime between 1928 and 2023, where the QOL impact of new works ceased. Why is that -- what changed?

And, once we find the cutoff point, can we make copyright terms for works published after that point infinite, since you don't need them for QOL anyway?

Re: Please Pay for a Year of Nothing

#50
post #7

I don’t really care about “new” content. Similar to video games. I consume if it is new or old. If I can’t find content then I’m done with the service. Unfortunately on all these platforms discovery is horrible unless they want you to find it.

I just want a complete list of what's available, alphabetically, and divided by broad genre. But apparently these services assume everyone is too dumb to scroll through a long list and find things on their own. So there's a landing page where the same titles appear in four different places on the same page, you have no idea what's available, items disappear without warning because of licensing issues, and the UI look…

https://www.justwatch.com/us?sort_by=title&sort_asc=true You can filter this list by streaming service(s) and genre.
Post reply on HN