gang behaviour
Police have formed gangs: * https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/la-is-investigating... * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynwood_Vikings
Small business owners say they're pressured to hire off-duty cops for security
121–130 of 606 posts
Re: Small business owners say they're pressured to hire off-duty cops for security
#122The DOJ has to start actually doing its job and completely dissolving these corrupt police departments and rebuilding them. Thats the only way we're going to get rid of corrupts cops like this.
> The DOJ has to start actually doing its job and completely dissolving these corrupt police departments Hoover's DOJ? I wish I could believe that your comment was ironic. If it is, then touche, you got me. It's really good.
Root Cause: Examining the way the world is, rather than how it should be, as per the parent comment's point.
Re: Small business owners say they're pressured to hire off-duty cops for security
#123Earlier quoted context omitted.
> It's about corrupt police shaking down small business owners I don't believe that there's ever been any other kind of cop. Certainly not outside of fiction. By prefixing the adjective "corrupt" though, you're certainly buying into it. Have you never read the headlines where the entire police union tries to extort the entire city? "If we don't get enough cops on the street, bad things will happen". Hell, even more e…
What kind of society are you envisioning that can address antisocial behavior without detaining or investigating anyone?
Re: Small business owners say they're pressured to hire off-duty cops for security
#124Earlier quoted context omitted.
What makes you think this would solve the corruption problem? Cops aren't corrupt because they're dumb , they're corrupt because the institutions they are part of allow and reward corruption. Without some mechanism to change that culture, simply adding more members to it will only bolster it. College degrees don't have anything to do with it. > I bet a lot of college graduates would kill for a pension right about now…
Do you know any cops? I know quite a few. Most of them are dumb as bricks and very easily succumb to their base instincts. They also have very over inflated egos. Thinking they know more than their citizens they're supposed to be protecting. Do you know who runs these departments? The ones with the most over inflated egos who literally think that they are in a war with their own citizens. They are also the ones that…
But I simply reject the premise that any of this is caused by lack of education and can be corrected by shifting the selection criteria. You need a certain amount of moral flexibility and malice to stay a cop for long, and that will be just as true of college graduates. Policing attracts all kinds of people as it is, but it only retains the ones it can mold into a particular nasty usefulness.
Re: Small business owners say they're pressured to hire off-duty cops for security
#125Earlier quoted context omitted.
What shortage of cops? Come to NYC, you'll see a seemingly infinite number of them parked on sidewalks/in bus lanes/bike lanes, hanging out in the subway on their phones, directing traffic where perfectly good traffic lights exist, harassing street vendors, etc. All while funding is being cut for actual public goods. There's no shortage of cops. There's a severe problem of misallocated resources. Their overtime budge…
New York is a very well paid police department as New York is a rich city. Other cities are not as wealthy and thus do not pay as well. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/us-experiencing-police-...
Re: Small business owners say they're pressured to hire off-duty cops for security
#126Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's still a crime if you're not prosecuted for it. That just means the DA's likely in on it and the criminality is systemic. Doesn't mean the activity becomes legal.
At that point, you need the feds to come in. And boy, aren't they the shining example to depend on
Systemic corruption is endemic in the US, but that’s very different from individual FBI agents taking bribes.
Re: Small business owners say they're pressured to hire off-duty cops for security
#127Vultures picking what away at parts of a corpse they can. You see so many examples of this, just straight parasitical behavior, in at least American society. I don’t think the U.S. is economically where the Soviet Union was when it fell, but it’s rapidly approaching the civic dysfunction and deep corruption. You have to wonder, is this the fall of an empire or something like the corruption of the late 1800s and early…
It's dangerous to extrapolate too much from the early 1900s because the US not being ground zero for two World Wars, therefore able to serve as an industrial core to help rebuild the destruction, created economic opportunity the likes of which one hopes we never see again. Lacking that destruction creating a huge market for American business, it's hard to predict what happens if America lets its domestic capitalism g…
What?
Re: Small business owners say they're pressured to hire off-duty cops for security
#128Already we've got two top-level comments who think this article is about crime. It isn't. It's about corrupt police shaking down small business owners under threat of losing their business license. ETA: Please give the pedantry a rest. Of course I know police corruption is criminal. That's not what the people talking about "crime" are talking about.
The new mafia game's shaping up nicely.
Re: Small business owners say they're pressured to hire off-duty cops for security
#129Vultures picking what away at parts of a corpse they can. You see so many examples of this, just straight parasitical behavior, in at least American society. I don’t think the U.S. is economically where the Soviet Union was when it fell, but it’s rapidly approaching the civic dysfunction and deep corruption. You have to wonder, is this the fall of an empire or something like the corruption of the late 1800s and early…
Re: Small business owners say they're pressured to hire off-duty cops for security
#130Earlier quoted context omitted.
You understand that any visible intoxication is overserving a customer right? You could give most people a beer an hour or so and forget about bottle service. Mixed drinks would have to contain less than a shots worth. I'm on board but the nightclubs won't be.
Is it your contention that every establishment serving customers more than a beer an hour should require security on premises?