Earlier quoted context omitted.
People are now posting about politics there. That's the death knell imo.
Tell me one area that has not gotten more political or partisan in recent years.
LinkedIn is laying off nearly 700 employees
111–120 of 336 posts
Re: LinkedIn is laying off nearly 700 employees
#112Re: LinkedIn is laying off nearly 700 employees
#113I just paid for a "Premium Career" account and it was $250 for one year or $39.99/month. I've gotten my $250 back from consulting leads through LinkedIn, but it stills seems high for the value to the average person.
Re: LinkedIn is laying off nearly 700 employees
#114I agree with all the takes about LinkedIn turning into a bad social network, but is that intrinsic to its design or is it something that happens no matter what? Is there a way to design a site--at the UI/policy level--to end up with a community that doesn't suck? For Hacker News, for example, is what we like about it just a consequence of the current set of members (in which, case, it might change eventually), or is…
I think it’s absolutely possible to have a community that doesn’t suck if sucky behavior is punished instead of rewarded.
Re: LinkedIn is laying off nearly 700 employees
#115I really admire the creative bullshit these execs come up with, AI can't compete: "This means adapting our organizational structures to improve agility and accountability, establishing unambiguous ownership and driving improved efficiency and transparency through reduced layering".
I'm all for criticizing empty corpo talk, but that quote is actually pretty reasonable and not empty. They are just saying that they are simplifying their organizational chart so that they don't have teams with overlapping responsabilities. It's just a polite way to say "we noticed that we had 2 teams doing the same thing so we merged them and dropped the resulting excess headcount".
It does have an actual discernible message, which puts it above a lot of other corporate gobbledygook. But it's still corporate gobbledygook that requires careful deciphering to understand what it says.
I don't consider it reasonable at all. It's slightly meaningful word vomit.
Re: LinkedIn is laying off nearly 700 employees
#116Has anyone else noticed that LinkedIn is turning into a shitty social media platform? Memes and videos are now being posted. I used to get decent use from it but stopped updating my profile because the site is cancer. Full of self patting on the back and people adding me to “grow their network”. Recruiters contacting me with “perfect fit” position in languages not on my profile. Can someone please develop hacker news…
Re: LinkedIn is laying off nearly 700 employees
#117Re: LinkedIn is laying off nearly 700 employees
#118What was the point of all this? There wasn't truth in any (or many of these) of these posts. Folks were sharing what they thought worth sharing, mostly to gain more attention.
That said, I think, we should see LinkedIn as a marketing platform targeting corporate employees.
Re: LinkedIn is laying off nearly 700 employees
#119Earlier quoted context omitted.
People are now posting about politics there. That's the death knell imo.
Tell me one area that has not gotten more political or partisan in recent years.
I host a weekly open-mic at a local bar (mostly music but some standup and poetry) and more and more often I’ve had to figure out how to gracefully handle a performer using some of their 6-10 minutes to share their not-as-popular-as-they-might think political takes or commentary.
And it should be handled gracefully, because I’m not in the business of banning political content from the contents of poetry or standup or lyrics or whatever. Both from all sides I wish there was a bit more of a shared cultural understanding or reservation towards divisive political topics.
Re: LinkedIn is laying off nearly 700 employees
#120I really admire the creative bullshit these execs come up with, AI can't compete: "This means adapting our organizational structures to improve agility and accountability, establishing unambiguous ownership and driving improved efficiency and transparency through reduced layering".
I'm all for criticizing empty corpo talk, but that quote is actually pretty reasonable and not empty. They are just saying that they are simplifying their organizational chart so that they don't have teams with overlapping responsabilities. It's just a polite way to say "we noticed that we had 2 teams doing the same thing so we merged them and dropped the resulting excess headcount".