Love it-- but since I'm not using systemd, it's a no-go. Would love to see it support more diverse systems, but last I checked it's pretty tightly coupled and I'm not sure who would have the bandwidth to adapt it.
Cockpit: Web-based graphical interface for servers
11–20 of 199 posts
Re: Cockpit: Web-based graphical interface for servers
#12I tried this some years ago. There was a hard limit on the number of computers you can connect to the community edition. I think it was 15.
where's the non community edition? I wonder if you're thinking about a different project altogether?
Re: Cockpit: Web-based graphical interface for servers
#13Anyone tried using cockpit with Raspberry Pi? Even though I mostly use the command line for all my server administrating, I could see myself using a graphical UI like this on some of my Raspberry Pi computers, when I quickly want to do something on them from my phone.
Re: Cockpit: Web-based graphical interface for servers
#14I tried this some years ago. There was a hard limit on the number of computers you can connect to the community edition. I think it was 15.
Re: Cockpit: Web-based graphical interface for servers
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
where's the non community edition? I wonder if you're thinking about a different project altogether?
Things might have changed, but there aren't that many vm/docker monitoring projects named cockpit that I can confuse this with.
Either way, the OP Cockpit has been unrestricted LGPL for years now so somehow you're mistaken.
Re: Cockpit: Web-based graphical interface for servers
#16Love it-- but since I'm not using systemd, it's a no-go. Would love to see it support more diverse systems, but last I checked it's pretty tightly coupled and I'm not sure who would have the bandwidth to adapt it.
Why beyond being different? Proudly announcing "but I don't use systemd" seems less like a humblebrag and more like an old man "get off my lawn"
Re: Cockpit: Web-based graphical interface for servers
#17Love it-- but since I'm not using systemd, it's a no-go. Would love to see it support more diverse systems, but last I checked it's pretty tightly coupled and I'm not sure who would have the bandwidth to adapt it.
Are we still fighting systemd? Why beyond being different? Proudly announcing "but I don't use systemd" seems less like a humblebrag and more like an old man "get off my lawn"
They may have more nuanced answers.
Re: Cockpit: Web-based graphical interface for servers
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are we still fighting systemd? Why beyond being different? Proudly announcing "but I don't use systemd" seems less like a humblebrag and more like an old man "get off my lawn"
I was curious because my gut says ideology about the vastness of systemd. Turns out, there's still a number of systems that don't make use of systemd: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Linux_distributions... They may have more nuanced answers.
"A number" being the operative word here. It's a small number, and for a pretty good reason.
I get there is an important reason to have choice, but bragging about how you don't use systemd is just meme-y and comes from a place of (misplaced) elitism usually.
Re: Cockpit: Web-based graphical interface for servers
#19Love it-- but since I'm not using systemd, it's a no-go. Would love to see it support more diverse systems, but last I checked it's pretty tightly coupled and I'm not sure who would have the bandwidth to adapt it.
sudo runuser -u cockpit-wsinstance -- /usr/libexec/cockpit-ws --port=9090 --for-tls-proxy
Re: Cockpit: Web-based graphical interface for servers
#20Love it-- but since I'm not using systemd, it's a no-go. Would love to see it support more diverse systems, but last I checked it's pretty tightly coupled and I'm not sure who would have the bandwidth to adapt it.