Earlier quoted context omitted.
I love apache as much as anyone, cut my teeth with it and still work with it plenty. It doesn’t strike me as odd to question its fit for people who have more experience with containers. If there’s a reverse proxy in the front, one may just need business logic in the back.
>If there’s a reverse proxy in the front, one may just need business logic in the back. I'm trying to imagine what that haircut would look like
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.58 (CVE fixes)
31–40 of 47 posts
Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.4.58 (CVE fixes)
#32I'm surprised people still actively use it and it seems on par with nginx, at least according to https://www.netcraft.com/blog/january-2023-web-server-survey...
Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.4.58 (CVE fixes)
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why surprised? It's rock solid, stable, fast, and does pretty much everything you need, and nothing is hidden behind premium tiers, unlike nginx where they leave bugs and awful behaviour in the open source version that aren't in the premium ones (e.g. nginx used to only resolve hostname entries on start-up, https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,215830,215832#msg-215832 , so if you used a hostname in proxy_pass, and the…
I love apache as much as anyone, cut my teeth with it and still work with it plenty. It doesn’t strike me as odd to question its fit for people who have more experience with containers. If there’s a reverse proxy in the front, one may just need business logic in the back.
Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.4.58 (CVE fixes)
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
I love apache as much as anyone, cut my teeth with it and still work with it plenty. It doesn’t strike me as odd to question its fit for people who have more experience with containers. If there’s a reverse proxy in the front, one may just need business logic in the back.
>If there’s a reverse proxy in the front, one may just need business logic in the back. I'm trying to imagine what that haircut would look like
Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.4.58 (CVE fixes)
#35From the README of the apache_1.3.0 distribution (April 1998) https://archive.apache.org/dist/httpd/
Love this project. It changed the world and it still goes strong. The closest to "forever software"?
Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.4.58 (CVE fixes)
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
I love apache as much as anyone, cut my teeth with it and still work with it plenty. It doesn’t strike me as odd to question its fit for people who have more experience with containers. If there’s a reverse proxy in the front, one may just need business logic in the back.
I run all my microservices and web sites in containers behind Apache. It's not required to use any specific reverse proxy, nginx is Russian made, like Jetbrains' products so Google pushes them and that's why under-educated milenials assume nginx is the only reverse proxy on Earth.
Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.4.58 (CVE fixes)
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
I love apache as much as anyone, cut my teeth with it and still work with it plenty. It doesn’t strike me as odd to question its fit for people who have more experience with containers. If there’s a reverse proxy in the front, one may just need business logic in the back.
I run all my microservices and web sites in containers behind Apache. It's not required to use any specific reverse proxy, nginx is Russian made, like Jetbrains' products so Google pushes them and that's why under-educated milenials assume nginx is the only reverse proxy on Earth.
Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.4.58 (CVE fixes)
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm surprised you're surprised. It's a good web server.
I'm surprised HN hasn't added a feature where if you start a comment with "I'm surprised" it asks you to tick a box to confirm that you're really sure you're contributing to the discussion.
Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.4.58 (CVE fixes)
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
I love apache as much as anyone, cut my teeth with it and still work with it plenty. It doesn’t strike me as odd to question its fit for people who have more experience with containers. If there’s a reverse proxy in the front, one may just need business logic in the back.
I am actively trying to remove apache from a large chunk of projects mainly because at this point it is being used as a poor reverse proxy and not a web server which is its core competency.
Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.4.58 (CVE fixes)
#40I'm surprised people still actively use it and it seems on par with nginx, at least according to https://www.netcraft.com/blog/january-2023-web-server-survey...