Live data from Hacker News

Please Pay for a Year of Nothing

joe-steel.com

21–30 of 289 posts

Re: Please Pay for a Year of Nothing

#21
post #16
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

140 a year? You know you can pay for a good VPN for a lot less than that...

Can you though? NordVPN for instance comes to $67.5 for the first year and then $120 every year. I know there are cheaper options too, but not that much. Plus they still have to buy the subscription. And then dealing with the hassle of the VPN.

> Plus they still have to buy the subscription

Not necessarily...

Re: Please Pay for a Year of Nothing

#22
post #16
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

140 a year? You know you can pay for a good VPN for a lot less than that...

Can you though? NordVPN for instance comes to $67.5 for the first year and then $120 every year. I know there are cheaper options too, but not that much. Plus they still have to buy the subscription. And then dealing with the hassle of the VPN.

Yeah. Mullvad. Actually good too.

Something like $5.30/mo (forever). They take literal cash (as one of the options). WireGuard support. They actually do privacy, not just market it.

Edited to fix price estimate and clarify it isn’t just for the first year.

Re: Please Pay for a Year of Nothing

#23
post #7

I don’t really care about “new” content. Similar to video games. I consume if it is new or old. If I can’t find content then I’m done with the service. Unfortunately on all these platforms discovery is horrible unless they want you to find it.

Same here. Netflix is running out of old content. They were great with this for a while, but have incomplete sets of shows, which defeats the point of binging on them.

With Disney+, I can still watch Iron Man 2 if I wanted. HBO were the champions of original content and I can watch Silicon Valley the whole year if I wanted. I only watch TV to chill during lunch hour and don't need that much, but I need to be reassured that the content will still be there in 8 months.

Re: Please Pay for a Year of Nothing

#24
post #7

I don’t really care about “new” content. Similar to video games. I consume if it is new or old. If I can’t find content then I’m done with the service. Unfortunately on all these platforms discovery is horrible unless they want you to find it.

When reducing copyright terms or eliminating copyright comes up, there’s always someone posting about how horrible it’ll be if the rate of creation of new media plummets, and I just cannot relate. I’m not even going to get through every video game that’s probably worth playing, that already exists, before I die, and that’s a fairly new medium. Music? TV? Film? Books? LOL. LMFAO. If all publishing magically entirely s…

FTL already exists, so there's not really any point making new video games anyway.

Re: Please Pay for a Year of Nothing

#25

One counter point to why I personally pay for Disney+ is that I have kids, and kids love repeat content. I don't think new content particularly matters to them, at least not at their age. I wonder how much Disney+'s numbers will be helped by that tranche of subscribers.

  kids love repeat content
This is very true, to a certain age. My kids would watch some things over and over again, until they reached a certain age when there was an abrupt change. Once that change happens it's polar opposite, they could not fathom watching something a second time.

Re: Please Pay for a Year of Nothing

#26
post #7

I don’t really care about “new” content. Similar to video games. I consume if it is new or old. If I can’t find content then I’m done with the service. Unfortunately on all these platforms discovery is horrible unless they want you to find it.

When reducing copyright terms or eliminating copyright comes up, there’s always someone posting about how horrible it’ll be if the rate of creation of new media plummets, and I just cannot relate. I’m not even going to get through every video game that’s probably worth playing, that already exists, before I die, and that’s a fairly new medium. Music? TV? Film? Books? LOL. LMFAO. If all publishing magically entirely s…

I think this all the time too. My backlog of media, games, books, comics is huge. And thats what is in my possession. To say say nothing of what I'm gonna get. Add hobbies and I'm pretty much good till I expire

Re: Please Pay for a Year of Nothing

#27

One counter point to why I personally pay for Disney+ is that I have kids, and kids love repeat content. I don't think new content particularly matters to them, at least not at their age. I wonder how much Disney+'s numbers will be helped by that tranche of subscribers.

kids love repeat content This is very true, to a certain age. My kids would watch some things over and over again, until they reached a certain age when there was an abrupt change. Once that change happens it's polar opposite, they could not fathom watching something a second time.

What age was that in your case?

Re: Please Pay for a Year of Nothing

#28
post #16
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

140 a year? You know you can pay for a good VPN for a lot less than that...

Can you though? NordVPN for instance comes to $67.5 for the first year and then $120 every year. I know there are cheaper options too, but not that much. Plus they still have to buy the subscription. And then dealing with the hassle of the VPN.

Private Internet Access is $40/yr.

I interpreted the VPN option to imply violating copyright.

Re: Please Pay for a Year of Nothing

#29

> When Disney+ first premiered it was criticized for only having The Mandalorian and WandaVision which were both over in the blink of an eye. Marvel, for me, has had diminishing returns since then, and I would not subscribe to Disney+ to exclusively watch anything from Marvel at this point. > Star Wars, unfortunately, is also on the bubble with several disappointments, including the most recent Star Wars: Ashoka wher…

I agree with you that there are too many 1s on there. I think the problem is that passively consuming content is too easy, humans just aren't really wired for it. I am certainly not immune to it. In say 1900 if you wanted to entertain yourself you could talk to people, you could listen to someone play music (live), you could play music yourself, you could write, you could tinker, etc. The most passive consumption was basically reading, which is still a rather active thing compared to scroll tik tok or watch netflix (or both). So a lot of people instead of doing the difficult thing (creating) just consume.

Re: Please Pay for a Year of Nothing

#30
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

kids love repeat content This is very true, to a certain age. My kids would watch some things over and over again, until they reached a certain age when there was an abrupt change. Once that change happens it's polar opposite, they could not fathom watching something a second time.

What age was that in your case?

Not OP, but until I was about 10 or so, I wanted to watch Lion King 1 and a Half nearly every week.
Post reply on HN